China - Data Security Law (2021)

Data Security Law of the People's Republic of China

中华人民共和国数据安全法

China

RAI-CN-NA-DSPRCXX-2021
Effective: 1 Sep 2021
In Force(In Force)Checked 9 Sep 2026

China - Data Security Law (2021) is In Force in China as of 9 Sep 2026, according to gov.cn.

ActRisk ManagementGovernance and OversightData Protection and Privacy
Export PDF

The Data Security Law (Presidential Order No. 84), adopted in 2021 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, mandates risk management and transfer controls for data processors in China. In force since September 1, 2021, the law is coordinated by the Cyberspace Administration of China and supervised by sectoral ministries.

Summary

The Data Security Law of the People's Republic of China remains in force as of September 9, 2026. Adopted by the Standing Committee of the 13th National People's Congress on June 10, 2021, and promulgated under Presidential Order No. 84, the Law officially entered into force on September 1, 2021. Important implementing regulations, such as the Cyberspace Administration of China's Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers, were subsequently adopted on July 7, 2022.

Supervision and enforcement are divided among designated state authorities. Industry and sectoral competent ministries—including those for industry, telecommunications, transportation, finance, natural resources, healthcare, education, and science—supervise data security in their respective sectors. Public security organs and national security organs handle security oversight and investigations within their statutory mandates. The national cyberspace authority, specifically the Cyberspace Administration of China, coordinates overall network data security and supervision. The Central National Security leadership organ coordinates national data security strategies and important data cataloging.

Enforcing bodies are empowered to conduct regulatory interviews, issue warnings, order rectifications, impose administrative fines of up to 2 million RMB for important data violations or up to 5 million RMB for core state data breaches, suspend business operations, and revoke business licenses or permits. Data processors must implement full-process data security management, conduct periodic risk assessments, report data incidents, and refrain from providing China-stored data to foreign judicial or law enforcement bodies without authorization from competent PRC authorities.

The Data Security Law operates alongside the Cybersecurity Law and Personal Information Protection Law as a core pillar of China's legal infrastructure for data governance. It sets a tiered protection regime for important data and core state data, governs government data security, regulates data trading intermediaries, and enforces national security reviews over data processing activities that impact or may impact national security.

Full article

Read full text ↗

Overview

The Data Security Law (DSL) of the People's Republic of China, adopted on June 10, 2021 and in force from September 1, 2021, establishes a national legal framework to regulate data processing, ensure data security and promote data development and utilization. The text defines data broadly and creates a classification and graded protection system that distinguishes "important data" and "core state data," imposes obligations on data processors (including designation of responsible persons and regular risk assessments), and requires a national data security review for activities affecting national security. The law also clarifies responsibilities for government data and cross-border matters. The official promulgation notice and full Chinese text are published on the central government portal: Gov.cn Promulgation Notice.

Definitions

The DSL adopts expansive definitions central to scope and obligations: "data" means any record of information in electronic or other forms; "data processing" includes collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision and disclosure; "data security" means ensuring data is effectively protected and lawfully used through necessary measures and having the capacity to guarantee continuous security; "important data" and "core state data" are categories determined by importance to national security, economic lifelines, major public interest and people’s livelihoods, with more stringent protection applied to the latter. The law's definitions set the baseline for classification, risk assessment and obligations imposed on processors.

Governance and Institutional Framework

The DSL assigns roles across national institutions. The central national security authority leads decision-making and coordination of national data security policy; the national data security work coordination mechanism conducts overall planning and coordinates departments. Sectoral supervisory responsibilities are allocated to ministries (e.g., industrial, telecoms, transport, finance, natural resources, health, education, technology) while public security and national security organs exercise oversight in their legally defined domains. The national cyberspace affairs department (Cyberspace Administration of China) is charged with overall planning and coordination of network data security and related supervision. The law also contemplates participation by industry associations, standards bodies and professional testing and certification institutions. Authoritative text sources include the official publication on Gov.cn Promulgation Notice and the NRA Official PDF Gazette.

Key Focus Areas

The DSL’s principal regulatory pillars include: (1) Classification and graded protection: data are classified by importance and potential harm if tampered with or leaked; (2) Protection obligations for processors of "important data": designated responsible persons, data security bodies, routine risk assessments and reporting obligations; (3) National-level risk monitoring, early-warning and emergency response mechanisms requiring coordinated information sharing and incident reporting; (4) A national security review system to assess data processing activities that may affect national security; (5) Controls on cross-border transfer of important data and coordination with the Cybersecurity Law and CAC measures to require security assessment or other compliance paths for outbound transfers; (6) Regulation of data trade and intermediaries, requiring source verification and retention of transaction records; (7) Government data governance balancing openness and confidentiality obligations for government-collected data; (8) Encouragement of standards, testing, evaluation and accreditation for products and services related to data security. The law is intentionally broad to be implemented through follow-on measures and departmental rules; see the DSL text and implementing measures by relevant agencies for operational details (NPC; CAC measures are issued separately by the national cyberspace authority).

Implementation Framework

Implementation rests on a combination of national-level coordination and sectoral supervision. The DSL instructs the national coordination mechanism to compile catalogs of important data and requires localities, departments and industries to prepare their important data lists for prioritized protection. Processors of important data must establish institutional arrangements for data security, carry out regular risk assessments, and submit reports to competent departments. For outbound transfers, the law defers detailed procedures to the national cyberspace authority in conjunction with other ministries; in practice, the Cybersecurity Law and subsequent CAC measures and standards provide mechanisms for security assessment, standard contracts and certification pathways for cross-border transfers. The DSL also tasks the State Council standardization department and other ministries with developing technical and product standards. Practical compliance therefore involves legal analysis, technical controls, recordkeeping, risk testing/assessment, coordination with regulators and regular internal governance measures.

Monitoring and Evaluation

The DSL establishes centralized monitoring: a unified mechanism for data security risk assessment, reporting, information sharing, monitoring and early warning. The national coordination mechanism is expected to collect, analyze and issue alerts on data security risks; the DSL requires emergency response plans and mandates that competent departments activate emergency measures and publish public warnings when incidents arise. Processors are required to conduct risk monitoring and to report incidents and remedial measures, and the law authorizes regulators to require periodic reports (notably for important data processors). The statute also encourages independent third-party testing, evaluation and accreditation services for data security that can contribute to monitoring and evaluation functions.

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

The DSL provides for layered accountability: civil liability for damages caused by breaches of the law; administrative penalties for breaches including fines, orders to rectify, suspension and other administrative sanctions; and criminal liability where conduct constitutes a crime under PRC criminal law. The Law further provides for disciplinary measures against state functionaries who neglect or abuse their data security regulatory duties. Appeals and remedies follow PRC administrative and judicial procedures; organizations and individuals may file complaints with competent departments and protected whistleblower/complainant confidentiality is required by the law.

Relationship to Other Instruments

The DSL operates together with the Cybersecurity Law (2016), the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL, 2021), the National Security Law, the State Secrets Law and various sectoral and departmental regulations. The Cybersecurity Law remains the core statute for CIIO obligations and technical network security grade protections; the PIPL regulates personal information processing rights and obligations and intersects with DSL protections where personal information also constitutes important data; the DSL focuses on national-level data security and the state’s governance over data development and risks. Implementing measures (e.g., CAC measures on cross-border transfers, security assessment rules and standard contractual frameworks) and national standards provide operational guidance for many DSL obligations.

International Alignment

The DSL declares the state will participate in international exchanges and cooperation on data governance and promote safe cross-border data flows, yet it also firmly prioritizes national sovereignty and security. The law includes provisions restricting direct access by foreign judicial or law enforcement bodies to data stored in China without Chinese authority approval. The DSL’s classification regime and national security review, together with CAC cross-border measures, have informed international compliance strategies for multinationals operating in China and interact with global norms on data protection and transfer (notably EU adequacy frameworks, cross-border adequacy discussions and sectoral international standards). Practitioners must reconcile DSL obligations with foreign legal requests and overseas compliance exposure while relying on Chinese administrative routes for lawful cross-border disclosures.

Implementation Timeline

EventDate
Law adopted by NPC Standing Committee2021-06-10
Promulgation / Presidential Order2021-06-10
Law entered into force (effective date)2021-09-01
CAC Measures on Data Export (Measures of Security Assessment for Data Export)2022-07-07 (CAC measures issued; implementation thereafter)
Ongoing: sectoral implementing rules and standards2021–present (refer to CAC, State Council and sectoral ministries)

Sources and References

Official sources and references include the promulgation notice for Presidential Order No. 84 on the central government portal Gov.cn Promulgation Notice and the National Railway Administration published PDF gazette copy NRA Official PDF Gazette.

Requirements for a company

What an organisation has to do under China - Data Security Law (2021), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.

Must do

7
  • Conduct periodic data security risk assessments and submit assessment reports to relevant regulatory authorities.Processors handling important data in China
  • Designate responsible persons for data security and establish a dedicated internal data security management body.Processors of important data in China
  • Pass a regulatory security assessment before transferring important data outside the territory of China.Data processors exporting important data from China
  • Classify data according to statutory protection categories and implement appropriate security safeguard measures.All data processors in China
  • Verify the legal source of data and retain complete transaction records when acting as a data trading intermediary.Data trading intermediaries in China
  • Monitor data security risks, report incidents to authorities immediately, and implement immediate emergency remediation.All data processors in China
  • +1 more in the table below

Must not do

1
  • Do not disclose or provide data stored in China to foreign judicial or law enforcement organs without Chinese government approval.Data processors storing data within China

Should do

1
  • Engage accredited third-party evaluation and testing institutions to verify and strengthen internal data security controls.Data processors in China

Should not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Who must do what

The obligations under China - Data Security Law (2021), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

#WhoRequirementBy whenWhereSeverity
1Data processors storing data within ChinaDo not disclose or provide data stored in China to foreign judicial or law enforcement organs without Chinese government approval.
“restricting direct access by foreign judicial or law enforcement bodies to data stored in China without Chinese authority approval”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
2Processors handling important data in ChinaConduct periodic data security risk assessments and submit assessment reports to relevant regulatory authorities.
“Processors of important data must establish institutional arrangements for data security, carry out regular risk assessments, and submit reports”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
3Processors of important data in ChinaDesignate responsible persons for data security and establish a dedicated internal data security management body.
“Protection obligations for processors of "important data": designated responsible persons, data security bodies”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
4Data processors exporting important data from ChinaPass a regulatory security assessment before transferring important data outside the territory of China.
“require security assessment or other compliance paths for outbound transfers”
Before outbound transfer—Critical
5All data processors in ChinaClassify data according to statutory protection categories and implement appropriate security safeguard measures.
“creates a classification and graded protection system that distinguishes "important data" and "core state data"”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
6Data trading intermediaries in ChinaVerify the legal source of data and retain complete transaction records when acting as a data trading intermediary.
“requiring source verification and retention of transaction records”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
7All data processors in ChinaMonitor data security risks, report incidents to authorities immediately, and implement immediate emergency remediation.
“Processors are required to conduct risk monitoring and to report incidents and remedial measures”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
8Data processors conducting operations affecting Chinese national securityUndergo a national security review for data processing operations that impact or may impact national security.
“A national security review system to assess data processing activities that may affect national security”
Sep 1, 2021—Critical
9Data processors in ChinaEngage accredited third-party evaluation and testing institutions to verify and strengthen internal data security controls.
“encourages independent third-party testing, evaluation and accreditation services for data security”
——Recommended

© Regulations.AI · updated on 20 Sep 2026 · reviewed against official sources on 9 Sep 2026 using Gemini 3.6 Flash