Poland - AI Development Roadmap
Roadmap for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland
Mapa drogowa rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce
Poland
RAI-PL-NA-RDAIPXX-2019The 'Roadmap for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland' is a strategic, government‑led initiative launched through a national conference on 22–23 January 2019 to coordinate public, academic and private sector activity on AI. It set out priorities, stakeholder roles and commitments that led to a subsequent inter‑ministerial memorandum (February 2019) and the formal national AI Policy adopted in 2020.
Summary
The Roadmap for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland (Mapa drogowa rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce) originated as a two‑day government conference convened on 22–23 January 2019 that brought together ministries, industry, academia and civil society to begin a coordinated national effort on artificial intelligence. The roadmap is a strategic, non‑binding framework rather than a statutory regulation: its aim was to map key capability gaps, topic areas (research, skills, data, public sector adoption, ethics and regulation), and institutional responsibilities to accelerate Poland’s AI ecosystem.
The 2019 roadmap defined high‑level objectives: (1) build national AI research and development capacity; (2) enable access to high‑quality data and promote open data where appropriate; (3) develop skills and education at scale; (4) foster public‑private partnerships and pilots in priority sectors; (5) ensure ethical, trustworthy and human‑centred AI; and (6) align Poland’s approach with EU and OECD workstreams. Following the conference, key ministries moved to formalize cooperation, culminating in a Memorandum of Cooperation on AI (February 26, 2019) and later the Government’s “Policy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland from 2020” adopted by the Council of Ministers on 28 December 2020. The roadmap acted as a catalyst for creating working groups, launching pilot projects, and preparing legislative and policy instruments that align with EU coordination documents.
As a framework document (and a convening process), the Roadmap places emphasis on governance mechanisms (inter‑ministerial coordination, expert groups), capacity building (centres of excellence, funding instruments, NCBR initiatives), and practical measures (data access, digital infrastructure, testbeds). It recommended that public administration experiment with AI use cases, that industry and academia deepen R&D collaboration, and that government engage internationally (EU, OECD, Global Partnership on AI).
Because the roadmap itself was not prescriptive law it imposes no direct sanctions; enforcement and mandatory obligations emerged later through policy instruments, funding calls and sectoral regulation. The Roadmap remains relevant as the foundational strategic orientation that informed Poland’s subsequent AI policy adoption, the creation of advisory groups and the launching of education, research and public‑sector pilot programmes. Primary official references for the roadmap and its subsequent outputs are maintained on the Polish government AI portal and ministerial pages. These sources document the conference, the memorandum of cooperation, and the later 2020 policy adopted by the Council of Ministers.
Full article
Read full text ↗Overview
The Roadmap for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland was initiated via a national two‑day conference held on 22–23 January 2019 that convened government ministries, industry representatives, academic leaders and civil society to identify priorities and build a cross‑sectoral agenda for AI in Poland. The conference was hosted by the then Ministry of Entrepreneurship and Technology and reported on by government portals, establishing a non‑binding strategic trajectory that led to the inter‑ministerial Memorandum on the Development of AI (26 February 2019) and subsequently influenced the adoption of the national policy adopted by the Council of Ministers in December 2020 ("Polityka dla rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce od roku 2020"). The roadmap functioned primarily as a convening and agenda‑setting instrument to align stakeholders, propose priority sectors, and recommend governance and investment measures to accelerate responsible AI development across Poland.
Definitions
For the purposes of the roadmap and follow‑on work, "artificial intelligence" was framed broadly to include machine learning, data analytics, computer vision, natural language processing and related techniques used to automate, augment or support decision‑making. The document distinguished between foundational activities (research, dataset curation and compute infrastructure), applied projects (sectoral pilots, SMEs adoption) and governance actions (ethics, standards, legal frameworks). The roadmap emphasised human‑centric AI, referencing international principles such as transparency, accountability, safety and respect for fundamental rights.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The roadmap recommended an inter‑ministerial coordination structure to align ministries, research funders and regulators and proposed the creation of expert advisory groups and multi‑stakeholder fora to translate strategic objectives into actionable programmes. It specifically proposed institutional roles for: (i) central administration to convene and fund national priorities; (ii) research agencies (e.g. NCBR) to channel R&D finance; (iii) universities and research centres to build deep‑tech competence; (iv) industry and start‑ups to lead pilots and commercialization; and (v) civil society to ensure ethical and rights‑respecting deployment. These proposals served as the basis for subsequent structures described on the official AI portal and in the 2020 national policy; see the government's AI portal for institutional updates at Portal Sztucznej Inteligencji GOV.pl.
Key Focus Areas
The roadmap identified multiple priority areas that informed Poland's AI agenda: 1) Skills and education — scaling university programmes, reskilling initiatives and interdisciplinary curricula; 2) Research & innovation — creating centres of excellence, increasing public R&D funding and strengthening industry‑academia collaboration; 3) Data availability and infrastructure — promoting open government data, building national compute capacity and secure data spaces; 4) Public sector adoption — piloting AI in health, transport, public administration and services to improve outcomes and create demand; 5) Ethics, trust and human rights — aligning development with EU and OECD values on trustworthy AI; 6) Support for SMEs — lowering barriers for adoption through marketplaces, vouchers and incubation; 7) Testbeds and safety evaluation — establishing environments for testing algorithms and systems; 8) International cooperation — coordinating with EU, OECD and bilateral partners. The roadmap stressed prioritising sectors where Poland has competitive advantage (e.g., IT services, manufacturing, health) and the need to balance innovation with safeguards for fundamental rights.
Implementation Framework
Implementation was designed as a phased, multi‑actor effort. Short‑term measures included the creation of working groups, launching pilot projects, and producing mapping studies of capabilities and gaps. Medium‑term actions foresaw targeted funding programmes, establishing national centres, and public procurement pilots to stimulate demand. Longer‑term measures targeted legal and regulatory adaptation aligned with EU workstreams. The roadmap emphasised iterative policy design, enabling experiments and rapid learning cycles — an approach later reflected in the Government’s 2020 policy and in the memorandum of cooperation among ministries (referenced on the official site Ministerial AI pages).
Monitoring and Evaluation
The roadmap proposed a monitoring approach based on measurable targets and regular stakeholder reporting. Recommended indicators included R&D expenditure, number of AI projects/pilots in public administration, workforce metrics (graduates and retrained professionals), data availability metrics, and indicators of uptake among SMEs. It recommended periodic public reporting, external expert reviews and alignment of national indicators with EU and OECD observatories to facilitate benchmarking and international comparison.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
As a strategic, non‑binding framework, the roadmap does not itself establish sanctions or enforcement mechanisms. Instead, it recommended that legal liability, remedies and appeals be addressed in sectoral legislation and in future binding regulations, consistent with EU rule‑making (including the EU AI Act process which followed). The roadmap called for clarity on liability regimes for AI used in high‑impact domains and for procedural routes for contesting automated decisions — matters later given concrete form in sectoral policy and EU‑level proposals.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The roadmap explicitly situates Poland’s approach within EU and OECD frameworks — notably the Commission’s Coordinated Plan on AI (2018), the EC Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (2019), and OECD recommendations — and served as a national precursor to the 2020 "Policy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland from 2020". It recommended harmonisation with international standards and cited the need to leverage EU funding instruments. The roadmap also informed national memoranda and the formation of advisory groups and testbed activities referenced on official portals.
International Alignment
The roadmap called for active Polish engagement in EU and OECD processes and for bilateral cooperation with academic and industry partners. It underlined the need to align national principles with the EU's human‑centred approach and to participate in international benchmarking and standardisation efforts. That orientation led Polish authorities to participate in EU consultations, OECD initiatives and later the Global Partnership on AI, ensuring policy coherence and access to international cooperation and funding streams.
Implementation Timeline
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| National conference & launch of Roadmap | 2019-01-22 |
| Inter‑ministerial Memorandum on AI | 2019-02-26 |
| Consultations and working groups | 2019–2020 |
| Adoption of national AI Policy by Council of Ministers | 2020-12-28 |
Sources and References
Requirements for a company
What an organisation has to do under Poland - AI Development Roadmap, at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.
Not yet in force (Adopted). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.
Must do
0Nothing in this category.
Must not do
0Nothing in this category.
Should do
15- Create an inter-ministerial coordination structure.Central government ministries
- Establish expert advisory groups and multi-stakeholder fora.Central government ministries
- Increase public funding for AI research and development.Central administration, research agencies
- Create AI research centers of excellence.Research agencies, universities
- Scale university AI programs and reskilling initiatives.Education bodies, universities
- Promote open government data for AI development.Central administration
- +9 more in the table below
Should not do
0Nothing in this category.
Who must do what
The obligations under Poland - AI Development Roadmap, most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
| # | Who | Requirement | By when | Where | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Central government ministries | Create an inter-ministerial coordination structure. “The roadmap recommended an inter-ministerial coordination structure to align ministries...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 2 | Central government ministries | Establish expert advisory groups and multi-stakeholder fora. “...proposed the creation of expert advisory groups and multi-stakeholder fora...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 3 | Central administration, research agencies | Increase public funding for AI research and development. “...increasing public R&D funding and strengthening industry-academia collaboration;” | — | — | Recommended |
| 4 | Research agencies, universities | Create AI research centers of excellence. “...creating centres of excellence, increasing public R&D funding...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 5 | Education bodies, universities | Scale university AI programs and reskilling initiatives. “Skills and education — scaling university programmes, reskilling initiatives...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 6 | Central administration | Promote open government data for AI development. “Data availability and infrastructure — promoting open government data...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 7 | Central administration | Build national compute capacity for AI. “...building national compute capacity and secure data spaces;” | — | — | Recommended |
| 8 | Public administration, industry | Pilot AI systems in public administration, health, and transport. “Public sector adoption — piloting AI in health, transport, public administration...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 9 | All AI developers and deployers | Align AI development with EU and OECD ethical values. “Ethics, trust and human rights — aligning development with EU and OECD values...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 10 | Central administration | Lower AI adoption barriers for small and medium enterprises. “Support for SMEs — lowering barriers for adoption through marketplaces...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 11 | Central administration, research agencies | Establish testbeds for AI algorithm and system evaluation. “Testbeds and safety evaluation — establishing environments for testing algorithms...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 12 | Central administration | Coordinate AI policy with EU, OECD, and international partners. “International cooperation — coordinating with EU, OECD and bilateral partners.” | — | — | Recommended |
| 13 | Central administration | Monitor AI development using measurable targets and indicators. “The roadmap proposed a monitoring approach based on measurable targets...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 14 | Central administration | Publish periodic reports on AI development progress. “It recommended periodic public reporting, external expert reviews...” | — | — | Recommended |
| 15 | Research councils, ministries | Map national AI research and development assets. “Map national R&D and data assets” | — | — | Recommended |
Related Regulations
Policy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland from 2020 (Polityka dla rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce od roku 2020) – Polityka rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce na lata 2019–2027
Poland96% similar
Memorandum for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland
Poland96% similar
Assumptions to AI Strategy in Poland (Proposition for an AI Strategy; Plan of activities of the Ministry of Digital Affairs)
Poland95% similar
Poland AI Regulation Overview
Poland92% similar
Draft Act on Artificial Intelligence Systems (Projekt ustawy o systemach sztucznej inteligencji)
Poland91% similar
© Regulations.AI · updated on 13-Jun-2026