Hallucination
When an AI (often a generative model) produces fluent but factually incorrect, fabricated, or unsupported outputs presented as if true.
Definitions (4)
Outputs produced by a generative model that are plausible in form but incorrect, fabricated, or unsupported by evidence; identified as a key safety risk to be measured, tested, and mitigated through evaluation and alignment work.
A phenomenon where a generative model produces outputs that are coherent or convincing but factually incorrect or unsupported by training data; the Guidebook treats this as a key risk to monitor, test for, and mitigate.
Model outputs that appear coherent or credible but are factually incorrect, fabricated, or unsupported by evidence—examples include invented citations or falsified data. The Guide requires researchers to detect, correct, and not rely on hallucinated content in scientific work.
A model-generated output that appears coherent or plausible yet is false, unfounded, or not supported by the model's training data or factual sources. The Playbook treats hallucinations as an operational risk to be identified, measured, and mitigated through testing, evaluation and user-facing disclosures.
Related Terms
Confabulation
Instances where GAI systems generate factually incorrect, nonsensical, or inconsistent outputs presented as truthful....
Generative AI
A class of AI systems that produce new digital content (text, image, audio, video, code) by modelling and emulating patterns in training data....
Data Quality
The fitness of dataset(s) for an AI system’s intended purpose, judged by attributes like relevance, accuracy, representativeness, completeness and provenance....