South Korea - Intelligent Robot Promotion Act (2008)

Act on the Development and Supply (Distribution) of Intelligent Robots

지능형 로봇 개발 및 보급에 관한 법률

South Korea

RAI-KR-NA-DSDIRXX-2008
In Force (Amended)(In Force (Amended))
ActGovernance and OversightConformity Assessment and RegistrationSafety, Testing, and Evaluation
Export PDF

The Act on the Development and Supply (Distribution) of Intelligent Robots (original Korean title: 지능형 로봇 개발 및 보급 촉진법) establishes a statutory framework to promote the research, development, quality assurance, distribution and ethical use of intelligent robots in the Republic of Korea. Enacted in 2008 and subsequently amended, the law creates planning obligations for government, enables financial and institutional supports (including establishment of the Korea Robot Industry Advancement body), and sets out certification, market surveillance and safety-related measures for robot products and services.

Summary

Background and purpose: Enacted in 2008, the Act on the Development and Supply (Distribution) of Intelligent Robots (commonly referred to in South Korea as the "Intelligent Robot Promotion Act") was adopted to provide an institutional foundation to nurture intelligent robotics as a future strategic industry. The law aims to promote national economic development and improve quality of life by coordinating research and development (R&D), facilitating early market formation and public adoption, assuring product quality and safety, and addressing ethical concerns surrounding robot deployment. Core institutional architecture: The Act designates the central competent ministry (currently the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy) to prepare and publish a national basic plan for intelligent robot development and diffusion, coordinating sectoral plans from other ministries. It authorizes the government to provide financial support, establish or authorize public-interest organizations (for example, the South Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement - KIRIA), and create programmatic instruments such as investment companies or funds to mobilize private capital and mitigate early-stage market risk. Quality, safety and standards: The Act originally created a statutory basis for quality certification of intelligent robot products and established mechanisms to develop product standards and certification schemes. Over time the statutory framework has been updated to align certification with South Korea's industrial standardization regime and to enable specialized safety certification (including new provisions addressing outdoor mobile robot operation and operational safety testing), while delegating technical procedures to subordinate regulations, enforcement rules and designated conformity assessment bodies. Ethical and social safeguards: The Act requires the development and dissemination of a Robot Ethics Charter and requires implementers to consider ethical guidelines, user safety and social impacts in development and deployment. The statute also contemplates special measures for pilot projects and demonstration trials, including procedural accommodations (regulatory sandboxes, provisional permissions or testing exemptions) under controlled conditions to accelerate practical validation of new robot services. Market governance, surveillance and enforcement: The law empowers the competent ministry and designated agencies to oversee implementation, inspect facilities, withdraw or suspend certified status for non-conforming products, and recover public funds misused in support programs. Penalties include administrative measures, fines and other sanctioning powers found in the Act and implementing regulations. Relationship to other laws: The Act is implemented alongside South Korea's industrial standardization and product safety regimes and interacts with legislation on data protection, consumer protection, electrical and product safety, and transport laws when robots operate in public spaces. Amendments and modernisation: The Act has been amended multiple times since 2008 to reflect industry evolution, most recently with amendments adopted in 2020 and 2023 (affecting enforcement dates and adding provisions such as outdoor mobile robot safety and updated designation/authorization mechanisms). Practical significance: The statute provides the legal basis for national five-year basic plans for robotics, public investments, creation of KIRIA, and regulatory instruments that have enabled South Korea to pursue large-scale robotics adoption targets. For detailed authoritative text and revisions, the primary official source is the Korean Government's law portal. (Sources: Korean National Law Information Center and South Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement.)

Full article

Read full text ↗

Overview

The Act on the Development and Supply (Distribution) of Intelligent Robots (Korean: 지능형 로봇 개발 및 보급 촉진법) is a national enabling statute enacted in 2008 to establish a comprehensive policy, institutional and regulatory framework for the development, distribution and quality assurance of intelligent robot products and services in the Republic of South Korea. The law tasks the competent ministry with preparing multi-year basic plans, enables public support instruments (including funds and investment vehicles), mandates product quality and safety measures, and instructs the state to promulgate a Robot Ethics Charter to guide socially responsible design and use. The authoritative consolidated text and amendment history are published by the Korean National Law Information Center; see the official law entry for the consolidated text and revision history: Act entry on law.go.kr (amendments and side information). The Act established the legal base for creating and supporting the South Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement (KIRIA), which executes industry support and standardization tasks on behalf of the state. See the institute's institutional page: KIRIA (South Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement).

Definitions

The Act defines core concepts that determine regulatory scope and obligations, including "intelligent robots", "intelligent robot products", "developer/supplier/distributor", and specialized constructs such as "real-world demonstration (pilot) projects" and "robot industry promotion bodies." "Intelligent robots" are generally characterized as physical systems that integrate mechanical, electronic and software components that operate, wholly or partly, with embedded sensing, control and decision-making functions to perform tasks in the external environment. The statute distinguishes between product-focused obligations (manufacture, quality, certification) and operational considerations (deployment, public operation, safety during use), and delegates technical thresholds and specific test methods to subordinate regulations (decrees and enforcement rules) that implement the Act's objectives and allow technical updates without re-enacting the primary law.

Governance and Institutional Framework

The Act establishes a governance architecture that centers authority with the central competent ministry (currently the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy) which is responsible for formulating the national basic plan for intelligent robot development and diffusion. Ministries and municipal governments are required to prepare sectoral or local plans in line with the basic plan. The law authorizes the creation, designation or financial support of a public or quasi-public body to carry out industry promotion, research coordination, standardization and market support functions; this authority led to the establishment and funding of the South Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement (KIRIA). The Act also authorizes the ministry to designate conformity assessment and safety testing bodies, to set certification requirements, and to create enabling mechanisms for investment (e.g., regulated investment companies or public-private funds) to encourage commercialization. For official governance details, see the law portal and the implementing agencies' explanatory materials: law.go.kr - Act side information (2023 amendment) and KIRIA institutional page.

Key Focus Areas

The Act concentrates on several policy and regulatory domains: (1) Strategic planning and coordination – a statutory obligation to adopt a national multi-year basic plan (typically five-year cycles) that sets sectoral deployment targets and R&D priorities; (2) Market creation and public support – authorities may fund R&D, build demonstration infrastructure (for example, RobotLand projects), create investment facilitation measures, and provide grants/subsidies; (3) Product quality and conformity – establishing certification and standardization channels to ensure robot products meet defined safety and performance criteria (the law has been amended to harmonize product certification with South Korea’s broader industrial standardization regime); (4) Safety & operational regulation – requirements for safety testing, facility inspection and special operational approvals (recent revisions explicitly address outdoor mobile robot operation safety and operation-safety certification processes); (5) Ethical & social impacts – promotion of a Robot Ethics Charter and guidance to ensure development and deployment respect public safety and social values; (6) Market surveillance & enforcement – inspection, corrective actions, recovery of public funds, and penalty mechanisms where obligations are breached. The Act is therefore simultaneously promotional (industry support) and regulatory (safety, quality, ethics), a hybrid design intended to accelerate innovation while managing foreseeable harms.

Implementation Framework

Implementation is multi-layered: the primary Act sets high-level duties and powers, while detailed technical requirements, procedural rules and conformity assessment processes are set out in the implementing Presidential Decree (enforcement ordinance), Ministry-level enforcement regulations, and administrative guidelines. The implementing instruments identify designated certification bodies, test standards, reporting forms and sanctions. The Act authorizes pilot demonstration regimes and administrative accommodations (for example, provisional approvals for testing in limited public settings), enabling regulated experimentation under supervision. It also prescribes public financing modalities and accountability obligations for recipients; in cases where public funds are provided to a designated institute (e.g., KIRIA), the law and its enforcement rules set transparency and auditing expectations to ensure funds are used for stated promotion purposes.

Monitoring and Evaluation

The statute requires the competent ministry to monitor program performance and to publish consolidated basic plans and progress reports. Monitoring covers adoption metrics (units deployed, target sectors), R&D outputs (projects supported, standards produced), safety incidents, and the effectiveness of certification and market surveillance activities. The ministry may require periodic reporting from grant recipients, certification bodies and designated operators. These monitoring outputs feed into successive basic planning cycles and are used to justify legislative amendments, budget adjustments, and targeted regulatory responses such as new certification categories or operational safety rules for classes of robots (e.g., indoor service robots versus outdoor delivery robots).

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

The Act and its subordinate rules provide administrative sanctions (suspension or revocation of certification, withdrawal of public support, orders to recall non-conforming products) and financial penalties for statutory violations or misuse of public funds. The implementing regulations stipulate procedural avenues for administrative review and appeals. Liability in civil law (product liability, tort liability for harm caused by robots) is governed by general civil and product-safety laws; the Act complements these by setting compliance and conformity prerequisites that can affect evidentiary and remedial contexts in civil claims. The law also contains provisions enabling recovery of misapplied subsidies and administrative penalties for breaches of certification or reporting duties.

Relationship to Other Instruments

The Act is designed to operate together with South Korea's broader regulatory and standardization framework. It references and coordinates with the Industrial Standardization Act (for product standards and certification), consumer protection and product safety legislation, transport and road-use laws (relevant when robots operate in public spaces), and privacy/data-protection frameworks where robot operation involves personal data. Implementing decrees align certification procedures with national accreditation systems, and the Act delegates many technical matters to subordinate regulations to ensure coherence with sectoral safety and telecom rules when robots incorporate communications or autonomous navigation functions.

International Alignment

The statute and implementing agencies actively pursue international standardization and cooperative engagement to ensure Korean robotics products and certification mechanisms are interoperable with global markets. South Korea's standards bodies and KIRIA participate in international fora to harmonize safety test methods, ethics guidance and conformity assessment approaches, enabling exporters to meet foreign market expectations while facilitating imports of compliant components. The Act’s flexible delegation model supports alignment with evolving international standards without frequent primary-law changes.

Implementation Timeline

EventDateNotes
Original enactment (promulgation)2008-03-28Law No. 9014 promulgated (original text establishing the Act).
Original entry into force2008-09-29Initial enforcement date for the Act and its implementing rules.
Establishment of KIRIA (statutory basis)2010-06-24KIRIA founded under the Act’s Article authorizing establishment of an industry promotion body; statute provides government support authority.
Major amendment (codifications & updates)2016-01-06Amendments including alignment to Industrial Standardization Act and funding rules.
Significant revision2020-12-29 (effective 2021-12-30)Legislative updates (Law No.17799) with implementation effects from late 2021.
Recent amendment (including outdoor mobile robot provisions)2023-05-16 (effective 2023-11-17)Partial amendment (Law No.19412) introducing updated enforcement, certification and operational provisions (see official law portal).
Enforcement ordinance revision2025-03-12Most recent known enforcement ordinance amendment to align technical and administrative measures (see law portal enforcement ordinance entry).

Sources and References

SourceType
Act on the Development and Supply (Distribution) of Intelligent Robots - law.go.kr (official consolidated text and amendment history)Primary Source
South Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement (KIRIA) - institutional pagePrimary Source (implementing agency)

Requirements for a company

What an organisation has to do under South Korea - Intelligent Robot Promotion Act (2008), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.

Must do

7
  • Obtain required conformity assessment or safety certification before placing products on market.Developers and suppliers of intelligent robot products.
  • Comply with grant agreements and financial accountability rules for public funds.Recipients of public funds for robot development.
  • Secure special operational approvals for outdoor mobile robot operations.Operators of outdoor mobile robots.
  • Ensure robot operations comply with South Korea’s personal data protection laws.Entities operating intelligent robots processing personal data.
  • Implement Robot Ethics Charter principles and user-safety design measures.Developers and operators of intelligent robots.
  • Provide timely reports to competent agencies for supported projects and respond to audits.Grant recipients and designated operators.
  • +1 more in the table below

Must not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should do

1
  • Align corporate or project plans with the government’s current intelligent robot basic plan.Developers and suppliers of intelligent robots.

Should not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Who must do what

The obligations under South Korea - Intelligent Robot Promotion Act (2008), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

#WhoRequirementBy whenWhereSeverity
1Developers and suppliers of intelligent robot products.Obtain required conformity assessment or safety certification before placing products on market.
Product quality and conformity – establishing certification and standardization channels to ensure robot products meet defined safety and performance criteria.
Before placing on marketCritical
2Recipients of public funds for robot development.Comply with grant agreements and financial accountability rules for public funds.
The law also contains provisions enabling recovery of misapplied subsidies and administrative penalties for breaches of certification or reporting duties.
Throughout project durationCritical
3Operators of outdoor mobile robots.Secure special operational approvals for outdoor mobile robot operations.
recent revisions explicitly address outdoor mobile robot operation safety and operation-safety certification processes.
Before public operationCritical
4Entities operating intelligent robots processing personal data.Ensure robot operations comply with South Korea’s personal data protection laws.
It references and coordinates with... privacy/data-protection frameworks where robot operation involves personal data.
ContinuouslyImportant
5Developers and operators of intelligent robots.Implement Robot Ethics Charter principles and user-safety design measures.
promotion of a Robot Ethics Charter and guidance to ensure development and deployment respect public safety and social values.
During design and deploymentImportant
6Grant recipients and designated operators.Provide timely reports to competent agencies for supported projects and respond to audits.
The ministry may require periodic reporting from grant recipients, certification bodies and designated operators.
As required by agenciesImportant
7Entities conducting robot pilot demonstrations.Secure provisional approvals for demonstrations when operating outside standard regulatory envelopes.
The Act authorizes pilot demonstration regimes and administrative accommodations (for example, provisional approvals for testing in limited public settings).
Before conducting demonstrationsImportant
8Developers and suppliers of intelligent robots.Align corporate or project plans with the government’s current intelligent robot basic plan.
Strategic planning and coordination – a statutory obligation to adopt a national multi-year basic plan.
ContinuouslyRecommended

© Regulations.AI · updated on 13-Jun-2026