Argentina State AI Laws Overview

Overview

Subnational AI regulation in Argentina is characterized by proactive regulatory measures implemented at the provincial and municipal judicial levels. Rather than relying on a single omnibus state law, Argentinian jurisdictions have addressed artificial intelligence through specialized executive guidelines and formal judicial protocols. Key regulatory instruments have been established across major jurisdictions, including the Province of Buenos Aires, the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), Jujuy, Río Negro, and San Juan.

These subnational regulatory actions focus primarily on two primary administrative domains: public administration services and judicial branch operations. By establishing ethical parameters, prior authorization mechanisms, and clear standards for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), provincial authorities aim to modernize state infrastructure while protecting personal data and democratic principles.

Regulatory Approach

The regulatory approach across Argentinian states relies on institutional guidelines, judicial acordadas, and executive resolutions rather than punitive statutory codes. Authorities prioritize governance frameworks that enforce human oversight (human-in-the-loop), transparency, algorithmic liability, and risk management prior to system adoption.

A recurring feature of subnational frameworks is the explicit distinction between AI as an supportive efficiency tool and AI as an autonomous decision-maker. State measures consistently restrict AI systems from replacing human judgment, particularly within judicial contexts and administrative decision-making.

Key State Legislation

Subnational AI regulations in Argentina recorded in the regulatory corpus include:

• Buenos Aires Province Generative AI Guidelines / Resolution 4/2025: Enacted on February 10, 2025, by the Undersecretariat of Digital Government within the Ministry of Government, this decree establishes mandatory guidelines for the ethical and secure use of Generative AI across all provincial public administration entities. It mandates human oversight, data anonymization, continuous personnel training, prior authorization, clear labeling of AI content, and risk impact assessments.
• City of Buenos Aires Resolution N° 206/2025: Adopted in February 2025 by the Judiciary of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, this resolution provides guidelines for AI integration in judicial processes, prioritizing fundamental rights, mitigation of bias and errors, and human oversight.
• Jujuy AI Judicial Protocol (Acordada N° 31/2025): A foundational protocol approved by the Judicial Power of Jujuy, establishing an authorization framework, evaluation criteria, human oversight, and mandatory training for integrating AI tools into court proceedings.
• Río Negro Generative AI Protocol (2024): Approved by the Superior Tribunal de Justicia of Río Negro, this protocol governs GenAI use by judicial personnel and external auxiliaries, requiring data protection, mitigating hallucinations and bias, prohibiting automated judicial rulings, and providing for sanctions in cases of misuse.
• San Juan AI Judicial Protocol (2024): Established by the Court of Justice of San Juan, this regulation sets mandatory transparency requirements and human-in-the-loop oversight for algorithmic decision-support tools used by judges and court staff.

Enforcement Bodies

Enforcement and oversight responsibilities are decentralized and managed by state-level executive departments and judicial leadership bodies within each respective province. In Buenos Aires Province, the primary authority responsible for public administration compliance is the Undersecretariat of Digital Government, operating within the Ministry of Government.

Within state judiciaries, supervisory authority is held directly by the highest provincial courts and court administrative presidencies. These oversight entities include the Superior Tribunal de Justicia of Río Negro, the Court of Justice of San Juan, the Presidencia of the CABA Judiciary, and the Judicial Power of Jujuy.

Penalties & Enforcement

Enforcement mechanisms across Argentinian state frameworks operate primarily through internal administrative governance, mandatory prior evaluation, and institutional disciplinary rules. For instance, the Río Negro judicial protocol includes explicit provisions for administrative sanctions against personnel and external auxiliaries in cases of misuse or failure to comply with ethical standards.

In public administration settings, such as Buenos Aires Province, compliance is enforced through mandatory prior authorization procedures and strict technical requirements for data anonymization and content labeling. The corpus holds no record of external statutory monetary fine frameworks or criminal penalties beyond these administrative and judicial compliance measures.

Sector Focus Areas

State-level regulation in Argentina focuses primarily on two key sectors: public administration and the judicial system. Within public administration, regulations focus on operational transparency, protection of confidential personal data, mandatory staff training, and preliminary risk assessments before deploying generative AI models.

In the judicial sector, regulations across CABA, Jujuy, Río Negro, and San Juan focus on maintaining the integrity of court decisions. These protocols permit AI deployment to optimize procedural efficiency while strictly preventing automated algorithms from issuing judicial rulings or supplanting human judges.

National/Federal Alignment

The state AI regulations documented in the corpus consist exclusively of provincial executive resolutions and judicial branch frameworks. The corpus holds no record of national or federal AI statutes, federal executive orders, or national risk alignment frameworks in Argentina.

Subnational authorities have consequently designed localized frameworks tailored directly to provincial judicial systems and public administration requirements, ensuring alignment with provincial legal standards and fundamental constitutional rights.

Notable Provisions

Argentinian state regulations contain several pioneering provisions governing public sector AI deployment:

• Absolute Prohibition of Automated Judicial Rulings: Protocols such as Río Negro's explicitly prohibit AI models from making final judicial decisions, reinforcing human judgment as an indispensable legal requirement.
• Mandatory Content Labeling and Data Anonymization: Buenos Aires Province Resolution 4/2025 mandates that all AI-generated content in public administration be clearly labeled as such, accompanied by strict personal data anonymization rules prior to model input.
• Pre-Deployment Evaluation Frameworks: Protocols in Jujuy and Buenos Aires Province require formal evaluation and prior authorization before AI tools can be legally implemented in public or judicial workflows.

Future Developments

The subnational AI framework in Argentina reflects active implementation of measures established between 2024 and 2025. Institutional focus remains centered on enforcing mandatory personnel training, conducting impact assessments, and monitoring judicial compliance across participating provinces.

The provided corpus holds no record of pending legislative bills or proposed amendments beyond the active enforcement of the existing judicial protocols and executive resolutions across Buenos Aires, CABA, Jujuy, Río Negro, and San Juan.