Belgium - National AI Coalition
AI4Belgium (Belgian national AI coalition / roadmap)
Belgium
RAI-BE-NA-ABNACXX-2019Belgium - National AI Coalition is Adopted in Belgium as of 9 Sep 2026, according to ai4belgium.be.
PolicyGovernance and OversightRisk ManagementTransparency and DisclosureThe AI4Belgium national roadmap, created in 2019 by FPS Policy and Support (BOSA) and regional partners, sets out strategic priorities to guide Belgian public and private entities in adopting trustworthy AI. Currently adopted, this policy establishes cross-sector working groups and assessment tools to align national practices with EU standards.
Summary
AI4Belgium is a coordinated national initiative and coalition launched to build and showcase Belgium’s AI ecosystem, accelerate responsible public and private adoption of artificial intelligence, and provide a single point of engagement between federal and regional governments, industry, academia and civil society. Conceived as a national hub and roadmap rather than binding legislation, AI4Belgium sets out cross-cutting strategic priorities: creating an observatory to track AI deployment and maturity, promoting best practices for trustworthy AI, supporting SMEs and public services to adopt AI tools responsibly, upskilling the workforce, and aligning national activities with European AI governance and standards. The coalition brings together federal actors (notably FPS Policy and Support / BOSA), the regional AI hubs (e.g., The Beacon, Digityser, Réseau IA), industry federations (such as Agoria), major research centres (including imec), and community initiatives under a shared platform and programme activities. Key instruments under the AI4Belgium umbrella include public outreach and capacity-building programmes, tools for trustworthiness assessment (an ALTAI-based assessment tool), guidance on responsible procurement and generative AI in government, and the creation of cross-sector working groups (health, industry, mobility, public services) to pilot AI use-cases and sandbox activities. While the coalition and roadmap are strategic and non-coercive in nature, AI4Belgium is explicitly designed to operate alongside existing regulatory frameworks — including the GDPR, sectoral safety and health regulation, and forthcoming EU AI regulatory instruments — and to prepare Belgian stakeholders for compliance with evolving EU obligations. Implementation relies on collaborative governance, voluntary adoption of assessment and transparency practices, targeted public funding to accelerate adoption in SMEs and research, and monitoring via an observatory that publishes indicators and reports on AI uptake, skills and digital infrastructure. AI4Belgium places a strong emphasis on ethical and human-centric principles: preserving fundamental rights, fairness and non-discrimination, data protection and privacy, model security and robustness, and transparency for public-facing systems. The strategy also emphasizes international alignment and contribution to EU initiatives such as ALTAI/AI assessment frameworks, Digital Innovation Hubs, AI factories, and EU-level standardisation efforts. Because it is a coalition/strategy rather than a law, enforcement primarily operates through existing legal instruments and through reputational, procurement and funding levers rather than prescriptive sanctions embedded in the roadmap.
Full article
Read full text ↗Overview
AI4Belgium is a national coalition and strategic roadmap that organises public, private and academic AI stakeholders in Belgium to champion responsible, human-centred AI deployment. Launched as a collaborative platform under the coordination of the federal Policy and Support service and with active participation from regional hubs and industry bodies, AI4Belgium serves three complementary roles: convenor and network, national observatory and monitoring platform, and practical guidance hub for trustworthy AI tools and processes. The initiative has produced public-facing materials, assessment tools and events and is referenced in EU-level reporting on national AI ecosystems (see EU Digital Decade country report for Belgium). AI4Belgium maintains online resources, including an ALTAI-based trustworthiness assessment tool and a coalition website used for outreach and publication of the roadmap and updates.
Definitions
For the purposes of AI4Belgium and the associated roadmap the following working definitions are used: "AI ecosystem" — the combined set of actors (public administrations, private companies, civil society, research centres) engaged in AI development, deployment and governance; "Trustworthy AI" — AI designed and implemented in accordance with ethical principles including human oversight, fairness, transparency and robustness; "Observatory" — a monitoring mechanism producing indicators, case studies and periodic updates on AI uptake and impacts; "AI sandbox / pilot" — controlled, time-limited environment where stakeholders can experiment with AI innovations under supervised conditions. These definitions are operational and intended to align with EU policy language while reflecting Belgian administrative practice.
Governance and Institutional Framework
AI4Belgium is governed as a coalition model rather than through statutory command-and-control. Coordination is led at federal level (FPS Policy & Support / BOSA) working with the three regional AI hubs (The Beacon in Flanders, Digityser in Brussels and Réseau IA in Wallonia), industry federations (notably Agoria), research organisations (e.g., imec) and civic actors. Institutional roles include: a national coordination secretariat to run the observatory and events; working groups for sectoral pilots (health, mobility, industry, public services); and a technical team maintaining open-source tools such as the ALTAI-derived assessment platform (hosted examples include ALTAI assessment tool). Governance relies on memoranda of cooperation, funding agreements and voluntary commitments — not new statutory authorities — though public procurement and grant-making are used to incentivise adoption of responsible AI practices. The model emphasises horizontal cooperation across jurisdictional levels and rapid dissemination of technical guidance to public administrations.
Key Focus Areas
AI4Belgium’s roadmap concentrates activity across several strategic pillars: capacity and skills (reskilling and upskilling programmes for public servants and industry, university and vocational training linkages); trustworthy AI adoption (promoting ALTAI-based assessments and transparency reports for public-facing systems); data and infrastructure (improving FAIR data availability, secure data sharing arrangements and access to HPC/cloud resources for research and SMEs); sectoral pilots and sandboxes (healthcare, transport, manufacturing and public administration pilots to test governance and safety mechanisms); SME and innovation support (targeted coaching, funding instruments and linking SMEs to Digital Innovation Hubs); ethics, rights and safety (embedding privacy-by-design, non-discrimination and human oversight in procurement and deployment); and international cooperation (alignment with EU regulatory pathways and participation in EU projects such as EDIHs and AI Factories). The coalition places special emphasis on lowering barriers for SMEs and public bodies to responsibly adopt AI by offering assessment tooling, best-practice templates and facilitated connections to research partners.
Implementation Framework
Implementation is organised through a mix of voluntary commitments, public funding calls, working groups, observatory reporting and technical tool deployment. The federal secretariat publishes guidance and operational recommendations for public procurement of AI and encourages public administrations to adopt ALTAI-style self-assessments and transparency measures. Regional partners run localized adoption programmes and training; industry partners provide case studies and sandbox partners host pilots. Funding channels include regional innovation grants, participation in EU funding streams and targeted federal calls aimed at bridging experimentation and deployment (particularly for SMEs). Technical implementation also includes the provision of open-source assessment tools (see the ALTAI tool hosted by the coalition) and shared datasets / sandboxes under strict privacy and security controls. The implementation model intentionally avoids duplicative regulatory requirements and instead prepares stakeholders for compliance with binding EU instruments while filling gaps in practical guidance and capacity.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring is performed via the AI4Belgium Observatory which collects indicators on AI uptake (enterprise adoption rates, sectoral case studies), skills metrics, pilot outcomes and alignment with trustworthy AI criteria. The observatory publishes periodic summaries and contributes to EU reporting mechanisms (for instance the national inputs to EU country-level digital strategy reports). Evaluation is both quantitative (adoption percentages, number of pilots, training completions) and qualitative (case study assessments, stakeholder feedback). The coalition encourages transparency by recommending publication of algorithmic impact assessments for high-impact public systems and regular self-assessments by participating organisations; those outputs feed back into the observatory’s reporting cycle to inform iterative updates to the roadmap.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
As a strategic coalition, AI4Belgium itself does not create new administrative penalties; it operates alongside Belgium’s existing legal regime (notably the GDPR and sector-specific safety and liability frameworks). Where obligations arise (for example through procurement conditions or grant agreements that reference AI4Belgium best practices), non-compliance may trigger contractual remedies, funding clawbacks, or procurement sanctions. Liability for harms caused by AI systems continues to be determined under existing civil liability law and sectoral law, and actors are advised to consult relevant national and EU liability workstreams. Appeals relating to administrative decisions linked to public procurement or funding adopt the standard administrative and judicial remedies available under Belgian law.
Relationship to Other Instruments
AI4Belgium is explicitly positioned to complement existing legal instruments rather than replace them. It aligns with the GDPR for data protection and privacy; references EU ethical guidance such as the European Commission’s ALTAI tool and contributes practical implementation support for preparedness with respect to the EU AI Act and other forthcoming EU measures. At the national level, the roadmap coordinates with regional digital strategies and sectoral regulators (healthcare, transport, financial supervision) to ensure pilots and guidance are consistent with sector-specific safety, health and consumer protection rules.
International Alignment
International alignment is core to AI4Belgium’s objectives: the coalition participates in EU-level initiatives (Digital Innovation Hubs, AI Factories, ALT-EDIC networks), adopts ALTAI/alignment with European Commission guidance, and supports Belgian contributions to European standardisation and research projects. The observatory supports interoperability and data-sharing practices that facilitate cross-border research and governance cooperation. AI4Belgium thereby acts as a national focal point for EU and international collaboration on trustworthy AI adoption.
Implementation Timeline
| Year / Phase | Milestone |
|---|---|
| 2019 (Inception) | Coalition formation and launch of national hub concept; initial stakeholder network and roadmap publication (coalition-led, non-binding). |
| 2020–2021 | Creation and deployment of assessment tooling, first sectoral pilots and public outreach; establishment of observatory baseline metrics. |
| 2022–2024 | Expansion of SME support, integration with regional AI hubs and participation in EU Digital Innovation Hub activities; publication of periodic observatory reports and cross-sector case studies. |
| 2025 onward | Continuous monitoring, alignment with EU regulatory developments and scaling of sandboxes and training; readiness support for public administrations for compliance with EU AI Act obligations. |
Sources and References
| Source | Type |
|---|---|
| AI4Belgium official website | Primary Source |
| ALTAI-based assessment tool (AI4Belgium) | Primary Source |
| Agoria press article: AI4Belgium coalition launches national AI hub | Primary Source |
| EU Digital Decade country report: Belgium (references AI4Belgium) | Secondary / Official EU report |
Requirements for a company
What an organisation has to do under Belgium - National AI Coalition, at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.
Not yet in force (Adopted). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.
Must do
0Nothing in this category.
Must not do
0Nothing in this category.
Should do
6- Conduct ALTAI-based trustworthiness self-assessments when deploying public-facing AI systems.Public administrations and organisations deploying AI
- Publish algorithmic impact assessments for high-impact public AI systems.Public sector bodies deploying high-impact AI systems
- Adopt transparency measures and public reporting for public-facing AI applications.Public sector bodies deploying AI systems
- Embed privacy-by-design, non-discrimination, and human oversight in AI procurement and deployment.Organisations procuring or deploying AI systems
- Implement FAIR data principles and secure data-sharing arrangements for AI research and development.Organisations managing data infrastructures for AI
- Perform regular self-assessments and feed evaluation outputs into the national AI observatory.Organisations participating in the AI4Belgium network
Should not do
0Nothing in this category.
Who must do what
The obligations under Belgium - National AI Coalition, most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
| # | Who | Requirement | By when | Where | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public administrations and organisations deploying AI | Conduct ALTAI-based trustworthiness self-assessments when deploying public-facing AI systems. “promoting ALTAI-based assessments and transparency reports for public-facing systems” | — | Key Focus Areas | Recommended |
| 2 | Public sector bodies deploying high-impact AI systems | Publish algorithmic impact assessments for high-impact public AI systems. “recommending publication of algorithmic impact assessments for high-impact public systems” | — | Monitoring and Evaluation | Recommended |
| 3 | Public sector bodies deploying AI systems | Adopt transparency measures and public reporting for public-facing AI applications. “encourages public administrations to adopt ALTAI-style self-assessments and transparency measures” | — | Implementation Framework | Recommended |
| 4 | Organisations procuring or deploying AI systems | Embed privacy-by-design, non-discrimination, and human oversight in AI procurement and deployment. “embedding privacy-by-design, non-discrimination and human oversight in procurement and deployment” | — | Key Focus Areas | Recommended |
| 5 | Organisations managing data infrastructures for AI | Implement FAIR data principles and secure data-sharing arrangements for AI research and development. “improving FAIR data availability, secure data sharing arrangements and access to HPC/cloud resources” | — | Key Focus Areas | Recommended |
| 6 | Organisations participating in the AI4Belgium network | Perform regular self-assessments and feed evaluation outputs into the national AI observatory. “regular self-assessments by participating organisations; those outputs feed back into the observatory’s reporting cycle” | — | Monitoring and Evaluation | Recommended |
Related Regulations
More AI regulation in Belgium
© Regulations.AI · updated on 20 Sep 2026 · reviewed against official sources on 9 Sep 2026 using Gemini 3.6 Flash