Indonesia - National AI Strategy

National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2020–2045

Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia (National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence) 2020–2045

Indonesia

RAI-ID-NA-SNKAIXX-2020
Adopted(Adopted)
PolicyGovernance and OversightAccountability and Documentation
Export PDF

The Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial (Stranas KA) 2020–2045 is Indonesia’s national AI strategy published in 2020 by BPPT/BRIN. It sets strategic priorities, governance recommendations, sectoral focus areas (health, public service reform, education & research, food security, mobility & smart cities), and an implementation roadmap to support Indonesia’s long-term digital transformation and Indonesia 2045 goals.

Summary

The Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia 2020–2045 (Stranas KA) is a long-range strategic policy document prepared under the coordination of the Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT) in 2020 (now part of BRIN). The document outlines a national vision to harness artificial intelligence (AI) for national development up to the year 2045 and identifies priority sectors, governance arrangements, capability-building targets, infrastructure and data ecosystem requirements, research and innovation priorities, and ethical considerations. Stranas KA articulates five priority sector clusters—healthcare, reform of public administration (bureaucratic reform), education and research, food security (including agriculture and maritime), and mobility & smart cities—and sets cross-cutting priorities such as talent development, data availability and standards, computational and cloud infrastructure, research & industry collaboration, and AI ethics and safety. The strategy recommends establishing governance mechanisms to coordinate across ministries, regional governments, industry, academia and civil society (quadruple helix), including the creation or designation of a coordinating entity to drive implementation and orchestration. It calls for regulatory sandboxes, standards and certification frameworks, investment in human capital and curricula, improved public sector digital services, and signals the need to align with international AI governance frameworks and data protection regimes. Although a strategic (soft-law) instrument rather than a binding statute, Stranas KA has been adopted as the reference for national programs and has informed subsequent ministerial activities, pilot projects and broader regulatory work (including ethics guidance and data protection initiatives). The strategy emphasizes risk management, transparency, accountability and protecting fundamental rights, while recommending cybersecurity and privacy safeguards. Implementation relies on coordinated action plans, pilot projects, public–private partnerships and monitoring frameworks. The document anticipated future legal and regulatory instruments (including potential Presidential Regulation or sectoral rules) to operationalize specific obligations, liability rules and enforcement mechanisms.

Full article

Read full text ↗

Overview

The Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia 2020–2045 (Stranas KA) is a national policy roadmap prepared by the Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT) in 2020 and introduced publicly during Hari Kebangkitan Teknologi Nasional (Hakteknas) in August 2020. The strategy positions AI as a cross‑cutting enabler for Indonesia’s development toward the Indonesia 2045 vision and defines five priority sector clusters (health, bureaucratic reform, education & research, food security, mobility & smart cities). It sets strategic objectives across governance, human resources, infrastructure and data ecosystems, research & innovation, and ethical & safety considerations. The original document and downloadable publication have been circulated by the BPPT/BRIN ecosystem and are hosted on public AI coordination portals; a commonly cited copy is available at AI Innovation / Stranas KA (PDF). Stranas KA is intended as a guiding (non‑binding) national strategy to inform ministries, regional governments, academia, industry and communities on priorities and implementation pathways.

Definitions

Stranas KA uses terminology aligned with international AI policy practice and local technical usage. Core definitions include "kecerdasan artifisial / artificial intelligence" (systems or software that perform tasks considered to require intelligence), "ecosystem" (quadruple helix of government, industry, academia and civil society), "regulatory sandbox" (time‑bounded test environment under supervisory arrangements), and "use case" (sectoral application of AI to deliver public or private value). The document distinguishes between research & development activities, deployment for operational public service, and commercial adoption. It frames risk concepts around safety, fairness, privacy, robustness and resilience to cyber threats.

Governance and Institutional Framework

Stranas KA recommends a coordinated, multi‑stakeholder governance architecture to orchestrate national AI efforts. The strategy advocates for a lead coordinating body (taskforce or secretariat) to drive implementation across ministries and regions, with defined roles for research agencies (BPPT/BRIN), central ministries (e.g., Ministry of Communication and Informatics / Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika), planning agencies (Bappenas), sector ministries (e.g., Health, Education, Agriculture, Transportation), and regional governments. It emphasizes the quadruple helix model — government, industry, academia and community — to co‑design use cases, share datasets, and mobilize investment. The strategy notes the need for interoperability and standards, recommends joint funding mechanisms, and suggests creation of working groups on ethics, standards, data governance and talent. It also calls for linkages between national coordination and local implementation units to ensure regional uptake and inclusion.

Key Focus Areas

Stranas KA structures priorities into sector clusters and cross‑cutting enablers. The five highlighted clusters are: (1) Health — accelerating diagnostics, telemedicine, health system optimization and pandemic response; (2) Bureaucratic Reform — automating administrative workflows, improving public services and decision‑support for policy; (3) Education & Research — curriculum development, AI research capacity building and university‑industry collaboration; (4) Food Security — precision agriculture, supply chain optimization, fisheries and maritime monitoring; and (5) Mobility & Smart Cities — traffic optimization, public transport automation, disaster mitigation and urban planning. Cross‑cutting enablers include talent development (education, certifications, competency frameworks), data ecosystems (standards, secure data repositories, synthetic data where needed), computational infrastructure (cloud, HPC), regulatory sandboxes and standards & certification pathways. The strategy stresses ethical considerations — fairness, non‑discrimination, transparency and accountability — and recommends safety testing, validation of AI models, and cybersecurity measures for deployed systems.

Implementation Framework

Implementation in Stranas KA rests on phased actions, pilot projects and scaling mechanisms. The strategy proposes short, medium and long‑term actions: initial pilots (2020–2024) to validate high‑impact use cases; capacity building and standards development (2021–2030); expansion and industrialization (2030–2040); and consolidation toward Indonesia 2045 (2040–2045). Key instruments include public‑private partnerships, dedicated research funding, competency certification, national data and computational infrastructure investments, and regulatory sandboxes for testing high‑impact applications under oversight. The document recommends establishing monitoring dashboards and KPIs and integrating AI plans into ministerial workplans and regional development strategies. It also encourages industry to adopt best practices for transparency and model documentation and proposes support for startups and local vendors to reduce import dependency.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Stranas KA outlines a monitoring & evaluation approach with measurable indicators and periodic reviews. It recommends an implementation secretariat to publish annual progress reports and maintain a public dashboard tracking KPIs such as numbers of trained professionals, deployed pilots across priority sectors, research outputs, dataset availability, and infrastructure capacity (compute & storage). The strategy calls for mid‑term reviews every 3–5 years to revisit priorities and update roadmaps in response to technological change. It also suggests external peer review (including international partners) and stakeholder consultations to ensure transparency and adaptive management.

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

As a strategic (soft‑law) document, Stranas KA does not itself create binding penalties or formal liability rules. Instead, it recommends that implementing agencies and future sectoral regulations define liability, redress and appeals procedures for AI systems — particularly in high‑impact domains like health and public services. The strategy advocates legal clarity on accountability chains (developer, deployer, operator), mechanisms for user redress, and establishing standards for documentation and audit trails to enable investigations. It also proposes that sandboxes and piloting frameworks specify liability allocation while longer‑term statutory or regulatory measures are developed.

Relationship to Other Instruments

Stranas KA is positioned as a cross‑cutting national policy that complements existing laws and digital governance instruments. It explicitly references the need to align with Indonesia’s electronic systems governance (e.g., Presidential Regulation on Electronic-Based Government / SPBE frameworks), sectoral regulations (health, transport, agriculture), and emerging data protection rules such as the Personal Data Protection law. The strategy is intended to inform future regulatory instruments (ministerial rules, presidential regulations) and to be integrated into planning documents (Bappenas medium‑term plans) and agency digital transformation roadmaps.

International Alignment

The strategy recommends aligning Indonesia’s AI governance with international norms and standards and participating in multilateral dialogues. It highlights collaboration with UNESCO on Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM) and notes the importance of OECD, ASEAN and other international guidance on AI ethics, safety and risk management. Stranas KA encourages international research partnerships, adherence to globally accepted best practices for transparency and model documentation, and harmonization of technical standards to facilitate trade and interoperability.

Implementation Timeline

PeriodActions / Milestones
2020–2021Publication & launch at Hakteknas; formation of coordination groups; initial pilots in priority sectors; stakeholder consultations. (Launch publicly announced August 10, 2020.)
2021–2025Talent programs, pilot scaling, development of sandboxes, standards drafting, initial infrastructure investments, public sector adoption pilots.
2026–2035Industrialization and wider adoption across sectors, certification frameworks, matured data governance, regional implementations.
2036–2045Consolidation toward national outcomes aligned with Indonesia 2045; review of long‑term societal impacts and legal/regulatory instruments.

Sources and References

SourceType
Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia 2020–2045 (BPPT / Stranas KA PDF)Primary Source
BPPT press release — Stranas KA launch (BPPT portal)Primary Source
Ministry of Communication and Informatics (Kominfo) — public statements on AI alignmentPrimary Source / Institutional

Requirements for a company

What an organisation has to do under Indonesia - National AI Strategy, at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.

Not yet in force (Adopted). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.

Must do

10
  • Designate a lead unit and coordinate an inter-agency implementation plan.Government agencies and ministries involved in AI strategy.
  • Initiate prioritized AI pilot projects in health, public services, education, food security, and smart cities.Government agencies, industry, and academia in priority sectors.
  • Develop data standards, metadata, secure repositories, and access frameworks for AI ecosystems.Government agencies, data providers, and infrastructure operators.
  • Adopt AI curricula, competency frameworks, and certification programs.Educational institutions, professional bodies, and government.
  • Establish an ethics working group, implement model documentation, transparency practices, and audit trails.All organizations developing or deploying AI systems.
  • Implement AI model and infrastructure security measures and incident response plans.All organizations developing or deploying AI systems.
  • +4 more in the table below

Must not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should do

2
  • Utilize regulatory sandboxes for testing high-impact AI applications under oversight.Innovators and developers of high-impact AI systems.
  • Align AI governance with international norms and standards and participate in multilateral dialogues.Government agencies and policymakers.

Should not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Who must do what

The obligations under Indonesia - National AI Strategy, most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

#WhoRequirementBy whenWhereSeverity
1Government agencies and ministries involved in AI strategy.Designate a lead unit and coordinate an inter-agency implementation plan.
Stranas KA recommends a coordinated, multi‑stakeholder governance architecture to orchestrate national AI efforts.
Governance and Institutional FrameworkImportant
2Government agencies, industry, and academia in priority sectors.Initiate prioritized AI pilot projects in health, public services, education, food security, and smart cities.
The strategy proposes short, medium and long‑term actions: initial pilots (2020–2024) to validate high‑impact use cases.
Dec 31, 2024Implementation FrameworkImportant
3Government agencies, data providers, and infrastructure operators.Develop data standards, metadata, secure repositories, and access frameworks for AI ecosystems.
Cross‑cutting enablers include... data ecosystems (standards, secure data repositories, synthetic data where needed).
Key Focus AreasImportant
4Educational institutions, professional bodies, and government.Adopt AI curricula, competency frameworks, and certification programs.
Cross‑cutting enablers include talent development (education, certifications, competency frameworks).
Key Focus AreasImportant
5All organizations developing or deploying AI systems.Establish an ethics working group, implement model documentation, transparency practices, and audit trails.
The strategy stresses ethical considerations — fairness, non‑discrimination, transparency and accountability.
Key Focus AreasImportant
6All organizations developing or deploying AI systems.Implement AI model and infrastructure security measures and incident response plans.
The strategy stresses ethical considerations... and recommends safety testing, validation of AI models, and cybersecurity measures for deployed systems.
Key Focus AreasImportant
7Organizations developing or deploying AI systems.Conduct safety testing and validation of AI models before deployment.
The strategy stresses ethical considerations... and recommends safety testing, validation of AI models, and cybersecurity measures for deployed systems.
Before deploymentKey Focus AreasImportant
8The designated lead coordinating body (e.g., implementation secretariat).Establish a public dashboard and publish annual progress reports tracking AI strategy KPIs.
It recommends an implementation secretariat to publish annual progress reports and maintain a public dashboard tracking KPIs.
Monitoring and EvaluationImportant
9Ministries and regional governments.Integrate AI plans into ministerial workplans and regional development strategies.
The document recommends... integrating AI plans into ministerial workplans and regional development strategies.
Implementation FrameworkImportant
10The designated lead coordinating body and relevant ministries.Create working groups on data governance and standards.
It also suggests creation of working groups on ethics, standards, data governance and talent.
Governance and Institutional FrameworkImportant
11Innovators and developers of high-impact AI systems.Utilize regulatory sandboxes for testing high-impact AI applications under oversight.
Key instruments include... regulatory sandboxes for testing high‑impact applications under oversight.
Implementation FrameworkRecommended
12Government agencies and policymakers.Align AI governance with international norms and standards and participate in multilateral dialogues.
The strategy recommends aligning Indonesia’s AI governance with international norms and standards and participating in multilateral dialogues.
International AlignmentRecommended

© Regulations.AI · updated on 13-Jun-2026