Lithuania - AI Act Implementation Amendments (XV-105, XV-106)

Amendments implementing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Amendments to the Law on Technology and Innovation (XV-105) and the Law on Information Society Services (XV-106) to implement Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Lithuanian AI Act implementation amendments)

Pakeitimai, įgyvendinant ES dirbtinio intelekto aktą: Pakeitimai Technologijų ir inovacijų įstatyme (XV-105) ir Informacinės visuomenės paslaugų įstatyme (XV-106), siekiant įgyvendinti Reglamentą (ES) 2024/1689 (Lietuvos dirbtinio intelekto įstatymo įgyvendinimo pakeitimai)

Lithuania

RAI-LT-NA-AIEAIXX-2025
Effective: April 1, 2025
In Force(In Force)
ActGovernance and OversightConformity Assessment and RegistrationMarket Surveillance
Export PDF

2025 Lithuanian amendments designate national AI authorities, set up an AI sandbox and align national law to the EU AI Act.

Overview

In January 2025 the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania adopted a linked package of amendments to two national laws — the Law on Technology and Innovation (amendment adopted as Act No. XV-105) and the Law on Information Society Services (amendment adopted as Act No. XV-106) — to implement key domestic obligations arising from the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). The amendments were published in the official register (TAR) on 22 January 2025 and most of the new provisions became effective on 1 April 2025, with several provisions staged to enter into force on other specified dates. Full text of the principal amendment is available in the official register: https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/it/legalAct/9c30a402d88811efa5ddd96c482819f5.

Definitions

This package uses the following key terms (as applied in the national amendments and for implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689): Innovation Agency (Inovacijų agentūra) — the national notifying authority responsible for assessing and helping to notify conformity assessment bodies; Communications Regulatory Authority (Ryšių reguliavimo tarnyba, RRT) — the national market surveillance authority and single point of contact; notified/conformity assessment bodies — independent entities (companies, research institutions, certification bodies, etc.) that may be notified to perform conformity assessment for high‑risk AI systems; AI regulatory sandbox (DI smėliadėžė) — a controlled pilot environment for testing AI systems with regulatory supervision; providers and deployers — actors placing AI systems on the market or using them (including high‑risk systems listed in Annex III of the EU AI Act); market surveillance — inspections, investigations and enforcement activities undertaken by the designated national authority. If additional formal legal definitions are required, readers should consult the official Acts in the State Gazette (TAR) listed in Sources.

Governance and Institutional Framework

The amendments allocate national roles and responsibilities to implement the EU AI Act. Principal national actors and their primary functions under the amendments are:

  • Innovation Agency (Inovacijų agentūra): designated as the national notifying authority; tasked with assessing competence of domestic conformity assessment bodies, supporting notification procedures, and establishing/operating an AI regulatory sandbox.
  • Communications Regulatory Authority (Ryšių reguliavimo tarnyba, RRT): designated as the national market surveillance authority and the single point of contact to liaise with the European AI Office and other Member State authorities; responsible for market surveillance, inspections and cross‑border cooperation.
  • Other oversight bodies: the State Data Protection Inspectorate, the Consumer Rights Protection Service and other sectoral authorities retain or have specified roles for data protection, consumer protection and sectoral oversight where relevant.

The national arrangements are intended to provide the institutional infrastructure required by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and to enable cooperation with EU bodies and other Member State authorities.

Key Focus Areas

  • Designation of national competent authorities: the amendments explicitly designate the Innovation Agency as the notifying authority (for assessing and assisting the notification of conformity assessment bodies) and RRT as the market surveillance authority and single contact point. e-tar.lt
  • Notified/conformity assessment bodies: procedures and administrative responsibilities are created for the Innovation Agency to assess the competence of potential conformity assessment bodies that may be notified under the EU AI Act. eimin.lrv.lt
  • AI regulatory sandbox (DI smėliadėžė): the package mandates the creation and operation of a controlled AI regulatory pilot environment within the Innovation Agency to support testing, compliance support and capacity‑building for businesses (with statutory timetables targeting sandbox establishment and operational tasks by early 2026). eimin.lrv.lt
  • Information Society Services alignment: amendments to the Information Society Services Act update definitions and the functions of RRT, the State Data Protection Inspectorate and consumer protection services to ensure they can perform DSA/AI Act duties, explicitly referencing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (DSA) in the amended text. e-tar.lt
  • Startup support & institutional consolidation: the Technology & Innovation Act amendments create a legal basis for the consolidated Innovation Agency to assess start‑ups’ innovation potential (refining the definition of 'start‑up') and to prioritise support for AI‑relevant ventures as part of economic competitiveness measures. e-seimasx.lrs.lt

Implementation Framework

The national amendments function primarily as implementing measures for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689: they do not create a separate, standalone domestic AI Act but assign national authorities, procedural roles and infrastructure required under the EU Act. Core elements of the implementation framework include:

  • Assessment and notification procedures: administrative procedures for the Innovation Agency to assess and assist domestic conformity assessment bodies so those bodies can be notified to perform conformity assessment for high‑risk AI systems under the EU AI Act.
  • Sandbox operations: statutory requirements and timelines for establishing an AI regulatory sandbox within the Innovation Agency to offer testing, technical and compliance advisory services to participants (with EU and national funding allocated for pilot phases).
  • Market surveillance and single contact point: RRT is given responsibilities and procedural tools to conduct market surveillance, inspections, incident handling and cross‑border cooperation in line with EU requirements.
  • Coordination among oversight bodies: clarifications in the Information Society Services Act to enable cooperation between RRT, the State Data Protection Inspectorate, consumer protection services and other authorities for digital services and AI‑related oversight.

Operationalisation steps are underway, including procurement, calls for sandbox participants and allocations of funding for pilot activities.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation are to be conducted through the national authorities with coordination mechanisms to support EU‑level oversight and cross‑border cooperation. Recent implementation developments include government allocations (approximately €3 million earmarked for sandbox activities across selected regions) and the Innovation Agency publishing calls and informational material for sandbox participants. RRT has signalled the need for budgeted resources to undertake its new market surveillance tasks. These implementation steps — staffing, funding, published procedures and sandbox pilot outcomes — will form the basis for evaluating readiness to support full application of the EU AI Act.

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

Enforcement, penalties and administrative fines for substantive breaches of the AI Act (for example banned practices, high‑risk system requirements, conformity assessment, transparency and incident reporting) are primarily established at EU level in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. The Lithuanian amendments generally do not recreate parallel penalty regimes; instead they provide the national institutional structure (market surveillance authority, notifying authority, single contact point) and procedural tools through which the EU enforcement architecture and national market surveillance may be exercised. The amendments also require national budgeting and resourcing to enable RRT and other oversight bodies to exercise enforcement powers entrusted by the EU framework. Specific domestic procedural enforcement measures and appeal routes will operate within the broader EU enforcement architecture and relevant national administrative law procedures.

Relationship to Other Instruments

The national amendments explicitly implement obligations arising from Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act) and align the Information Society Services Act with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (Digital Services Act) where duties intersect. The amendments therefore function as national implementing measures to enable conformity assessment, notification and market surveillance consistent with EU law. Authorities are required to coordinate with the European AI Office and follow cross‑sectoral rules where DSA/AI provisions interact.

International Alignment

These amendments are oriented to full compliance and cooperation with EU‑level AI governance instruments. Designations such as the single contact point and the market surveillance authority are intended to facilitate cross‑border cooperation with other Member States and with the European AI Office, enabling participation in the EU network for conformity assessment, market surveillance and information exchange as required under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.

Implementation Timeline

DateEvent
2024-07-12Publication of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act) in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ L 2024/1689). eur-lex.europa.eu
2024-08-01AI Act entered into force at EU level (publication + entry into force; staged applicability follows). eur-lex.europa.eu
2025-01-14Seimas adopted amendments to the Law on Technology and Innovation (Act No. XV-105) and to the Law on Information Society Services (Act No. XV-106). e-tar.lt
2025-01-22Amendments published in the State Gazette (TAR). e-tar.lt
2025-04-01Majority of the national amendments entered into force (with specific provisions phased in on other dates). e-tar.lt
2025-08-02Certain procedural provisions in the Technology & Innovation Act amendments scheduled to come into force. e-tar.lt
2026-01-01Target date for the Innovation Agency to have the AI regulatory sandbox established and operational under the statutory timetable. eimin.lrv.lt
2026-08-02Broad applicability date for many provisions of the EU AI Act across the EU (staged timetable under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). eur-lex.europa.eu

Compliance Checklist

RequirementDescription
Designation and RegistrationConfirm whether your organisation must engage with national notifying authority (Innovation Agency) and whether any conformity assessment bodies to be used are or will be notified; prepare documentation for conformity assessment interactions.
Conformity Assessment PreparationPlan for conformity assessment procedures for high‑risk AI systems (technical documentation, risk management, quality management) and identify potential notified bodies assessed by the Innovation Agency.
Market Surveillance ReadinessPrepare for possible market surveillance inspections and incident reporting related to high‑risk systems; ensure recordkeeping and incident response procedures align with national and EU requirements under RRT oversight.
Sandbox EngagementIf seeking to use the AI regulatory sandbox, monitor Innovation Agency calls and application processes (sandbox is targeted to be operational by 2026‑01‑01) and gather materials for pilot testing and compliance support.
Data Protection and Consumer‑Rights CoordinationEnsure coordination with data protection and consumer protection obligations (State Data Protection Inspectorate and Consumer Rights Protection Service may be involved in oversight); update privacy impact assessments and consumer information as required.
Resourcing and FundingPlan internal resourcing to meet compliance (technical, legal, recordkeeping) and consider applying for available national/EU support for sandbox participation or capacity building.

Sources and References

SourceURL
Lietuvos Respublikos technologijų ir inovacijų įstatymo Nr. XIII-1414 — pakeitimo įstatymas (Act No. XV-105) — e‑TAR (official register)https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/it/legalAct/9c30a402d88811efa5ddd96c482819f5
Lietuvos Respublikos informacinės visuomenės paslaugų įstatymo — pakeitimo įstatymas (Act No. XV-106) — e‑TAR (official register)https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/tt/legalAct/e351b770d88811efa5ddd96c482819f5
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act) — EUR‑Lex (Official Journal text)https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=OJ%3AL_202401689
Ministry of the Economy and Innovation (EIMIN) — Seimas approves amendments to accelerate the development of artificial intelligence in Lithuania (official announcement)https://eimin.lrv.lt/en/structure-and-contacts/news-1/seimas-approves-amendments-to-accelerate-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-in-lithuania/
Ministry of the Economy and Innovation — AI regulatory sandbox (DI smėliadėžė) program pagehttps://eimin.lrv.lt/lt/veiklos-sritys/skaitmenine-politika/dirbtinis-intelektas/di-akto-igyvendinimas/di-smeliadeze/
Seimas (parliament) — legislative act and explanatory material regarding Innovation Agency provisions (official parliamentary register)https://e-seimasx.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/51938be0d27711efbd239e318cbd5b26
Innovation Agency (Inovacijų agentūra) — official site and implementation newshttps://inovacijuagentura.lt/site/news/2025
Seimas / Parliamentary portal — Communications Regulatory Authority (RRT) commentary and official submissions (official parliamentary materials)https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/rs/legalact/TAK/809734b0a1cf11ef9db2c9aaf9c67042/
Plain English

Lithuania has updated its national laws to establish the institutional framework and support mechanisms needed to implement the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, primarily affecting companies that develop or use AI systems.

This legislation primarily impacts "providers" and "deployers" of AI systems operating in Lithuania, particularly those dealing with "high-risk" AI systems as defined by the EU AI Act. This includes businesses, research institutions, and certification bodies involved in placing AI systems on the market or using them.

The amendments designate two key national authorities: - The Innovation Agency (Inovacijų agentūra) will act as the national notifying authority, assessing and supporting domestic bodies that perform conformity assessments for high-risk AI systems. - The Communications Regulatory Authority (Ryšių reguliavimo tarnyba, RRT) is the national market surveillance authority and single point of contact, responsible for inspections and enforcement. Companies must therefore prepare for conformity assessment procedures for high-risk AI systems, engaging with bodies potentially assessed by the Innovation Agency, and for market surveillance inspections and incident reporting under RRT's oversight. The law also mandates the creation of an AI regulatory sandbox by the Innovation Agency, targeted to be operational by early 2026, offering a controlled environment for businesses to test AI systems and receive compliance support.

Most of these national amendments came into force on April 1, 2025, with some procedural provisions following on August 2, 2025. The broader EU AI Act provisions will apply in stages, with many becoming applicable across the EU by August 2, 2026.

The Lithuanian amendments do not introduce new domestic penalties. Instead, they establish the national bodies and procedures through which the substantial penalties and enforcement mechanisms of the EU AI Act will be applied. This means the Communications Regulatory Authority (RRT) will enforce EU-level fines for breaches, such as non-compliance with high-risk system requirements or banned AI practices. A practical pitfall for businesses is that while the national framework is now in place, the effectiveness of market surveillance and enforcement will heavily depend on adequate resourcing. The Communications Regulatory Authority (RRT) has already highlighted the need for sufficient budget to undertake its new market surveillance responsibilities, suggesting potential initial inconsistencies in enforcement if resources are stretched.

Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.

What you must do — compliance checklist

0 / 7 marked complete

Plain-English obligations under Lithuania - AI Act Implementation Amendments (XV-105, XV-106). Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

  1. #1CriticalBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Providers of high-risk AI systems.

    Plan for conformity assessment procedures for high‑risk AI systems... and identify potential notified bodies assessed by the Innovation Agency.
  2. #2CriticalAug 2, 2026

    Applies to: Providers and deployers of AI systems.

    RRT is given responsibilities and procedural tools to conduct market surveillance, inspections, incident handling and cross‑border cooperation.
  3. #3CriticalOngoing

    Applies to: Providers and deployers of AI systems.

    State Data Protection Inspectorate, the Consumer Rights Protection Service and other sectoral authorities retain or have specified roles.
  4. #4CriticalBefore performing assessment

    Applies to: Conformity assessment bodies for AI systems.

    Innovation Agency... tasked with assessing competence of domestic conformity assessment bodies, supporting notification procedures.
  5. #5ImportantAug 2, 2026

    Applies to: Providers and deployers of AI systems.

  6. #6ImportantAug 2, 2026

    Applies to: Providers of Information Society Services.

    amendments to the Information Society Services Act update definitions and the functions of RRT, the State Data Protection Inspectorate and consumer protection services to ensure they can perform DSA/AI Act duties.
  7. #7RecommendedJan 1, 2026

    Applies to: Businesses developing AI systems.

    mandates the creation and operation of a controlled AI regulatory pilot environment within the Innovation Agency.

© Regulations.AI — created on 13-Jun-2026