Switzerland - AI Guidelines

Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence for the Federal Administration

Leitlinien «Künstliche Intelligenz» für den Bund

Switzerland

RAI-CH-NA-GAIFAXX-2020
Adopted(Adopted)
GuidelineGovernance and OversightAccountability and Documentation
Export PDF

Adopted by the Federal Council on 25 November 2020, the Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence for the Confederation provide a non-binding, administrative orientation framework for the development, procurement and use of AI within the Swiss federal administration. The document sets out seven guiding principles — human-centred design, enabling regulatory conditions, transparency, accountability, safety, active international governance engagement, and stakeholder inclusion — and instructs federal bodies to integrate these principles into sectoral strategies, procurement and operations.

Overview

The Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence for the Confederation, adopted by the Swiss Federal Council on 25 November 2020, present a non-binding orientation framework that the Federal Administration should apply when developing, procuring and operating AI systems. They were drafted by an interdepartmental working group under the lead of the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI / SBFI) and published as part of a broader set of federal AI activities and reports. The Guidelines define seven high-level principles — human-centred design, enabling regulatory conditions, transparency and explainability, accountability, safety and robustness, active international engagement, and broad stakeholder inclusion — and recommend concrete administrative practices such as risk-based impact assessment, documentation and traceability, data quality standards, and adherence to privacy and security obligations. The original German-language PDF and the Federal Chancellery explanatory page are primary references. See the official guidelines (PDF) and the BK (Federal Chancellery) overview for full text and context: Guidelines ‘Künstliche Intelligenz’ (PDF, 25.11.2020) and BK — Künstliche Intelligenz.

Definitions

The Guidelines use operational definitions aligned to international work: "AI" as a set of technologies enabling automated analysis, pattern recognition, or decision support including machine learning and statistical modelling; "AI systems" as software or integrated solutions that employ such methods to support or replace human tasks; "automated decision-making" as processes where systems produce outputs that affect people or organisational processes. The document emphasises functional, technology-neutral definitions and situates them within Swiss constitutional protections and international human-rights instruments. Specific sectoral annexes adapt these definitions for contexts such as education, research and public services.

Governance and Institutional Framework

The Guidelines place responsibility for implementation on the line federal offices and agencies that design, procure or operate AI systems and assign a coordinating and monitoring role to the Federal Office of Communications (BAKOM). They were prepared under the leadership of the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI / SBFI) and endorsed by the Federal Council, and the Federal Chancellery (DTI) is tasked with digital-transformation coordination. To support cross-cutting governance, a federal Competence Network for Artificial Intelligence (CNAI) was subsequently created as a forum and operational instrument for knowledge sharing, development of practical guidance and internal coordination. The Guidelines recommend establishing clear internal responsibilities, review bodies and audit trails so that legal compliance and rights-protection can be demonstrated. For further institutional context see the BK coordination page and the SBFI AI policy page: BK — Künstliche Intelligenz and SBFI — Künstliche Intelligenz.

Key Focus Areas

The Guidelines emphasise several practical focus areas: human-centred AI and the protection of fundamental rights (privacy, non-discrimination and dignity); fostering innovation through proportionate and technology-neutral regulatory conditions; transparency, traceability and explainability of AI systems (including the disclosure of AI use in administrative decisions and documenting training data where legally permissible); accountability and clearly assigned liability (the Guidelines stress that responsibility cannot be delegated to machines); safety, robustness and resilience (technical and organisational security measures and lifecycle risk management); and active involvement in international standard-setting and governance processes. They also call for sectoral adaptations (education, health, transport, public services) and recommend concrete administrative tools such as regulatory impact assessments, data governance and internal procurement standards. The guidelines expressly cross-reference OECD AI principles and relevant Council of Europe and EU work as reference points.

Implementation Framework

Implementation is delegated to federal offices and the agencies entrusted with administrative tasks. The Guidelines advise that offices embed the principles into procurement rules, project governance, procurement contracts (including vendor requirements for documentation and data handling), system lifecycle risk assessment, and staff training. Where AI may touch fundamental rights or critical public interests, offices should conduct impact assessments (privacy, equality, security), define human-in-the-loop arrangements, and prepare mitigation and remediation measures. The Guidelines also call for the establishment of monitoring mechanisms at BAKOM and the creation of sectoral guidance as required. Practical follow-ups include the CNAI fact sheets and operational guidance for employees (for example, guidance issued for generative-AI use in federal work).

Monitoring and Evaluation

The Federal Office of Communications (BAKOM), together with concerned federal offices and supported by the CNAI, is responsible for periodic monitoring of the application and relevance of the Guidelines. The Guidelines prescribe bi- or multi-annual stock-taking and recommend reporting on experiences, challenges and suggested updates. BAKOM conducted a first evaluation in 2022 which concluded that the Guidelines remain applicable and relevant; further reviews and possible updates are envisaged. Monitoring combines qualitative feedback from offices, centralised inventories of AI projects, evaluations of sectoral guidance needs, and the publication of succinct internal fact sheets to address rapid technological change (for example, new guidance on generative AI tools in 2024).

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

As a non-binding framework, the Guidelines themselves do not prescribe statutory penalties; they are an administrative instrument to guide federal practice. Liability and penalties for unlawful use of AI in the federal context remain governed by applicable laws (constitutional guarantees, data-protection law, administrative law and sectoral statutes). The Guidelines stress that responsibilities and liability must be clearly assigned to human actors or organisational units, and that administrative remedies or disciplinary measures may apply where internal rules or legal obligations are breached. In practice, enforcement takes place via existing administrative oversight, sectoral regulators where applicable, internal audits and the Swiss data-protection authority for DSG-related infringements.

Relationship to Other Instruments

The Guidelines are intentionally non-statutory and operate alongside (and within) the Swiss legal order: the Federal Constitution, federal statutes (including data-protection law), sectoral regulation, and international obligations. They reference the 2019 interdepartmental AI report "Challenges of Artificial Intelligence", the Digital Switzerland strategy and foreign-policy digital strategy (2021–2024) as contextual documents. The document explicitly draws on and aligns with international soft-law instruments and principles (OECD AI Principles, Council of Europe and EU initiatives) to ensure coherence in domestic application and international engagement.

International Alignment

Switzerland’s approach in the Guidelines is technology-neutral and oriented to international cooperation. The Guidelines call for active Swiss participation in multilateral forums (UNO, OECD, ITU, UNESCO, Council of Europe and relevant EU processes) to shape global standards. They explicitly link domestic federal practice to international human-rights obligations and to transnational standard-setting so as to avoid regulatory fragmentation while protecting rights. Switzerland’s subsequent policy actions have continued to reference EU and OECD work as it develops, and the Guidelines serve as the baseline for engagement in international rule-making and reciprocal recognition of standards.

Implementation Timeline

EventDateNotes
Federal Council adoption and publication of Guidelines2020-11-25Adopted by the Federal Council; official PDF published.
First formal monitoring / evaluation (BAKOM)2022-10-01BAKOM evaluation (autumn 2022) concluded Guidelines remain relevant.
Establishment and activation of CNAI (Competence Network for AI)2022-12-01Federal competence network operationalised to support coordination and guidance.
Publication of generative-AI fact sheets for federal employees2024-01-18Practical guidance on the use of generative-AI tools in Federal Administration work.

Compliance Checklist

Checklist ItemYes/NoNotes
Has the office performed a rights/impact assessment where AI affects people?YesUse privacy and non-discrimination checks; follow internal RFA-style tools.
Is data governance and quality documented?YesEnsure datasets are fit-for-purpose and documented consistent with law.
Are human oversight and accountability clearly assigned?YesAssign responsible organisational unit and maintain audit trails.
Is there a record of technical and organisational security measures?YesFollow IT-security and resilience standards; document logs and incident response.

Sources and References

SourceType
Leitlinien «Künstliche Intelligenz» für den Bund (PDF, 25.11.2020)Primary Source
Federal Chancellery (BK) — Künstliche IntelligenzPrimary Source / Official Guidance
SBFI — Künstliche Intelligenz (SERI / SBFI pages)Primary Source / Context
Plain English

This Swiss guideline provides a non-binding framework for the federal administration on how to develop, procure, and use artificial intelligence (AI) systems, applying to all federal offices and agencies involved in these activities.

Adopted on November 25, 2020, the guidelines emphasize seven core principles. Among the most important for practical application are: - Ensuring AI systems are human-centred and protect fundamental rights like privacy and non-discrimination. - Promoting transparency, traceability, and explainability, which means disclosing when AI is used in administrative decisions and documenting training data. - Maintaining clear accountability, stressing that responsibility for AI outcomes cannot be delegated to machines but must remain with human actors or organisational units. - Ensuring the safety, robustness, and resilience of AI systems through technical and organisational security measures.

Federal offices are expected to integrate these principles into their existing operations, including procurement rules, project governance, and staff training. This means conducting impact assessments when AI might affect fundamental rights, defining human oversight mechanisms, and ensuring data quality.

A key surprise for many might be that these guidelines are *non-binding*. They do not introduce new statutory penalties. Instead, enforcement relies on existing legal frameworks, such as constitutional guarantees, data protection law, and administrative law. Any liability or penalties for unlawful AI use would fall under these existing laws, with responsibility always assigned to human or organisational units. The Federal Office of Communications (BAKOM) monitors the application of these guidelines, and a Competence Network for Artificial Intelligence (CNAI) supports coordination and practical guidance, including recent advice on generative AI tools.

The practical pitfall is that federal bodies must actively embed these principles into their daily work and existing legal compliance, rather than waiting for a standalone AI law.

Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.

What you must do — compliance checklist

0 / 11 marked complete

Plain-English obligations under Switzerland - AI Guidelines. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

  1. #1CriticalImplementation FrameworkBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    Where AI may touch fundamental rights or critical public interests, offices should conduct impact assessments (privacy, equality, security).
  2. #2CriticalKey Focus AreasBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    accountability and clearly assigned liability (the Guidelines stress that responsibility cannot be delegated to machines).
  3. #3CriticalKey Focus AreasBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    safety, robustness and resilience (technical and organisational security measures and lifecycle risk management).
  4. #4CriticalOverviewBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    recommend concrete administrative practices such as... data quality standards, and adherence to privacy and security obligations.
  5. #5ImportantKey Focus AreasBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    transparency, traceability and explainability of AI systems (including the disclosure of AI use in administrative decisions).
  6. #6ImportantKey Focus AreasBefore making decisions

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies using AI for administrative decisions.

    transparency, traceability and explainability of AI systems (including the disclosure of AI use in administrative decisions).
  7. #7ImportantImplementation FrameworkBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    define human-in-the-loop arrangements, and prepare mitigation and remediation measures.
  8. #8ImportantImplementation FrameworkBefore placing on market

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing, procuring, or operating AI systems.

    define human-in-the-loop arrangements, and prepare mitigation and remediation measures.
  9. #9ImportantImplementation FrameworkBefore procurement

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies procuring AI systems.

    offices embed the principles into procurement rules, project governance, procurement contracts.
  10. #10RecommendedImplementation Framework

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies using AI systems.

    offices embed the principles into... staff training.
  11. #11RecommendedKey Focus AreasBefore deployment

    Applies to: Federal offices and agencies developing AI systems.

    documenting training data where legally permissible.

© Regulations.AI — created on 13-Jun-2026