Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025)
Bill to protect dubbing actors from AI use
Proyecto de decreto que reforma la Ley Federal de Cinematografía, la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor y la Ley Federal del Trabajo para proteger a actores de doblaje frente al uso de IA (Bill to protect dubbing actors from AI use)
Mexico
RAI-MX-NA-PDDQRXX-2025Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025) is Proposed in Mexico as of 9 Sep 2026, according to sidof.segob.gob.mx.
BillGovernance and OversightTransparency and DisclosureEnforcement and PenaltiesA legislative initiative introduced in April 2025 to amend Mexico's Ley Federal de Cinematografía, Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor and Ley Federal del Trabajo to prohibit or tightly regulate the cloning, emulation or substitution of dubbing actors' voices using artificial intelligence without prior written consent and fair compensation. The proposal requires disclosure when AI is used, mandates contractual clauses in employment agreements, sets administrative sanctions (including fines measured in UMAs), and creates funding mechanisms to support the dubbing industry.
Summary
This proposed decree, presented to the Chamber of Deputies on 24 April 2025, seeks to add and amend provisions in three principal federal laws—Ley Federal de Cinematografía (Federal Cinematography Law), Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor (Federal Copyright Law) and Ley Federal del Trabajo (Federal Labor Law)—with the explicit objective of protecting dubbing performers against unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) to reproduce, emulate or replace human voice performances. The initiative, submitted by Deputy Santiago González Soto (PT), addresses a convergence of cultural, labor and intellectual property risks arising from rapid advances in voice synthesis and machine learning technologies.
Key elements of the draft decree include: (1) an obligation for producers to demonstrate compliance with labor, copyright and artist protection laws and to use AI ethically in audiovisual production; (2) a prohibition on exclusively using AI to substitute human dubbing performers without an individual or collective contract that allows such use and provides equivalent compensation; (3) a presumption that valid public release does not occur when a voice performance has been synthetically cloned or emulated by AI absent explicit written authorization from the performer; (4) an explicit requirement that AI-generated or AI-assisted voice performances must be disclosed to the public; (5) creation of an administrative funding mechanism (a compensation fund administered by the Secretaría de Cultura) financed by fees associated to certain commercial uses of AI-generated voices for professional dubbing to support professionalization of the dubbing industry; (6) mandatory contractual clauses in employment and service contracts addressing whether and how AI may be used to emulate a worker's voice, including duration, purpose, and remuneration; and (7) administrative sanctions for employers or producers who use AI to replicate or substitute a worker's voice without authorization, including fines in the range of 1,000 to 5,000 Unidades de Medida y Actualización (UMAs) as proposed in the amendment to Article 994 of the Federal Labor Law.
The initiative draws on labor rights, moral and patrimonial copyright principles, cultural policy concerns (protecting national linguistic identity and the integrity of national dubbing practices) and emerging privacy/biometric considerations for voice as personal data. It also contemplates procedural mechanisms for enforcement through labor inspections, copyright procedures and administrative sanctions and contemplates an immediate entry-into-force clause upon publication in the Diario Oficial de la Federación. If enacted, the bill would require audiovisual producers, dubbing studios, streaming platforms and employers who use voice technologies in Mexico to adopt new contractual, disclosure and remuneration practices; register or report uses in certain contexts; and to be subject to labor and copyright enforcement actions for unauthorized replication of performers' voices.
Full article
Read full text ↗Overview
The Proyecto de Decreto, introduced on 24 April 2025, proposes targeted amendments to the Ley Federal de Cinematografía, the Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor and the Ley Federal del Trabajo to respond to the rapid deployment of voice-synthesis and generative audio AI technologies. The measure's central objective is to protect the labor, cultural and intellectual property rights of dubbing performers by (a) requiring informed written consent and fair compensation for AI-based replication of voices; (b) prohibiting exclusive substitution of human performers with AI without contractual authorization; and (c) requiring public disclosure when AI is used in a dubbing performance. The text of the initiative is publicly accessible in the Chamber of Deputies' official Gaceta Parlamentaria. For the official initiative text see Gaceta Parlamentaria, 24 April 2025.
Definitions
The proposed changes introduce and clarify defined terms for legal and operational certainty. Relevant definitions include: "AI-generated voice" (any voice audio obtained primarily by algorithmic synthesis rather than live human performance); "cloning, emulation or simulation" (the creation of a sound recording intending to reproduce the timbre, prosody or identifiable performance characteristics of an existing human performer); "consent" (prior, informed and written authorization by the rights holder); "compensation" (monetary remuneration proportionate to the commercial use; may include contributions to a designated cultural fund); "public disclosure" (clear labelling or credits when AI is used for a performance); and "dubbing production" (audiovisual projects employing voice-over artists for localization or performance). These definitions align intellectual property, labor and cultural policy objectives and are intended to reduce ambiguity in enforcement and contract drafting.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The initiative creates a multi-agency governance approach. Primary administrative responsibilities fall to the Secretaría de Cultura (for sectoral cultural policy and administration of the proposed compensation fund), the Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor (INDAUTOR) (for registration, advisory and enforcement in copyright matters), and the Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (STPS) (for labor inspection, contract compliance, and sanctions). The bill mandates coordination between these agencies and the Chamber of Deputies' oversight committees to issue guidance, publish model contractual clauses and provide capacity-building to studios and unions. The Gaceta entry contains the formal initiative; see the official publication at Gaceta Parlamentaria. Coordination mechanisms are designed to balance cultural promotion with labor protection while providing a central administrative route to receive complaints and to adjudicate administrative infractions.
Key Focus Areas
The draft focuses on four substantive areas. First, Intellectual Property: the Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor is amended to specify that AI-based cloning of a dubbing performer's fixed performance constitutes a protected interest requiring prior written authorization; unauthorized cloning is not a valid disclosure and cannot be presented as the performer's authorized work. Second, Labor Protections: the Ley Federal del Trabajo would require explicit clauses in employment or service contracts regarding AI use, consent and remuneration, with unauthorized use treated as a violation of labor rights subject to sanction. Third, Cultural Policy and Cinematography: the Ley Federal de Cinematografía will prioritize in-country dubbing with living Mexican professionals and prohibit exclusive AI substitution without written authorization, aiming to preserve linguistic identity and jobs in the national dubbing industry. Fourth, Transparency and Disclosure: any public use of AI in voice performance must be communicated to the public to prevent consumer deception and preserve artistic integrity.
Implementation Framework
Implementation is envisioned through a combination of regulatory guidance, model contractual clauses and enforcement pathways. The Secretaría de Cultura is tasked with creating a fund financed by mandated contributions from commercial uses of AI-generated voices; the INDAUTOR will provide advisory services and maintain registries or guidance on licensing of AI-voices; the STPS will integrate AI-use clauses into labor inspection checklists and impose fines where violations occur. The bill proposes appropriate updating of inspection protocols and an outreach program for small and medium dubbing studios to facilitate compliance. Producers must be able to demonstrate compliance as part of production licensing and may be required to declare whether synthetic voices were used for a given title.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring will combine sectoral reporting, labor inspections and public complaints procedures. The draft requires periodic reports from the Secretaría de Cultura and INDAUTOR to the relevant Congressional committees on enforcement activity, fund disbursement and the impact on employment in the dubbing sector. Key performance indicators include number of unauthorized uses detected, number of contracts updated with AI clauses, funds collected and distributed, and qualitative assessments of the impact on employment and cultural outputs. Third-party audits and evaluations may be commissioned to ensure transparency and that the measure does not unintentionally hinder access to legitimate creative uses of synthetic voices with consent.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
The draft introduces administrative fines and labor sanctions for unauthorized use of AI to replicate or substitute workers' voices. The bill proposes fines ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 UMAs for employers who use AI to replicate or substitute the voice of workers without authorization (per the amendment to Article 994 proposed in the initiative). Liability includes obligations to pay proportional remuneration, potential civil damages under copyright law, and corrective measures such as takedown or rectification of credits. The initiative preserves existing judicial and administrative appeal routes; affected performers may seek labor remedies through STPS procedures and moral/patrimonial redress through INDAUTOR processes and civil courts where applicable.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The proposed amendments interact with existing national instruments including the Ley Federal de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de los Particulares (for voice as potentially sensitive biometric data), telecommunications and copyright statutes, international treaties on copyright (e.g., Berne Convention obligations), and possible forthcoming national AI policy. The draft recognizes that rights and obligations under international agreements remain applicable and that contractual freedom may allow different terms if explicitly agreed by parties, provided they do not contravene minimum protections established by the decree.
International Alignment
The initiative is consistent with global trends to protect performers' rights and respond to AI risks while preserving lawful innovation. Comparable regulatory efforts in other jurisdictions (for instance EU AI Act debates, recent proposals to protect artists in Spain, and voluntary industry codes) inform the draft's approach to consent, disclosure and proportionate remuneration. The bill stresses alignment with Mexico's international copyright obligations and indicates that exceptions may be required by binding international treaties. The drafters indicate awareness of international best practices while asserting the necessity of Mexico-specific protections for cultural and labor policy reasons. See INDAUTOR guidance and related cultural policy information at INDAUTOR Comunicados and relevant cultural policy pages at Secretaría de Cultura.
Implementation Timeline
| Stage | Description | Indicative Date |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Initiative submitted to Chamber of Deputies and published in Gaceta Parlamentaria | 2025-04-24 |
| Committee Review | Opinion, hearings with stakeholders (performers, studios, unions, platforms) | To be scheduled after introduction |
| Legislative Vote | Plenary votes in Chamber(s) of Congress | TBD |
| Publication | Entry into force upon publication in Diario Oficial de la Federación | Day after publication in DOF (TBD) |
Sources and References
| Source | Type |
|---|---|
| Gaceta Parlamentaria: Iniciativa que reforma Leyes en materia de protección para actores de doblaje frente al uso de IA (24 Apr 2025) | Primary Source |
| INDAUTOR - Comunicados y Acuerdos (context on copyright and AI-related communications) | Primary Source / Agency |
| Secretaría de Cultura (sectoral responsibilities and cultural policy) | Primary Source / Agency |
| Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (labor inspection and sanctions) | Primary Source / Agency |
Requirements for a company
What an organisation has to do under Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.
Not yet in force (Proposed). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.
Must do
7- Obtain prior, informed, and written consent for any AI replication of voices.Entities using AI to replicate dubbing actors' voices.
- Include explicit AI use, consent, and remuneration provisions in employment or service contracts.Employers of dubbing performers.
- Do not exclusively substitute human dubbing performers with AI without prior written authorization.Entities producing dubbing productions.
- Make mandated contributions to the cultural fund for commercial uses of AI-generated voices.Entities commercially using AI-generated voices.
- Provide clear public disclosure or credits when AI is used for a dubbing performance.Entities producing dubbing performances using AI.
- Maintain records demonstrating lawful authorization and proportional remuneration for AI voice use.Producers of dubbing productions using AI.
- +1 more in the table below
Must not do
0Nothing in this category.
Should do
0Nothing in this category.
Should not do
0Nothing in this category.
Who must do what
The obligations under Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
| # | Who | Requirement | By when | Where | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Entities using AI to replicate dubbing actors' voices. | Obtain prior, informed, and written consent for any AI replication of voices. “requiring informed written consent and fair compensation for AI-based replication of voices” | Before using AI to replicate voices | — | Critical |
| 2 | Employers of dubbing performers. | Include explicit AI use, consent, and remuneration provisions in employment or service contracts. “require explicit clauses in employment or service contracts regarding AI use, consent and remuneration” | Before engaging dubbing performers | — | Critical |
| 3 | Entities producing dubbing productions. | Do not exclusively substitute human dubbing performers with AI without prior written authorization. “prohibit exclusive AI substitution without written authorization” | Before substituting human performers with AI | — | Critical |
| 4 | Entities commercially using AI-generated voices. | Make mandated contributions to the cultural fund for commercial uses of AI-generated voices. “mandated contributions from commercial uses of AI-generated voices” | As required by the Secretaría de Cultura | — | Critical |
| 5 | Entities producing dubbing performances using AI. | Provide clear public disclosure or credits when AI is used for a dubbing performance. “requiring public disclosure when AI is used in a dubbing performance” | Before public release of the performance | — | Important |
| 6 | Producers of dubbing productions using AI. | Maintain records demonstrating lawful authorization and proportional remuneration for AI voice use. “Producers must be able to demonstrate compliance as part of production licensing” | Continuously, for production licensing | — | Important |
| 7 | Employers of dubbing performers. | Cooperate with labor inspections and provide information regarding AI-use clauses in contracts. “STPS will integrate AI-use clauses into labor inspection checklists” | Upon request during inspection | — | Important |
Related Regulations
Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025)
Mexico91% similar
Mexico - Federal AI Legislative Initiatives
Mexico90% similar
Mexico - Regulation of Emerging Technologies (2025)
Mexico89% similar
Mexico AI Regulation Overview
Mexico89% similar
Mexico - Criminalizing Non-consensual AI Content (2025)
Mexico89% similar
More AI regulation in Mexico
AI regulation in Mexico: full overview
- Mexico - Digital Governance Framework (2023)
- Mexico - AI Development Guidelines (2018)
- Mexico - Ethical AI and Robotics Regulation (RAI-MX-NA-PLPLRXX-2023)
- Mexico - National Digital Strategy (2021-2024)
- Mexico - AI Research Consortium
- Mexico - Interministerial ICT Commission (2023)
- Mexico - AI Strategy Development
- Mexico - AI Legislation Empowerment (2025)
© Regulations.AI · updated on 20 Sep 2026 · reviewed against official sources on 9 Sep 2026