Russia - AI Ethics Guidelines (2021)

Code of Ethics in the Field of Artificial Intelligence

Кодекс этики в области искусственного интеллекта

Russia

RAI-RU-NA-CEFAIXX-2021
Adopted(Adopted)
GuidelineGovernance and OversightFundamental Rights
Export PDF

Voluntary Code of Ethics establishing ethical principles for responsible AI development and deployment in Russia, adopted October 26, 2021, by AI Alliance in collaboration with government and industry stakeholders, emphasizing human rights protection, transparency, accountability, and trust-building in AI systems through self-regulatory mechanisms.

Summary

The Code of Ethics in the Field of Artificial Intelligence is a voluntary national ethical framework adopted in 2021 to guide developers, users and public bodies in the design, deployment and use of AI systems in Russia. It sets high-level principles (human‑centredness, non‑discrimination, risk‑orientation, precaution and responsibility) and recommends institutional mechanisms for implementation.

Full article

Read full text ↗

Overview

The Code of Ethics in the Field of Artificial Intelligence (the "Code") is a voluntary national ethical framework that was presented and signed at the I International Forum "Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: The Beginning of Trust" in October 2021. It was adopted on 2021-10-26 and is intended to guide developers, providers, users, research organisations and public authorities engaged with AI systems in the Russian Federation. The Code sets high-level ethical principles and recommends institutional mechanisms and operational practices to promote the responsible design, deployment and use of AI systems in civil (non‑military) domains. Primary public information and commentary on the Code and related implementation activities are available via official government portals (for example, the national AI portal: https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai) and official agency announcements (for example, Rospatent notices: https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai). The full text of the Code as published by the AI Alliance is additionally available at https://a-ai.ru/ethics_EN/index.html.

Definitions

The Code adopts working definitions to clarify the scope and applicability of its provisions. It defines key terms such as "systems based on artificial intelligence", "developers", "users" and "stakeholders in the AI lifecycle", and uses these definitions to delimit responsibilities, recommended processes and the stages of development, deployment and operation covered by the Code. These working definitions are intended to make clear which actors and which types of AI activity are expected to consider the Code's principles and to assist organisations in determining how to implement the Code’s recommendations in practice. Authoritative descriptions and the Code text are discussed on official portals (see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai).

Governance and Institutional Framework

The Code envisages governance and institutional mechanisms to support its voluntary implementation across sectors. It recommends the establishment of coordinating bodies (for example, a national commission or coordinating body on AI ethics), the appointment of ethics officers or ombudsmen within organisations, the possibility of sectoral ethics committees and the creation of collective registries or registers of trustworthy developers. Following adoption, a national commission for implementation was established at the national level to coordinate rollout and related activities. The Code anticipates cooperation among public authorities, developers, research organisations and users to operationalise ethical principles and to develop methodological recommendations and best practices; official descriptions of these governance arrangements and the accession of federal agencies are reflected on government portals (see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai and https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai).

Key Focus Areas

  • Human‑centredness and protection of human dignity and autonomy: the Code emphasises respect for human rights and human autonomy in the design and deployment of AI.
  • Non‑discrimination and fairness: the Code requires attention to risks of bias and discrimination and recommends measures to prevent unfair outcomes.
  • Risk orientation and precaution: the Code promotes risk‑based assessment and the application of the precautionary principle where harms are plausible but uncertain.
  • Responsibility and accountability: actors are encouraged to take responsibility for foreseeable impacts of AI systems and to adopt internal accountability mechanisms.
  • Transparency and informed interaction: the Code recommends transparency toward affected persons, including identifying instances where people interact with AI systems.
  • Data protection and security: obligations include ensuring lawful processing of personal data and appropriate data‑security measures.
  • Operational measures and governance: the Code advises appointment of ethics officers/ombudsmen, creation of sectoral committees, maintenance of internal ethical charters and adoption of procedures for risk and humanitarian‑impact assessments.
  • Trust‑building and voluntary adherence: the Code functions as a soft‑law instrument intended to build public trust through voluntary commitments, public signing and peer oversight rather than statutory compulsion.

Implementation Framework

Implementation of the Code is based on voluntary organisational commitment. Signatory organisations publicly declare adherence by signing and committing to follow the Code’s provisions; implementation relies on internal policies such as ethical charters, documented procedures for risk assessment and mitigation, and methodological recommendations produced by coordinating bodies. Recommended institutional steps include the appointment of ethics officers or ombudsmen within organisations, establishment of sectoral ethics committees where appropriate, development of internal processes for identification and labelling of AI interactions with people, and maintenance of registers or directories of trustworthy developers. The Code also encourages the development and periodic update of best‑practice guidance and methodological materials to support consistent internal implementation across sectors. Government portals and agency notices summarise these implementation expectations and report on events and signings (see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai and https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai). The full text published by stakeholders is available at https://a-ai.ru/ethics_EN/index.html.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Because the Code is a voluntary instrument, monitoring and evaluation are primarily based on non‑statutory mechanisms: public disclosure of commitments, peer review, sectoral signings and reputation‑based incentives. The Code recommends regular internal reviews of organisational practices, updates to procedures and adoption of lessons learned. National coordination arrangements, including the commission established to oversee implementation, facilitate monitoring through reporting of signatories, publication of sector‑specific guidance and the development of methodological recommendations for risk and humanitarian‑impact assessments. Official portals track accession by public bodies and the publication of related materials (see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai and https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai).

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

The Code does not create statutory sanctions, administrative penalties or a formal appeals mechanism. Enforcement is reputational and cooperative: adherence is supported through voluntary commitment, public declarations by signatories, peer mechanisms and sectoral oversight. The Code is designed to inform future regulatory and standardisation work rather than to establish new penal regimes; any questions of legal liability arising from AI use remain subject to applicable statutory law and sectoral regulation rather than to the Code itself. Official commentary and agency communications reiterate the voluntary, soft‑law nature of the instrument (see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai and https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai).

Relationship to Other Instruments

The Code is positioned as complementary to Russia’s National AI Strategy and to sectoral regulation. It is intended to inform standardisation, sectoral policies and possible future statutory instruments. Authorities and stakeholders have discussed ways to incorporate ethical provisions into legislation and sectoral rules while preserving the Code’s voluntary, trust‑building character. The Code serves as a reference point for regulators, standards bodies and industry stakeholders seeking to align sectoral standards and voluntary conformity schemes with ethical principles endorsed at the national level. Official portal materials describe the Code’s role in the broader regulatory and policy landscape (see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai).

International Alignment

The primary focus of the Code is national: it establishes a Russian voluntary ethical framework for AI and serves as a basis for national implementation and sectoral guidance. The published materials and official descriptions emphasise its national, voluntary character and do not present it as a binding instrument of international law. The Code may nonetheless be used as reference material in discussions with international standardisation bodies and multilateral fora, but such international engagements and alignments are not specified as formal obligations within the Code itself. For official summaries and announcements concerning the Code’s adoption and national implementation, see https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai and related agency communications at https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai.

Implementation Timeline

DateEvent
2021-10-26Code Adopted — The Code of Ethics in the Field of Artificial Intelligence was presented and signed at the I International Forum "Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: The Beginning of Trust" and formally adopted on 26 October 2021.
2022-05-01Ethics Commission Established — A national mechanism (a commission or coordinating body) for coordinating ethical implementation at the national level was established to support rollout and related activities.

Sources and References

SourceURL
National AI Portal (official government portal)https://ai.gov.ru/ai/regulatory/?utm_source=openai
Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) — official announcementhttps://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/rospatent-prisoedinilsya-k-kodeksu-etiki-v-sfere-is-22122022?utm_source=openai

Requirements for a company

What an organisation has to do under Russia - AI Ethics Guidelines (2021), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.

Not yet in force (Adopted). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.

Must do

6
  • Publicly declare adherence to the Code by signing it.Organizations engaging with AI systems in Russia
  • Designate an internal point of responsibility for ethical compliance.Organizations engaging with AI systems in Russia
  • Establish and apply documented procedures for assessing AI system risks and impacts.Organizations developing or deploying AI systems in Russia
  • Ensure clear identification and labelling of AI interactions with people.Organizations deploying AI systems in Russia
  • Implement measures for lawful personal data processing and data security.Organizations engaging with AI systems in Russia
  • Adopt an internal ethical charter and regularly review its implementation.Organizations engaging with AI systems in Russia

Must not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Who must do what

The obligations under Russia - AI Ethics Guidelines (2021), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

#WhoRequirementBy whenWhereSeverity
1Organizations engaging with AI systems in RussiaPublicly declare adherence to the Code by signing it.
Sign and publicly declare adherence to the Code to demonstrate organisational commitment and enable peer oversight.
Compliance ChecklistImportant
2Organizations engaging with AI systems in RussiaDesignate an internal point of responsibility for ethical compliance.
Designate an internal point of responsibility for ethical compliance, coordination of assessments and liaison with sectoral or national coordinating bodies.
Compliance ChecklistImportant
3Organizations developing or deploying AI systems in RussiaEstablish and apply documented procedures for assessing AI system risks and impacts.
Establish documented procedures for assessing risks and potential humanitarian impacts of AI systems and apply these assessments during development and prior to deployment.
During development and prior to deploymentCompliance ChecklistImportant
4Organizations deploying AI systems in RussiaEnsure clear identification and labelling of AI interactions with people.
Ensure clear identification of AI interactions with people (labelling or disclosure where appropriate) and maintain transparency toward affected persons.
Compliance ChecklistImportant
5Organizations engaging with AI systems in RussiaImplement measures for lawful personal data processing and data security.
Implement measures to ensure lawful processing of personal data and to maintain data security consistent with applicable law and the Code’s recommendations.
Compliance ChecklistImportant
6Organizations engaging with AI systems in RussiaAdopt an internal ethical charter and regularly review its implementation.
Adopt an internal ethical charter or code of practice, update organisational policies regularly, and review implementation in line with methodological recommendations.
Compliance ChecklistImportant

© Regulations.AI · updated on 06-Jan-2026