Maldives - AI Readiness Assessment
UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment Report
Maldives
RAI-MV-NA-UARARXX-2025The UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment Report for the Maldives is a landmark publication launched on July 31, 2025, making the Maldives the first South Asian country to complete UNESCO's AI Readiness Assessment Methodology. The report provides strategic recommendations across five focus areas for ethical and equitable AI development.
Summary
Read full text ↗Plain English
Overview
The UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment Report for the Maldives was officially launched on July 31, 2025, establishing the Maldives as the first country in South Asia to complete UNESCO's AI Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM). Developed jointly by UNESCO and the Government of the Maldives through the National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT), this landmark publication evaluates the country's preparedness for ethical AI adoption across multiple dimensions. The assessment was conducted over ten months by a steering committee representing diverse sectors, providing comprehensive insights into governance, infrastructure, talent, and investment readiness.
Definitions
The assessment employs terminology from UNESCO's AI ethics framework. AI Readiness refers to a country's preparedness to develop, deploy, and govern AI systems ethically and effectively. The Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM) is UNESCO's standardized framework for evaluating national AI readiness across multiple dimensions. Ethical AI encompasses principles of fairness, transparency, accountability, human rights protection, and social benefit. Inclusive AI emphasizes equitable access and representation across all population segments. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) refers to nations with unique challenges including geographic isolation, limited resources, and climate vulnerability.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The assessment was conducted under the leadership of the National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT) within the Ministry of Homeland Security and Technology. UNESCO provided the methodological framework and international expertise. A multisector steering committee brought together government ministries, private sector representatives, academic institutions, and civil society organizations. The assessment recommends establishing an independent AI governance body as the primary regulatory authority and creating a multistakeholder advisory council for ongoing policy guidance. Coordination with the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade ensures alignment with economic objectives.
Key Focus Areas
- AI Governance: Establishing institutional frameworks and regulatory mechanisms for AI oversight.
- Inclusive Oversight: Creating multistakeholder governance structures ensuring diverse participation.
- Talent Development: Building national AI capabilities through education and training programs.
- Knowledge Infrastructure: Developing data resources and research capabilities.
- Accessibility: Ensuring AI technologies and benefits reach all population segments.
- Social Equity: Addressing digital divides and ensuring fair AI outcomes.
- Investment Ecosystem: Creating enabling conditions for AI investment.
- Dhivehi Language AI: Digitizing content and datasets in the national language.
- Cultural Preservation: Integrating cultural heritage considerations into AI development.
- SIDS Considerations: Addressing unique challenges of small island developing states.
Implementation Framework
Implementation follows a structured approach with clear priorities. Immediate actions include finalizing the AI Masterplan 2025-2035 based on assessment findings. Short-term priorities focus on establishing governance structures and launching education initiatives. Medium-term goals address infrastructure development and Dhivehi language digitization. Long-term objectives target comprehensive AI ecosystem maturation. The NCIT coordinates implementation across government agencies. International partnerships, particularly with UNESCO, provide ongoing technical assistance. Resource mobilization engages both public funding and private investment. Regular progress reviews ensure alignment with strategic objectives and enable adaptive management.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The assessment establishes baseline indicators for tracking AI readiness progress. UNESCO's RAM framework provides standardized metrics for international comparison. Annual reviews will assess advancement against the five strategic focus areas. The UNESCO Global AI Ethics Observatory enables ongoing international benchmarking. Stakeholder feedback mechanisms gather input from government, industry, academia, and civil society. Progress reports will be published to maintain transparency and accountability. The assessment recommends establishing national AI indicators aligned with international standards.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
As an assessment and policy guidance document, the report does not establish direct enforcement mechanisms or penalties. However, it recommends that forthcoming AI legislation include clear liability frameworks for AI-related harms, penalties for violations of ethical AI standards, and accessible appeal mechanisms for affected individuals. The existing ICT Act 2017 and Data Protection Act 2017 provide interim enforcement frameworks for digital and data-related violations. The proposed independent AI governance body will have authority to investigate complaints and enforce compliance once established.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The assessment directly informs the development of the National AI Masterplan 2025-2035. It builds upon the foundation established by the ICT Act 2017 and Data Protection Act 2017. The draft Privacy and Personal Data Protection Bill will strengthen data governance for AI systems. The assessment aligns with UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, providing the ethical framework. Regional initiatives with other South Asian countries enable knowledge sharing and coordination. The assessment recommendations inform future AI-specific legislation development.
International Alignment
The assessment is explicitly grounded in UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, endorsed by 193 member states. The Maldives is the first South Asian country to complete the RAM assessment, demonstrating regional leadership. The assessment addresses OECD AI Principles on transparency, accountability, and human-centered values. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) considerations shape unique aspects of the recommendations. UNESCO provides ongoing support through the Global AI Ethics Observatory. The assessment positions the Maldives for participation in emerging international AI governance frameworks.
Implementation Timeline
| Date | Milestone |
|---|---|
| 2024-09 | UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment initiated |
| 2025-07-31 | Official launch of AI Readiness Assessment Report |
| 2025-Q3 | Assessment findings inform AI Masterplan finalization |
| 2025-2026 | Implementation of immediate recommendations |
| 2026-2028 | Medium-term strategic actions |
Compliance Checklist
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Review Assessment | Study the full RAM report findings and recommendations |
| Stakeholder Engagement | Participate in governance and policy development processes |
| Capacity Building | Engage with AI education and training programs |
| Data Governance | Align data practices with assessment recommendations |
| Monitor Updates | Track implementation of assessment recommendations |
Sources and References
| Source | Type |
|---|---|
| UNESCO AI Ethics Observatory - Maldives | Primary Source |
| UNESCO News - Report Launch | Primary Source |
| Maldives Journal - AI Assessment Launch | News Source |
| National Centre for Information Technology | Government Agency |
The Maldives has become the first South Asian nation to complete UNESCO's AI Readiness Assessment, a comprehensive report launched on July 31, 2025, that provides strategic recommendations for developing ethical and equitable artificial intelligence. This policy document applies broadly across the Maldives, guiding government bodies, private companies, academic institutions, and civil society organizations involved in AI development and deployment.
Developed jointly by UNESCO and the National Centre for Information Technology, the report evaluates the country's preparedness across areas like governance, infrastructure, and talent. It outlines several key recommendations for those involved in AI. Firstly, the Maldives should establish an independent AI governance body and a diverse advisory council to oversee AI policy and regulation. Secondly, there's a strong emphasis on building national AI capabilities through education and training programs, alongside developing robust data resources and research infrastructure, including digitizing content in the Dhivehi language. Finally, the report stresses the importance of ensuring AI technologies are accessible and equitable for all citizens, actively working to bridge digital divides.
While this report itself doesn't carry direct legal obligations or penalties, its findings are immediately informing the National AI Masterplan 2025-2035, with implementation of its recommendations beginning in late 2025. The report explicitly recommends that future AI legislation include clear liability frameworks for AI-related harms, penalties for ethical violations, and accessible appeal mechanisms. Currently, existing laws like the ICT Act 2017 and Data Protection Act 2017 offer some interim enforcement. A practical surprise for many might be that despite its detailed recommendations, this report is a strategic guide, not a law with immediate "teeth." Its effectiveness hinges on the government's commitment to enacting the proposed legislation and establishing the recommended governance bodies.
Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.
What you must do — compliance checklist
0 / 11 marked completePlain-English obligations under Maldives - AI Readiness Assessment. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
- #1ImportantImplementation Framework⏰ 2025-Q3
Applies to: National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT).
“Immediate actions include finalizing the AI Masterplan 2025-2035 based on assessment findings.”
- #2ImportantImplementation Framework⏰ By end of 2026
Applies to: National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT).
“Short-term priorities focus on establishing governance structures and launching education initiatives.”
- #3ImportantImplementation Framework⏰ By end of 2028
Applies to: National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT).
“Medium-term goals address infrastructure development and Dhivehi language digitization.”
- #4ImportantImplementation Framework
Applies to: National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT).
“The NCIT coordinates implementation across government agencies.”
- #5ImportantMonitoring and Evaluation
Applies to: National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT).
“Annual reviews will assess advancement against the five strategic focus areas.”
- #6ImportantMonitoring and Evaluation
Applies to: National Centre for Information Technology (NCIT).
“Progress reports will be published to maintain transparency and accountability.”
- #7RecommendedCompliance Checklist
Applies to: All stakeholders in the Maldives AI ecosystem.
“Study the full RAM report findings and recommendations”
- #8RecommendedCompliance Checklist
Applies to: Relevant government, private sector, academia, and civil society.
“Participate in governance and policy development processes”
- #9RecommendedCompliance Checklist
Applies to: Individuals and organizations developing or using AI.
“Engage with AI education and training programs”
- #10RecommendedCompliance Checklist
Applies to: Organizations handling data for AI systems.
“Align data practices with assessment recommendations”
- #11RecommendedCompliance Checklist
Applies to: All stakeholders in the Maldives AI ecosystem.
“Track implementation of assessment recommendations”
Related Regulations
National AI Masterplan 2025-2035
Maldives94% similar
Maldives AI Regulation Overview
Maldives91% similar
Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
UNESCO90% similar
Communications Authority of Maldives Act (Law No. 42/2015) and related ICT/Telecommunications regulations
Maldives89% similar
Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report of the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence
United Nations89% similar
© Regulations.AI — created on 21-Jul-2026