Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025)
Bill to protect dubbing actors from AI use
Proyecto de decreto que reforma la Ley Federal de Cinematografía, la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor y la Ley Federal del Trabajo para proteger a actores de doblaje frente al uso de IA
Mexico
RAI-MX-NA-PDDQRXX-2025A legislative initiative introduced in April 2025 to amend Mexico's Ley Federal de Cinematografía, Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor and Ley Federal del Trabajo to prohibit or tightly regulate the cloning, emulation or substitution of dubbing actors' voices using artificial intelligence without prior written consent and fair compensation. The proposal requires disclosure when AI is used, mandates contractual clauses in employment agreements, sets administrative sanctions (including fines measured in UMAs), and creates funding mechanisms to support the dubbing industry.
Summary
Read full text ↗Plain English
Overview
The Proyecto de Decreto, introduced on 24 April 2025, proposes targeted amendments to the Ley Federal de Cinematografía, the Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor and the Ley Federal del Trabajo to respond to the rapid deployment of voice-synthesis and generative audio AI technologies. The measure's central objective is to protect the labor, cultural and intellectual property rights of dubbing performers by (a) requiring informed written consent and fair compensation for AI-based replication of voices; (b) prohibiting exclusive substitution of human performers with AI without contractual authorization; and (c) requiring public disclosure when AI is used in a dubbing performance. The text of the initiative is publicly accessible in the Chamber of Deputies' official Gaceta Parlamentaria. For the official initiative text see Gaceta Parlamentaria, 24 April 2025.
Definitions
The proposed changes introduce and clarify defined terms for legal and operational certainty. Relevant definitions include: "AI-generated voice" (any voice audio obtained primarily by algorithmic synthesis rather than live human performance); "cloning, emulation or simulation" (the creation of a sound recording intending to reproduce the timbre, prosody or identifiable performance characteristics of an existing human performer); "consent" (prior, informed and written authorization by the rights holder); "compensation" (monetary remuneration proportionate to the commercial use; may include contributions to a designated cultural fund); "public disclosure" (clear labelling or credits when AI is used for a performance); and "dubbing production" (audiovisual projects employing voice-over artists for localization or performance). These definitions align intellectual property, labor and cultural policy objectives and are intended to reduce ambiguity in enforcement and contract drafting.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The initiative creates a multi-agency governance approach. Primary administrative responsibilities fall to the Secretaría de Cultura (for sectoral cultural policy and administration of the proposed compensation fund), the Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor (INDAUTOR) (for registration, advisory and enforcement in copyright matters), and the Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (STPS) (for labor inspection, contract compliance, and sanctions). The bill mandates coordination between these agencies and the Chamber of Deputies' oversight committees to issue guidance, publish model contractual clauses and provide capacity-building to studios and unions. The Gaceta entry contains the formal initiative; see the official publication at Gaceta Parlamentaria. Coordination mechanisms are designed to balance cultural promotion with labor protection while providing a central administrative route to receive complaints and to adjudicate administrative infractions.
Key Focus Areas
The draft focuses on four substantive areas. First, Intellectual Property: the Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor is amended to specify that AI-based cloning of a dubbing performer's fixed performance constitutes a protected interest requiring prior written authorization; unauthorized cloning is not a valid disclosure and cannot be presented as the performer's authorized work. Second, Labor Protections: the Ley Federal del Trabajo would require explicit clauses in employment or service contracts regarding AI use, consent and remuneration, with unauthorized use treated as a violation of labor rights subject to sanction. Third, Cultural Policy and Cinematography: the Ley Federal de Cinematografía will prioritize in-country dubbing with living Mexican professionals and prohibit exclusive AI substitution without written authorization, aiming to preserve linguistic identity and jobs in the national dubbing industry. Fourth, Transparency and Disclosure: any public use of AI in voice performance must be communicated to the public to prevent consumer deception and preserve artistic integrity.
Implementation Framework
Implementation is envisioned through a combination of regulatory guidance, model contractual clauses and enforcement pathways. The Secretaría de Cultura is tasked with creating a fund financed by mandated contributions from commercial uses of AI-generated voices; the INDAUTOR will provide advisory services and maintain registries or guidance on licensing of AI-voices; the STPS will integrate AI-use clauses into labor inspection checklists and impose fines where violations occur. The bill proposes appropriate updating of inspection protocols and an outreach program for small and medium dubbing studios to facilitate compliance. Producers must be able to demonstrate compliance as part of production licensing and may be required to declare whether synthetic voices were used for a given title.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring will combine sectoral reporting, labor inspections and public complaints procedures. The draft requires periodic reports from the Secretaría de Cultura and INDAUTOR to the relevant Congressional committees on enforcement activity, fund disbursement and the impact on employment in the dubbing sector. Key performance indicators include number of unauthorized uses detected, number of contracts updated with AI clauses, funds collected and distributed, and qualitative assessments of the impact on employment and cultural outputs. Third-party audits and evaluations may be commissioned to ensure transparency and that the measure does not unintentionally hinder access to legitimate creative uses of synthetic voices with consent.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
The draft introduces administrative fines and labor sanctions for unauthorized use of AI to replicate or substitute workers' voices. The bill proposes fines ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 UMAs for employers who use AI to replicate or substitute the voice of workers without authorization (per the amendment to Article 994 proposed in the initiative). Liability includes obligations to pay proportional remuneration, potential civil damages under copyright law, and corrective measures such as takedown or rectification of credits. The initiative preserves existing judicial and administrative appeal routes; affected performers may seek labor remedies through STPS procedures and moral/patrimonial redress through INDAUTOR processes and civil courts where applicable.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The proposed amendments interact with existing national instruments including the Ley Federal de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de los Particulares (for voice as potentially sensitive biometric data), telecommunications and copyright statutes, international treaties on copyright (e.g., Berne Convention obligations), and possible forthcoming national AI policy. The draft recognizes that rights and obligations under international agreements remain applicable and that contractual freedom may allow different terms if explicitly agreed by parties, provided they do not contravene minimum protections established by the decree.
International Alignment
The initiative is consistent with global trends to protect performers' rights and respond to AI risks while preserving lawful innovation. Comparable regulatory efforts in other jurisdictions (for instance EU AI Act debates, recent proposals to protect artists in Spain, and voluntary industry codes) inform the draft's approach to consent, disclosure and proportionate remuneration. The bill stresses alignment with Mexico's international copyright obligations and indicates that exceptions may be required by binding international treaties. The drafters indicate awareness of international best practices while asserting the necessity of Mexico-specific protections for cultural and labor policy reasons. See INDAUTOR guidance and related cultural policy information at INDAUTOR Comunicados and relevant cultural policy pages at Secretaría de Cultura.
Implementation Timeline
| Stage | Description | Indicative Date |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Initiative submitted to Chamber of Deputies and published in Gaceta Parlamentaria | 2025-04-24 |
| Committee Review | Opinion, hearings with stakeholders (performers, studios, unions, platforms) | To be scheduled after introduction |
| Legislative Vote | Plenary votes in Chamber(s) of Congress | TBD |
| Publication | Entry into force upon publication in Diario Oficial de la Federación | Day after publication in DOF (TBD) |
Compliance Checklist
| Obligation | Action Required |
|---|---|
| Contract clauses | Include explicit AI-use and remuneration provisions in employment and service contracts |
| Consent documentation | Obtain prior, written, informed consent for any AI replication of voices |
| Public disclosure | Label and credit AI-assisted or AI-generated voice performances in public releases |
| Demonstrate compliance | Maintain records demonstrating lawful authorization and payments for AI voice use |
| Reporting | Respond to sectoral reporting and inspections by Secretaría de Cultura/STPS/INDAUTOR |
Sources and References
| Source | Type |
|---|---|
| Gaceta Parlamentaria: Iniciativa que reforma Leyes en materia de protección para actores de doblaje frente al uso de IA (24 Apr 2025) | Primary Source |
| INDAUTOR - Comunicados y Acuerdos (context on copyright and AI-related communications) | Primary Source / Agency |
| Secretaría de Cultura (sectoral responsibilities and cultural policy) | Primary Source / Agency |
| Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (labor inspection and sanctions) | Primary Source / Agency |
A proposed Mexican law aims to protect dubbing actors by tightly regulating the use of artificial intelligence to clone, emulate, or substitute their voices without explicit consent and fair pay.
This bill, introduced in April 2025, targets anyone involved in dubbing productions – including studios, producers, and employers – who utilize AI to replicate or replace the voices of human performers. It specifically addresses AI-generated voices that replicate a performer's unique vocal characteristics.
Key requirements include: - You must obtain prior, informed, and written consent from a dubbing actor before using AI to clone, emulate, or substitute their voice. - Fair compensation, proportionate to the commercial use, is also mandatory. - Employment and service contracts must include explicit clauses detailing AI use, consent, and remuneration. - When AI is used in a dubbing performance, clear public disclosure through labelling or credits is required. - The law also aims to prevent the exclusive replacement of human actors with AI without specific contractual authorization, prioritizing human talent and cultural preservation.
While currently a proposed bill, it was introduced in April 2025 and is expected to take effect the day after its official publication in Mexico's Diario Oficial de la Federación, once it passes through the legislative process.
Non-compliance carries significant penalties. Employers found using AI to replicate or substitute voices without authorization could face administrative fines ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 UMAs (a standard unit for fines in Mexico). Beyond fines, liability may include paying proportional remuneration, potential civil damages under copyright law, and corrective actions like removing unauthorized content. Enforcement involves Mexico's Ministry of Culture, the National Institute of Copyright (INDAUTOR), and the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare.
A practical surprise for those in the industry is the creation of a new fund, managed by the Ministry of Culture, which will be financed by mandatory contributions from commercial uses of AI-generated voices. Beyond direct compensation, companies using AI for dubbing may also face an additional levy to support the industry.
Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.
What you must do — compliance checklist
0 / 7 marked completePlain-English obligations under Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025). Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
- #1Critical⏰ Before using AI to replicate voices
Applies to: Entities using AI to replicate dubbing actors' voices.
“requiring informed written consent and fair compensation for AI-based replication of voices”
- #2Critical⏰ Before engaging dubbing performers
Applies to: Employers of dubbing performers.
“require explicit clauses in employment or service contracts regarding AI use, consent and remuneration”
- #3Critical⏰ Before substituting human performers with AI
Applies to: Entities producing dubbing productions.
“prohibit exclusive AI substitution without written authorization”
- #4Critical⏰ As required by the Secretaría de Cultura
Applies to: Entities commercially using AI-generated voices.
“mandated contributions from commercial uses of AI-generated voices”
- #5Important⏰ Before public release of the performance
Applies to: Entities producing dubbing performances using AI.
“requiring public disclosure when AI is used in a dubbing performance”
- #6Important⏰ Continuously, for production licensing
Applies to: Producers of dubbing productions using AI.
“Producers must be able to demonstrate compliance as part of production licensing”
- #7Important⏰ Upon request during inspection
Applies to: Employers of dubbing performers.
“STPS will integrate AI-use clauses into labor inspection checklists”
Related Regulations
Iniciativa que reforma diversas disposiciones del Código Penal Federal y de la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor en materia de IA generativa (Bill amending Criminal Code and Copyright law re: generative AI)
Mexico91% similar
Federal Artificial Intelligence legislative initiatives and Senate commission proposal (2023–2025)
Mexico90% similar
Proyecto de decreto que regula tecnologías emergentes, disruptivas e inteligencia artificial (Bill to regulate emerging/disruptive technologies and AI)
Mexico89% similar
Iniciativa que adiciona el artículo 199 Octies al Código Penal Federal para sancionar la creación de contenido íntimo sexual con IA sin consentimiento (Bill adding criminal sanction for AI‑generated intimate content without consent)
Mexico89% similar
Iniciativa que adiciona disposiciones para el uso de Inteligencia Artificial por unidades de seguridad pública (Bill authorizing/setting rules for AI use in public security investigations)
Mexico89% similar
© Regulations.AI — created on 13-Jun-2026