Spanish Data Protection Authority (AEPD) — Mercadona, S.A.
The AEPD fined Mercadona for the unlawful use of a facial recognition system in its supermarkets to detect individuals with criminal convictions or restraining orders, processing biometric data of customers and employees without a valid legal basis.
Key takeaway — how to prevent this
Biometric data (faces, iris, fingerprints) needs an explicit lawful basis or consent. Scraping or capturing it without one is unlawful across the EU/UK and many US states (e.g. Illinois BIPA) — and draws the largest fines.
Case brief
Read from the decision on 2026-09-19. Every holding carries a short verbatim quote from that text (in ES, the document's language).
- Decided by
- Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
- Parties
- Agencia Española de Protección de Datos v. Mercadona, S.A.
- Decision date
- July 19, 2021
- Remedy
- Mercadona paid a fine of €2,520,000 after a voluntary payment discount and was prohibited from processing personal data using facial recognition in its establishments.
- Amount
- €2,520,000
- Appeal
- Appeal status not stated
Key holdings
The AEPD found that Mercadona's store facial recognition system processed special categories of personal biometric data under European and Spanish data protection law.
“constituye un tratamiento de datos de categoría especial de los regulados en el art. 9 del RGPD y art 9 de la LOPDGDD.” — HECHOS PROBADOS, PRIMERO
The AEPD concluded that Mercadona lacked a lawful basis under Article 6 GDPR and an applicable exception under Article 9 GDPR to process biometric data of store entrants.
“no consta base legítima conforme señala el art. 6 del RGPD, ni normativa legal que lo permita según dispone el art. 8 de la LOPDGDD.” — HECHOS PROBADOS, TERCERO
The AEPD formally terminated the sanctioning proceedings following Mercadona's voluntary payment of the reduced fine of €2,520,000.
“En fecha 19 de julio de 2021, la parte reclamada ha procedido al pago de la sanción en la cuantía de 2.520.000 € haciendo uso de la reducción prevista” — ANTECEDENTES, SEGUNDO
The AEPD ordered a complete ban on personal data processing involving facial recognition across Mercadona's establishments.
“Prohibir todo el tratamiento de datos personales relativo al reconocimiento facial en sus establecimientos, de acuerdo con el artículo 58.2.f).” — RESUELVE, PRIMERO
In plain English
In July 2020, the Spanish Data Protection Authority (AEPD) initiated an investigation into supermarket chain Mercadona, S.A. after media reports indicated that the company was implementing a facial recognition system across its stores. Mercadona deployed the system in 40 stores starting in July 2020 to detect individuals subject to court-ordered restraining orders protecting Mercadona or its workers. The system scanned faces of everyone entering the stores, converted them into biometric templates within 0.3 seconds, and matched them against a database of convicted individuals. In May 2021, the AEPD initiated formal sanctioning proceedings. The authority found that facial recognition processes special categories of biometric data under Article 9 of the GDPR. The AEPD determined that Mercadona lacked a valid exception under Article 9 to process biometric data of all store visitors and had no legal basis under Article 6 of the GDPR. Furthermore, Mercadona failed to provide adequate information to customers and employees, failed to conduct a proper impact assessment covering all affected groups, and violated data minimization and privacy by design requirements. The AEPD proposed administrative fines for multiple GDPR violations and ordered the suspension of the system. Mercadona voluntarily paid a reduced fine of 2,520,000 euros on July 19, 2021, exercising a 20 percent statutory reduction, which entailed waiving administrative appeals. Consequently, the AEPD formally terminated the proceedings and permanently prohibited Mercadona from processing personal data through facial recognition in its establishments.
Inclusion does not imply wrongdoing or liability. Status reflects the latest information we have — always check the official source for current status.