Norway - AI Plan for Health Services
Joint AI plan for the safe and effective use of AI in the Norwegian health and care services 2024–2025
Felles AI-plan for trygg og effektiv bruk av AI i helse- og omsorgstjenestene 2024–2025
Norway
RAI-NO-NA-JAPSEXX-2025A joint plan published by the Norwegian Directorate of Health in cooperation with national agencies for 2024–2025 to facilitate safe, ethical and effective deployment of AI in health and care services. The plan establishes cross-agency coordination, guidance on validation and regulatory navigation, competence-building, and a series of sectoral measures (including work on large language models) to accelerate beneficial, trustworthy AI use.
Summary
Read full text ↗Plain English
Overview
The Joint AI Plan for the health and care services was published by the Norwegian Directorate of Health (Helsedirektoratet) with a public release date of 18 February 2025. The plan is a coordinated, time‑bound sector framework covering measures for 2024–2025. It implements a mandate from the Ministry of Health and Care Services to facilitate the safe introduction and broader, appropriate use of artificial intelligence across primary and specialist health services in Norway. The Directorate led the work in collaboration with the Norwegian Medicines Agency (Medical Products Agency), the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, the regional health authorities and KS (the Association of Local and Regional Authorities). The plan aims to enable benefits from AI while safeguarding patient safety, privacy and rights, and to provide practical support for national, regional and municipal actors involved in procurement, deployment and oversight of AI systems.
Definitions
The plan provides and uses sectoral definitions for AI and related concepts (see the chapter on definitions in the full report). It distinguishes types of applications, including clinical decision support, administrative automation, large language models and other machine learning systems, and clarifies how these categories overlap with regulated categories such as medical devices. Definitions are aligned with common EU and Nordic terminology and with sectoral definitions used by contributing national agencies. Where necessary, the plan refers stakeholders to the detailed definitions section of the full publication for precise wording and sectoral context.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The Directorate of Health is identified as the lead coordinating body for the joint plan, with specified collaboration partners across regional authorities, inspectorates and sector organisations. Governance measures established by the plan include the formation of an AI Advisory Board for the health and care sector (expected to meet four to six times annually), structured cross‑agency collaboration among named agencies, use of a prioritisation committee to sequence activities, and establishment of user panels to incorporate provider and patient perspectives. The plan describes roles and responsibilities for national agencies, regional health authorities and municipal providers, and asks that agencies clarify responsibilities that rest with vendors, national bodies and local providers. The governance model is intended to support a shared approach to quality assurance, validation, guidance production and competence building, while ensuring accountability through existing supervisory authorities.
Key Focus Areas
- Sector coordination and cross‑agency collaboration: establishing mechanisms (AI Advisory Board, prioritisation committee, user panels) to coordinate activity across national agencies, regional authorities and municipal providers.
- Quality assurance and validation: developing a framework for quality assurance and producing a report on validation of AI solutions to support safe deployment.
- Regulatory guidance and navigation: producing cross‑agency regulatory guidance and public information pages to help services navigate existing legal frameworks (medical device rules, health legislation and data protection).
- Competence building and training: emphasis on building competence among health personnel and managers, including seminars and knowledge resources to elevate sector capability to assess, implement and monitor AI.
- Large language models and specialised resources: creating knowledge resources on large language models (LLMs) and preparing risk assessments specific to LLMs.
- Information sharing and lessons learned: running a series of seminars and building a knowledge base to share experience, use cases and sector needs.
- Benefit realisation and ethical use: promoting medically appropriate, ethically sound use that secures patient safety, transparency and respect for rights.
- European and Nordic cooperation: aligning with European and Nordic standardisation efforts, and preparing providers for EU regulatory developments such as the EU AI Act.
Implementation Framework
The plan sets out concrete measures and a programme for 2024–2025. Implementation responsibilities are split between the Directorate of Health as the lead coordinator and partner agencies that will produce guidance, validation tools and public information. Key implementation activities include establishing the AI Advisory Board, convening seminars and user panels to collect and disseminate experience, producing cross‑agency regulatory guidance and public information pages, developing a sector framework for quality assurance, publishing a report on validation of AI solutions, creating knowledge resources on large language models, and preparing targeted risk assessments and reports for the Ministry of Health and Care Services. The plan indicates that measures are intended to support local and regional implementation while clarifying national responsibilities for guidance and shared activities. It positions sectoral actors — national agencies, regional health authorities, municipal health and care providers, suppliers, and R&D environments — as primary implementers, with the Directorate facilitating coordination and consolidation of resources.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation within the plan rely on a mix of cross‑agency reporting, milestone deliverables and existing supervisory channels. The plan documents specific milestone deliverables (for example, a knowledge base on large language models, a report on quality assurance and assessments to the Ministry) and asks agencies to report progress to the Directorate and to the Ministry where appropriate. User panels and the prioritisation committee are intended to provide ongoing feedback and to inform prioritisation of activities. The plan also links expected implementation and validation practices to the supervisory roles of existing agencies so that monitoring of compliance and safety is exercised through existing enforcement mechanisms. Regular seminars and knowledge‑sharing events are included as practical evaluation forums to share experience and surface implementation challenges.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
The Joint AI Plan is a coordinating policy and guidance document rather than primary legislation; it does not itself create new statutory penalties. Enforcement and penalties remain grounded in existing sector laws and the mandates of supervisory agencies. The plan explicitly links expected implementation and validation practices to the enforcement and supervisory roles of agencies such as the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision and the Norwegian Medicines Agency. Where AI applications fall within regulated categories (for example certain medical devices), existing rules, conformity assessment procedures and enforcement pathways apply. The plan seeks to reduce uncertainty by clarifying which agency’s rules are likely to apply and by providing guidance to help providers meet existing statutory obligations (patient safety, duties of health personnel, data protection and medical device requirements). Appeals and liability therefore follow the ordinary legal channels associated with the underlying statutory frameworks and regulatory bodies; the plan does not establish separate appeal mechanisms.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The plan positions itself as sectoral implementation support that complements national laws and EU developments. It explicitly seeks alignment with the EU AI Act and wider digital policies, and coordinates with national digitalisation strategies and existing health regulations (medical device rules, patient and data protection laws). The plan sets out how sectoral guidance and quality assurance work will interface with statutory obligations and with the responsibilities of agencies such as DigDir (the Norwegian Digitalisation Agency) and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority where relevant. The plan is intended to prepare providers for future regulatory developments by clarifying expectations, producing guidance for navigation of current rules and by aligning terminology and approaches with European and Nordic standardisation work.
International Alignment
The plan refers to and aligns with common EU and Nordic terminology and with international standardisation work relevant to AI in health. It seeks cooperation with European initiatives, aligns its definitions and guidance with commonly accepted EU/Nordic terms, and explicitly aims to prepare the sector for the EU AI Act and related European policy and standardisation processes. The plan also positions Norway’s sector activity within Nordic collaboration avenues and European standardisation work to ensure interoperability of approaches and to leverage shared knowledge on risk assessment, validation and governance of AI in health.
Implementation Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Sector consultation meeting (input session) |
| 2024-08-13 | Norwegian-language plan published (Felles KI-plan) |
| 2025-02-19 | English joint plan published (Helsedirektoratet) |
| 2025-11-16 | Plan retrieval (this entry) |
Compliance Checklist
| Requirement | Description |
|---|---|
| Validation and Quality Assurance | Providers are expected to use the plan’s proposed quality assurance framework and validation guidance to assess AI systems before deployment. The plan includes a report on validation of AI solutions and tools to help demonstrate safe, validated use in line with statutory duties. |
| Regulatory Navigation | Follow cross‑agency regulatory guidance to determine applicability of medical device rules, health legislation and data protection requirements. The plan commissions cross‑agency guidance to reduce uncertainty on which rules apply. |
| Documentation and Vendor Responsibilities | Vendors are expected to provide validation documentation and interoperability information. The plan asks agencies to clarify responsibilities that rest with vendors, national bodies and local providers. |
| Competence and Training | Health services must ensure competence building for staff involved in selecting, using and monitoring AI, utilising the plan’s seminars, knowledge base and other training resources. |
| Transparency and Patient Rights | Providers must ensure patient safety, privacy and ethically appropriate use; the plan emphasises transparency and support to meet statutory obligations (patient safety, health personnel duties, data protection). |
Sources and References
| Source | URL |
|---|---|
| Joint AI plan for the safe and effective use of AI in the Norwegian health and care services 2024–2025 (Helsedirektoratet) | https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/joint-ai-plan-for-the-safe-and-effective-use-of-ai-in-the-norwegian-health-and-care-services-2024-2025 |
The Norwegian Directorate of Health has published a joint plan to guide the safe, ethical, and effective use of artificial intelligence in Norway's health and care services for 2024-2025. This framework applies to all national, regional, and municipal actors involved in procuring, deploying, and overseeing AI systems within primary and specialist health services.
This includes health personnel, managers, suppliers, and research and development environments working with AI in the Norwegian health sector. The plan outlines several key expectations for these stakeholders. Organisations must implement robust quality assurance and validation processes for AI systems before deployment, utilising the guidance and frameworks the plan will develop. They are expected to navigate existing legal frameworks—such as medical device regulations, health legislation, and data protection laws—with the help of new cross-agency guidance designed to reduce uncertainty. Health services must also invest in building competence and training for staff involved in selecting, using, and monitoring AI tools. Crucially, all AI deployments must uphold patient safety, privacy, and ethical principles, ensuring transparency and respect for patient rights.
The English version of this plan was published on February 19, 2025, and it outlines measures to be implemented throughout 2024 and 2025. A critical point for product managers and founders is that this plan itself does not introduce new laws or penalties. Instead, it clarifies how existing regulations apply to AI. Enforcement for non-compliance with patient safety, data protection, or medical device rules will continue through established supervisory bodies like the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision and the Norwegian Medicines Agency, under existing statutory frameworks.
A practical pitfall to be aware of is the assumption that this plan creates a new, standalone AI law. In reality, it acts as a crucial guide to help organisations understand and comply with existing legal obligations when integrating AI, rather than imposing entirely new ones. It also aims to prepare the sector for future European Union AI regulations, such as the EU AI Act, by aligning terminology and approaches.
Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.
What you must do — compliance checklist
0 / 7 marked completePlain-English obligations under Norway - AI Plan for Health Services. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
- #1CriticalCompliance Checklist⏰ Before placing on market
Applies to: Providers of AI systems in health and care services.
“Providers are expected to use the plan’s proposed quality assurance framework and validation guidance to assess AI systems before deployment.”
- #2CriticalCompliance Checklist⏰ Before placing on market
Applies to: Providers of AI systems in health and care services.
“Follow cross‑agency regulatory guidance to determine applicability of medical device rules, health legislation and data protection requirements.”
- #3CriticalCompliance Checklist
Applies to: Providers of AI systems in health and care services.
“Providers must ensure patient safety, privacy and ethically appropriate use; the plan emphasises transparency and support to meet statutory obligations.”
- #4ImportantCompliance Checklist
Applies to: Health and care services using AI.
“Health services must ensure competence building for staff involved in selecting, using and monitoring AI.”
- #5ImportantCompliance Checklist⏰ Before placing on market
Applies to: Vendors of AI systems for health and care services.
“Vendors are expected to provide validation documentation and interoperability information.”
- #6ImportantGovernance and Institutional Framework
Applies to: National agencies, regional health authorities, municipal providers.
“The plan... asks that agencies clarify responsibilities that rest with vendors, national bodies and local providers.”
- #7RecommendedKey Focus Areas
Applies to: Providers of AI systems in health and care services.
“preparing providers for EU regulatory developments such as the EU AI Act.”
Related Regulations
Status and proposals for further work with artificial intelligence (KI) in the health and care services (Status og forslag til videre arbeid med kunstig intelligens i helse- og omsorgstjenesten)
Norway97% similar
Felles plan for kunstig intelligens 2020 (Common plan for artificial intelligence 2020)
Norway95% similar
National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (Nasjonal strategi for kunstig intelligens)
Norway92% similar
Artificial Intelligence Act
Norway91% similar
Norway AI Regulation Overview
Norway90% similar
© Regulations.AI — created on 13-Jun-2026