Argentina - AI-Generated Sexual Images Bill (7225-D-2024)

Bill 7225-D-2024 – Incorporation of Articles 128 bis and 131 bis into the Criminal Code on the Dissemination of AI-Generated Sexual Images

Expediente 7225-D-2024 – Incorporación de artículos 128 bis y 131 bis al Código Penal sobre difusión de imágenes sexuales generadas por IA

Argentina

RAI-AR-NA-E7IDAXX-2024
Under Review(Under Review)
BillFundamental RightsEnforcement and Penalties
Export PDF

Expediente 7225‑D‑2024 is a draft amendment to the Argentine Criminal Code that adds Articles 128 bis and 131 bis to criminalize production, distribution, possession and dissemination of AI‑manipulated sexual images (deepfakes). The bill raises penalties for offenses involving minors, introduces aggravating circumstances for mass dissemination or exploitation of trust, and creates a specific offense for digital harassment of minors via deepfakes.

Summary

Expediente 7225‑D‑2024 (presented 2 December 2024 by Deputy Eugenia Alianiello) proposes the insertion of two new articles — 128 bis and 131 bis — into the Argentine Criminal Code to address harms derived from the creation and dissemination of sexual content produced or manipulated using artificial intelligence and related technologies (commonly referred to as deepfakes). The bill responds to an observed gap in the criminal framework concerning sexual deepfakes: while existing Article 128 (as modified by Law 27.436) criminalizes production, distribution and possession of sexual representations of minors, the draft explicitly extends penal coverage to AI‑manipulated representations of adults without consent and creates special rules and aggravations for dissemination and harassment involving minors.

Key legal elements proposed: - Article 128 bis: establishes criminal penalties for three distinct sets of conduct. First, the bill retains and re‑affirms severe penalties for production/distribution/publishing of sexual representations of minors (three to eight years), including explicit references to representations whether 'real or simulated.' Second, it creates a new offense for producing, distributing, publishing or possessing audiovisual content manipulated through AI or other technologies that represents an adult in sexually intimate contexts without consent (one to six years). Third, it preserves and tightens penalties related to supplying sexual material to children under 14 (one month to three years). The article further sets aggravating circumstances — including dissemination via mass digital platforms or when committed by a person with a relationship of trust or authority — which increase penalties to six to twelve years, and provides enhanced ranges when the victim is under 13. - Article 131 bis: creates an offense (one to four years) for digital harassment, stalking or intimidation of minors using any digital or electronic means, explicitly including creation or dissemination of deepfake content intended to cause fear, distress or emotional harm. Penalties are increased for victims under 13.

The bill includes an entry‑into‑force clause stating that, if approved, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Boletín Oficial. The legislative file is assigned to criminal law, communications & informatics, and families/children commissions in the Chamber of Deputies. Primary policy objectives are to protect privacy, dignity and sexual integrity (especially of children and other vulnerable groups), close legal gaps caused by emerging AI technologies, and facilitate prosecution with specific legal definitions and aggravators. The proposal aligns with national obligations on child protection and with recent judicial decisions interpreting existing provisions to cover AI‑generated material. If enacted, the amendment would affect individuals who create or disseminate AI‑generated sexual content, online platforms that host such material, and enforcement authorities responsible for investigating and prosecuting digital sexual offenses.

Full article

Read full text ↗

Overview

Expediente 7225‑D‑2024 is a legislative proposal submitted to the Argentine Chamber of Deputies on 2 December 2024 (sponsored by Deputy Eugenia Alianiello). The project seeks to amend the Criminal Code by adding two articles — 128 bis and 131 bis — that criminalize the non‑consensual production, distribution, publication and possession of sexually explicit images or audiovisual material created or manipulated using artificial intelligence (AI) or comparable technologies. The draft reinforces existing prohibitions on sexual representations of minors and expressly extends penal protection to adults whose intimate images are created or altered without consent through AI. The document (project text available in the parliamentary file) includes graduated penalties, aggravating circumstances for mass dissemination or exploitation of trust, and a discrete offense addressing digital harassment of minors via deepfakes. For the legislative text, see the official project document: Exp. 7225‑D‑2024 (project PDF) and the Chamber of Deputies project page: Deputies project page (7225‑D‑2024).

Definitions

The bill uses and clarifies several operative terms: (1) "representations" — covers images or audiovisual depictions that may be real or simulated; (2) "intelligence artificial / manipulated via AI" — framed broadly to capture audiovisual content produced or altered by algorithmic or computational means (deepfakes); (3) "persons" — includes both minors (under 18) and adults; (4) "consent" — absence of consent is a central element for adult‑focused offenses; (5) "facilitate, publish, distribute" — verbs used to capture a range of acts from active creation to passive hosting or enabling access. The bill does not provide a narrow technical definition of 'AI' but instead uses functional language ('manipulated via intelligence artificial or any other technology') to ensure technological neutrality and future‑proof coverage.

Governance and Institutional Framework

Legislative stewardship and referral: the project is filed in the Chamber of Deputies and was referred to the "LEGISLACION PENAL" commission with complementary referrals to "COMUNICACIONES E INFORMATICA" and "FAMILIAS, NIÑEZ Y JUVENTUDES". The sponsor and committee structure indicate a cross‑sector legislative review combining criminal law expertise, digital communications policy and child protection. Operational enforcement remains with the criminal justice system: public prosecutors (Ministerio Público Fiscal) investigate and initiate prosecutions, courts adjudicate, and law enforcement agencies execute orders. Relevant executive and regulatory actors for policy coordination include the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights and agencies responsible for online harms and communications regulation. Official project text and docketing are accessible through the Chamber of Deputies pages: project page and the depositary PDF: project PDF.

Key Focus Areas

The bill targets three main problem sets. First, protection of minors: it preserves and elevates strict penalties for sexual representations of persons under 18, including explicit reference to 'real or simulated' depictions, and increases penalties for dissemination via mass digital platforms or when committed by trusted actors. Second, non‑consensual sexualized deepfakes involving adults: the bill creates a specific offense for producing or disseminating AI‑manipulated intimate audiovisual material of adults without consent (criminal range one to six years), addressing a gap in some prior interpretations of existing provisions. Third, digital harassment of minors: Article 131 bis criminalizes use of digital means (including deepfakes) to intimidate or cause emotional harm to persons under 18 (one to four years), recognizing non‑distribution harms such as stalking and targeted online intimidation. Across these areas, aggravating circumstances capture mass dissemination on digital platforms, exploitation of positions of trust or authority, and enhanced ranges when victims are under 13. The measure is explicitly framed as technology‑neutral: it covers content 'manipulated by artificial intelligence or any other technology', aiming to avoid obsolescence as methods evolve. It also contemplates different culpable acts (production, financing, offering, commerce, publication, facilitation, distribution, possession) to ensure both creators and intermediaries who knowingly participate may be prosecutable. The bill leaves enforcement mechanisms to the ordinary criminal procedure, while signaling the need for technical forensic capabilities to establish origin and manipulation of digital files.

Implementation Framework

If enacted, the law would enter into force the day after publication in the Boletín Oficial. Implementation depends largely on existing criminal justice capacities. Practical execution requires: training prosecutors, judges and police on digital forensics and metadata analysis; establishing procedures for preservation and cross‑border evidence cooperation given the online distribution of content; and clarifying platform responsibilities under ancillary communications or intermediary liability frameworks. The bill does not create a new regulatory authority or administrative notice‑and‑takedown mechanism; enforcement is criminal (investigation/prosecution). Legislative referral to the communications and informatics commission signals an expectation that follow‑up regulatory work — either by Congress or by the executive through sectoral agencies — may be necessary to address platform takedown, evidence preservation and cross‑border cooperation. The sponsor’s explanatory memorandum highlights the need to align criminal response with international commitments on child protection and digital rights.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring will principally rely on prosecutorial statistics and judicial outcomes: numbers of complaints, investigations opened, charges filed, convictions obtained, and sentences imposed under the new articles will indicate enforcement activity. Given digital distribution’s cross‑jurisdictional nature, evaluation should include metrics on platform removals, time‑to‑removal, cross‑border cooperation requests, forensic laboratory capacity and training initiatives for investigators. The bill itself does not establish monitoring reporting obligations; those functions would likely be assigned to the Ministry of Justice or to the Procuración General (MPF) under standard coordination practices. Policymakers may couple the criminal provisions with an annual review or reporting requirement through secondary measures to assess effectiveness and unintended impacts (for example, chilling effects on legitimate speech or privacy concerns for consensual adult content).

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

The proposed criminal sanctions are specified in the text. For sexual representations of minors (real or simulated) the bill prescribes imprisonment of three (3) to eight (8) years. For non‑consensual AI‑manipulated sexual content representing adults the range is one (1) to six (6) years. Facilitating access or supplying pornographic material to children under 14 carries a penalty of one (1) month to three (3) years. Article 131 bis (digital harassment of minors via deepfakes or other digital means) sets a penalty of one (1) to four (4) years. Aggravating circumstances (mass dissemination via digital platforms or abuse of trust/authority) increase the penalty ranges (six to twelve years in certain cases) and all ranges increase by one third when victims are under 13. Liability follows ordinary criminal procedure: individuals are subject to criminal prosecution; intermediaries who knowingly facilitate distribution may be implicated under the verbs used in the text. Remedies and appeals will proceed through the ordinary appellate judicial channels; nothing in the bill creates extraordinary administrative appeal processes.

Relationship to Other Instruments

The proposal modifies the Criminal Code and directly builds on existing Article 128 (as reformed by Law 27.436) which already criminalizes production and distribution of sexual representations of minors. It is consistent with Argentina’s obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and related instruments. Related domestic norms include Law 26.061 (comprehensive protection of children), Law 26.485 (prevention of gender‑based violence), and data privacy protections under national frameworks. Judicial developments (recent case law recognizing that AI‑generated sexual depictions of children can fall under existing Article 128) provide legal context and urgency for the statutory update. For the current Article 128 text see the official normative repository: Law 27.436 (Art.128 text) and the project PDF: Project PDF.

International Alignment

The draft aligns with global trends to criminalize sexual deepfakes and adapt sexual‑offense statutes to emerging technologies. Several jurisdictions have recently updated statutes or interpreted existing laws to cover AI‑generated sexual material; international instruments on child protection (e.g., the Optional Protocol to the CRC) and regional human‑rights obligations inform the bill’s framing. The explanatory text references Argentina’s international commitments to protect digital rights and combat violence against children. International cooperation will be essential for evidence collection, cross‑border takedown and mutual legal assistance, especially since hosting platforms and creators may be outside Argentina’s jurisdiction.

Implementation Timeline

PhaseTarget date / triggerNotes
Filing2024‑12‑02Project filed in Chamber of Deputies; docketed as Exp. 7225‑D‑2024.
Committee reviewUpon referral to commissionsReferral to Legis. Penal; Communications & Informatics; Families/Child commissions.
Plenary votesSubject to legislative scheduleRequires approval in both chambers to become law.
PromulgationDay of publication in Boletín OficialArticle 3 of the draft: law effective day after publication.
Operationalization0–12 months after enactmentTraining of prosecutors, law‑enforcement and forensic labs; possible secondary regulatory measures for platforms.

Sources and References

SourceType
Expediente 7225‑D‑2024 — Project PDF (Chamber of Deputies deposit)Primary Source
Deputies project page (Exp. 7225‑D‑2024)Primary Source
Law 27.436 (modification of Article 128) — Argentina.gob.arPrimary Source

Requirements for a company

What an organisation has to do under Argentina - AI-Generated Sexual Images Bill (7225-D-2024), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.

Not yet in force (Under Review). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.

Must do

9
  • Do not produce, distribute, publish, or possess AI-manipulated sexual images of minors.Individuals and entities involved in content creation or distribution.
  • Do not produce, distribute, publish, or possess AI-manipulated sexual images of adults without their consent.Individuals and entities involved in content creation or distribution.
  • Do not use AI-generated content or other digital means to harass or intimidate minors.Individuals using digital means.
  • Avoid facilitating access or supplying pornographic material to children under 14.Individuals and entities.
  • Establish rapid response procedures for content flagged as sexual deepfakes of minors or non-consensual adult intimate imagery.Online platforms and intermediaries.
  • Cooperate with law enforcement and preserve metadata upon lawful request.Online platforms and intermediaries.
  • +3 more in the table below

Must not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Who must do what

The obligations under Argentina - AI-Generated Sexual Images Bill (7225-D-2024), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

#WhoRequirementBy whenWhereSeverity
1Individuals and entities involved in content creation or distribution.Do not produce, distribute, publish, or possess AI-manipulated sexual images of minors.
criminalize the non‑consensual production, distribution, publication and possession of sexually explicit images or audiovisual material created or manipulated using artificial intelligence (AI)
Upon enactmentArticle 128 bisCritical
2Individuals and entities involved in content creation or distribution.Do not produce, distribute, publish, or possess AI-manipulated sexual images of adults without their consent.
creates a specific offense for producing or disseminating AI‑manipulated intimate audiovisual material of adults without consent
Upon enactmentArticle 128 bisCritical
3Individuals using digital means.Do not use AI-generated content or other digital means to harass or intimidate minors.
Article 131 bis criminalizes use of digital means (including deepfakes) to intimidate or cause emotional harm to persons under 18
Upon enactmentArticle 131 bisCritical
4Individuals and entities.Avoid facilitating access or supplying pornographic material to children under 14.
Facilitating access or supplying pornographic material to children under 14 carries a penalty of one (1) month to three (3) years.
Upon enactmentArticle 128 bisCritical
5Online platforms and intermediaries.Establish rapid response procedures for content flagged as sexual deepfakes of minors or non-consensual adult intimate imagery.
Establish rapid response for content flagged as sexual deepfakes of minors or non‑consensual adult intimate imagery
Upon enactmentImportant
6Online platforms and intermediaries.Cooperate with law enforcement and preserve metadata upon lawful request.
cooperate with law enforcement and preserve metadata upon lawful request.
OngoingImportant
7Law enforcement and prosecutors.Develop digital forensic procedures to establish the origin and manipulation of digital files.
training prosecutors, judges and police on digital forensics and metadata analysis
0–12 months after enactmentImportant
8Law enforcement and prosecutors.Document the chain of custody for AI artifacts and metadata in investigations.
document chain of custody for AI artifacts and metadata.
OngoingImportant
9Law enforcement and prosecutors.Request cross-border preservation orders for digital evidence when necessary.
request cross‑border preservation orders
OngoingImportant

© Regulations.AI · updated on 13-Jun-2026