China - AI Development Plan (2017)
Notice of the State Council on Issuing the Development Plan for the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence
Notice of the State Council on Issuing the Development Plan for the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence (New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan)
China
RAI-CN-NA-NSCIDXX-2017China - AI Development Plan (2017) is In Force in China as of 9 Sep 2026, according to gov.cn.
PolicyGovernance and OversightSafety, Testing, and EvaluationConformity Assessment and RegistrationThe New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan establishes China's top-level AI framework and guides domestic public and private sector actors, issued by the State Council of China in 2017. It is currently In Force, taking effect on 2017-07-08, and is coordinated by the Ministry of Science and Technology.
Summary
The Notice of the State Council on Issuing the Development Plan for the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence is currently In Force as China's primary top-level AI policy strategy document. Published on July 20, 2017, following its formal completion on July 8, 2017, the Plan sets national strategic AI development goals spanning three phases up to December 31, 2030. The most recent dated milestone target was December 31, 2025, which focused on major breakthroughs in foundational AI theories and sector leadership, while the final long-term target runs through December 31, 2030.
The Plan outlines a three-step strategic trajectory for China to build an open, collaborative AI technology innovation system and cultivate an intelligent economy and society. The first step targeted 2020 for parity with global advanced levels and initial industry growth. The second step targeted 2025 for fundamental theoretical breakthroughs, wide adoption across healthcare, manufacturing, and smart cities, and the establishment of initial AI legal, ethical, and safety assessment frameworks. The final step targets 2030 for China to become the world's primary AI innovation center, establishing an international leadership position across foundational theory, core technology, and industry scale.
As a strategic policy instrument rather than a statutory act, the Plan itself does not establish administrative fine regimes, statutory penalties, or direct legal liabilities. Implementation oversight and inter-ministerial coordination are led by the Ministry of Science and Technology, which hosts the AI Plan Implementation Promotion Office and Strategic Advisory Committee, while partner organs including the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Cyberspace Administration of China, and the National Development and Reform Commission issue sectoral guidance, manage funding programs, and define technical standards. Binding regulatory enforcement and penalties are administered separately by regulatory agencies through subsequent binding laws and departmental measures.
The Plan establishes priority task clusters spanning basic research, open innovation platforms, intelligent infrastructure, military-civil integration, and risk governance. Supporting mechanisms include fiscal guidance, pilot demonstration zones, and active involvement in international standard-setting fora. It remains the foundational reference guiding China's national AI policy landscape, funding allocations, and downstream governance rules through 2030.
Full article
Read full text ↗Overview
The New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan was completed on July 8, 2017, and publicly released on July 20, 2017, under State Council Notice No. 35 (2017). It functions as China's top-level national strategy for artificial intelligence development rather than a statute, establishing a three-step roadmap targeting 2020, 2025, and 2030. The authoritative text is available on the State Council Policy Repository and the official State Council Release Page.
Definitions
Within the Plan, "new generation artificial intelligence" refers to technologies and systems with capabilities such as deep learning, cross-media perception and reasoning, hybrid human-machine intelligence, swarm intelligence and autonomous decision-making. The document uses policy terms rather than technical legal definitions; it frames AI activities into categories such as foundational research (basic theory and core algorithms), common key technologies (chips, sensors, operating platforms), application systems (industry-specific deployments), intelligent infrastructure (communications, data and high-performance computing), and ecosystem functions (standards, testing, talent and finance). Additionally, the Plan introduces operational constructs: the "1" major national science and technology AI project, and the "N" set of supporting projects and programs across ministries and provincial authorities.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The Plan establishes an institutional architecture for coordination and implementation. It tasks the Ministry of Science and Technology with hosting an AI planning promotion office and creating a strategic advisory committee to provide consultative guidance and evaluation. Other central bodies with assigned roles include the Cyberspace Administration (data, security, content and cross-border data concerns), the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (standards and industrial policy), the National Development and Reform Commission (planning and major projects), the Ministry of Finance (funding guidance), and provincial governments for local implementation. The Plan emphasizes a government-market division of labor: government to plan, coordinate, convene resources and set security/ethical boundaries; markets and enterprises to lead product innovation and commercialization. For central coordination and public dissemination the Plan is hosted on the State Council portal; implementation instructions and follow-up measures are to be issued by relevant departments. See the Plan and implementation office reference at State Council (Chinese) and the English translation hosted by research institutions at New America — translation (PDF).
Key Focus Areas
The Plan organizes six major task clusters. (1) Scientific and technological innovation system: strengthen basic theory, key common technologies, innovation platforms, and high-end talent pools, with open-source sharing encouraged. (2) Intelligent economy and industry: cultivate AI core industries, spur intelligent transformation of traditional sectors (manufacturing, agriculture, transport, finance, healthcare), and establish industrial clusters. (3) Intelligent society: accelerate AI adoption in public services (healthcare, education, elderly care, environment, urban operations, judicial assistance), while highlighting safety, privacy and social governance needs. (4) Military-civil integration: promote two-way conversion of military and civilian AI applications and shared innovation resources. (5) Infrastructure: build pervasive networks (5G and beyond), national data sharing platforms, and high-performance computing ecosystems. (6) Major projects and foresight: deploy a "1+N" program of national-level science and technology projects to address foundational bottlenecks (brain-like computing, autonomous systems, group intelligence, knowledge computing engines). Across these areas the Plan also prioritizes standards, intellectual property protection, pilot demonstrations, and ethical/legal research addressing traceability and accountability.
Implementation Framework
Implementation is to be realized through coordinated central-ministerial tasks, provincial/local rollout, public–private partnerships, targeted funding instruments and dedicated major national projects. The Plan instructs formation of annual and phased implementation plans, establishment of pilot demonstration zones, integration of local industrial resources and investment pools, and scientific project clusters tied to national R&D mechanisms (e.g., National Key R&D Program, NSFC). It stresses fiscal and financial guidance (funds, venture capital incentives), standards development led by MIIT and standards bodies, and development of testing and safety evaluation institutions to provide conformity assessment for critical AI applications. The Plan asks ministries to allocate responsibilities, produce progress metrics, and update the Plan dynamically in response to technological advances.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The Plan mandates periodic monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, including annual assessments and a mid-term review process to check progress against the 2020/2025/2030 milestones. The AI planning office under the Ministry of Science and Technology is assigned coordination responsibility for aggregating national performance indicators (industry scale, technology breakthroughs, talent training, standards adoption), while specific ministries measure sectoral rollout and pilot outcomes. The Plan calls for the development of safety assessment and risk analysis capabilities, creation of metrics for social impacts (employment transformation, privacy and security incidents), and an evidence base to inform dynamic updating of priorities and funding. It also signals the need for public reporting, demonstration case studies and dissemination of replicable policy practices across provinces.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
As a high-level strategy document, the Plan itself does not create a separate enforcement regime or criminal penalties. Instead, it instructs research and formulation of laws, regulations and ethical norms (including traceability, accountability and responsibility assignment) and signals that enforcement will rely on existing legal instruments and subsequent ministerial rules. In practice this means that administrative penalties, license restrictions, funding withdrawal, market access limitations and criminal liability (under pre-existing statutes) can be applied to AI actors who violate specific safety, cybersecurity, data protection or other substantive legal obligations once such statutory rules are adopted. The Plan recommends building traceability and accountability systems to underpin civil liability and administrative measures, and it expects ministries to specify appeals and review mechanisms in implementing rules and pilot programs.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The Plan sits at the apex of China’s AI policy architecture and is explicitly linked to other national initiatives such as industrial policies, the National Key R&D Program, "Made in China 2025" (industrial upgrading), "Internet+" initiatives and subsequent AI-related departmental rules and local government plans. It provides strategic direction rather than operational regulation, and subsequent sectoral regulatory acts (data security, personal information protection, cybersecurity rules, sectoral safety standards) and local implementation plans translate the Plan into concrete obligations. The Plan also set expectations for standard-setting bodies and industry consortia to develop technical standards, conformity assessment schemes and testing capabilities in coordination with MIIT and other departments.
International Alignment
The Plan emphasizes international cooperation on research, standards and governance: it advocates active participation in global R&D networks, norms development, international standard-setting organizations and collaborative projects. While the Plan emphasizes China’s strategic autonomy and national security, it explicitly calls for open-source sharing and global R&D integration to mobilize worldwide innovative resources. That dual posture has guided later Chinese engagement in ISO/ITU and other international standards fora and multilateral policy dialogues on AI ethics and governance.
Implementation Timeline
| Milestone | Target date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Document completed | 2017-07-08 | Plan finalized and assigned for implementation coordination. |
| Public release | 2017-07-20 | Official publication on the State Council portal and dissemination to ministries and local governments. |
| Initial targets | 2020 | AI technologies and applications reach parity with global advanced levels; industry scale expanded. |
| Medium-term targets | 2025 | Major theoretical breakthroughs and some world-leading applications; sectors transformed. |
| Long-term targets | 2030 | Overall world-leading AI capabilities; China a primary global AI innovation center. |
| Annual and mid-term reviews | Annual / Mid-term | Ministries and the AI planning office to conduct regular monitoring and adjustment. |
Sources and References
Official Policy Document: Notice of the State Council on Issuing the Development Plan for the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence (国发〔2017〕35号).
Official Publication Page: State Council Full Text Release of New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan.
Requirements for a company
What an organisation has to do under China - AI Development Plan (2017), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.
Must do
0Nothing in this category.
Must not do
0Nothing in this category.
Should do
6- Build traceability and accountability mechanisms into AI systems to support ethical compliance and risk management.AI developers and enterprises
- Subject critical AI applications to safety evaluations and conformity assessments before wide deployment.Providers of critical AI applications
- Adopt technical standards and testing frameworks developed by national standards bodies and industry consortia.AI enterprises and system developers
- Share core algorithms and technical platforms open-source to support collaborative research and innovation ecosystems.AI research institutions and technology companies
- Participate in global AI research networks and international standard-setting bodies.AI research entities and technology enterprises
- Enable two-way conversion and resource sharing between civilian and military AI innovation projects.AI research institutes and industrial developers
Should not do
0Nothing in this category.
Who must do what
The obligations under China - AI Development Plan (2017), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
| # | Who | Requirement | By when | Where | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI developers and enterprises | Build traceability and accountability mechanisms into AI systems to support ethical compliance and risk management. “recommends building traceability and accountability systems to underpin civil liability and administrative measures” | — | — | Recommended |
| 2 | Providers of critical AI applications | Subject critical AI applications to safety evaluations and conformity assessments before wide deployment. “development of testing and safety evaluation institutions to provide conformity assessment for critical AI applications.” | — | — | Recommended |
| 3 | AI enterprises and system developers | Adopt technical standards and testing frameworks developed by national standards bodies and industry consortia. “standards development led by MIIT and standards bodies, and development of testing and safety evaluation institutions” | — | — | Recommended |
| 4 | AI research institutions and technology companies | Share core algorithms and technical platforms open-source to support collaborative research and innovation ecosystems. “strengthen basic theory, key common technologies, innovation platforms, and high-end talent pools, with open-source sharing encouraged.” | — | — | Recommended |
| 5 | AI research entities and technology enterprises | Participate in global AI research networks and international standard-setting bodies. “advocates active participation in global R&D networks, norms development, international standard-setting organizations and collaborative projects.” | — | — | Recommended |
| 6 | AI research institutes and industrial developers | Enable two-way conversion and resource sharing between civilian and military AI innovation projects. “promote two-way conversion of military and civilian AI applications and shared innovation resources.” | — | — | Recommended |
Related Regulations
More AI regulation in China
AI regulation in China: full overview
- China - Algorithmic Recommendation Regulation (Order No. 9)
- China - Internet Information Synthesis Regulation
- China - Personal Information Protection Law (2021)
- China - Network Data Security Management (Decree No. 790)
- China - Outbound Data Security Measures (2022)
- China AI Regulation Overview
- China - Shanghai - AI Industry Promotion (2022)
- China - Shenzhen - AI Industry Promotion (2022)
© Regulations.AI · updated on 20 Sep 2026 · reviewed against official sources on 9 Sep 2026 using Gemini 3.6 Flash