United Nations - AI for Sustainable Development
Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development
United Nations
RAI-XN-GO-SOSSTXX-2024UNGA Resolution A/RES/78/265 establishes a global framework for safe, secure, and trustworthy AI, promoting sustainable development and human rights.
Summary
Read full text ↗Plain English
Overview
The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted Resolution A/RES/78/265, titled "Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development," on March 21, 2024. This landmark resolution represents the first comprehensive document by the UNGA specifically addressing artificial intelligence (AI) and its governance. It acknowledges the transformative potential of AI to accelerate progress across all 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and foster sustainable development in its economic, social, and environmental dimensions. The resolution underscores that AI systems, when developed and deployed responsibly, can promote digital transformation, bridge digital divides, and advance human rights. It reflects a global consensus on the necessity of a human-centric approach to AI, ensuring that its benefits are broadly shared while mitigating its inherent risks. The document serves as a crucial guiding framework for Member States, the private sector, civil society, and other stakeholders in shaping national and international policies on AI, emphasizing inclusivity, transparency, and accountability throughout the AI lifecycle.
The resolution, adopted without a vote and co-sponsored by a significant number of Member States, highlights the urgency of establishing international norms and principles for AI governance. It stresses that AI development must be consistent with international law, particularly the Charter of the United Nations and international human rights law. The text calls upon all stakeholders to promote safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems that respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, especially for those in vulnerable situations. Furthermore, it recognizes the importance of addressing the potential for malicious use of AI and its detrimental impact on human rights and state security. While non-binding in nature, this resolution sets a powerful precedent for future international discussions and regulatory frameworks concerning AI, advocating for a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach to ensure AI serves humanity for good.
Definitions
The resolution implicitly and explicitly defines several key concepts crucial for understanding its scope and intent. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems" are understood broadly as technologies capable of displaying intelligent behavior, often through learning, reasoning, and problem-solving, with the potential to operate autonomously. The document emphasizes the importance of "safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems," which are characterized by their human-centric design, reliability, explainability, ethical foundations, and inclusivity. These systems are expected to fully respect, promote, and protect human rights and international law throughout their entire lifecycle, from pre-design and development to deployment, use, and decommissioning. This definition underpins the resolution's call for a responsible and ethical approach to AI innovation and application.
Another central concept is "sustainable development," referencing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The resolution positions AI as a powerful enabler for achieving these global goals, recognizing its potential to drive progress in areas such as poverty eradication, health, education, climate action, and peace. It also addresses "digital divides," acknowledging the disparities in access to and benefits from information and communication technologies, including AI, between and within countries. The resolution calls for concerted efforts to bridge these divides through enhanced international cooperation and capacity-building, ensuring equitable participation and representation of developing countries in global AI governance discussions. The emphasis on "human rights and fundamental freedoms" is paramount, asserting that the same rights people have offline must be protected online and throughout the AI system lifecycle.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The UNGA Resolution A/RES/78/265 establishes a foundational, albeit non-binding, governance framework for AI on a global scale. It explicitly acknowledges the significant role of the United Nations system in fostering international cooperation and multi-stakeholder collaboration on AI governance. The resolution encourages Member States to develop national policies and regulatory frameworks that promote safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems, aligning with international law and human rights principles. It stresses the need for cohesive, effective, coordinated, and inclusive engagement from all communities, particularly those in developing countries, to ensure equitable participation in AI governance discussions. This framework is designed to be adaptable, allowing for diverse national approaches while promoting a shared global vision for responsible AI development and deployment.
Furthermore, the resolution calls upon various stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, international and regional organizations, academia, and technical communities, to work together. It encourages the private sector to adhere to applicable international and domestic laws and to act in line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The document also takes note of existing efforts by UN bodies, such as the International Telecommunication Union's (ITU) AI for Good platform and UNESCO's Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, integrating these initiatives into a broader UN vision for AI governance. This multi-stakeholder approach aims to leverage diverse expertise and perspectives to address the complex challenges and opportunities presented by AI, ensuring that governance mechanisms are robust, inclusive, and forward-looking.
Key Focus Areas
The resolution identifies several key focus areas to guide the development and deployment of AI systems. Central among these is the imperative to promote "safe, secure and trustworthy AI systems" that are human-centric, reliable, explainable, ethical, and inclusive. This encompasses ensuring that AI systems fully respect, promote, and protect human rights and international law throughout their entire lifecycle. The document explicitly calls upon Member States and other stakeholders to refrain from or cease the use of AI systems that cannot comply with international human rights law or pose undue risks to human rights, particularly for vulnerable populations. The resolution also highlights the importance of addressing risks associated with biased data, which can reinforce inequalities and discrimination, urging international cooperation to mitigate such harms.
Another critical focus area is the acceleration of progress towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The resolution views AI as a powerful tool for achieving the SDGs, emphasizing its potential to contribute to economic growth, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability. To realize this potential, the document stresses the need to bridge the "artificial intelligence and other digital divides" between and within countries. This involves enhancing digital infrastructure, improving access to technological innovations, and mobilizing means of implementation such as technology transfer, capacity building, technical assistance, and financing for developing countries. The resolution also encourages research and international cooperation to understand and balance the potential benefits and risks of AI in achieving the SDGs, including the role of open-source AI systems.
Implementation Framework
The implementation framework outlined in UNGA Resolution A/RES/78/265 is rooted in a call for collaborative action and adherence to international principles, rather than prescriptive mandates. It encourages Member States to formulate and implement national policies and regulatory frameworks for AI that are consistent with their international legal obligations, particularly concerning human rights. This includes fostering an enabling environment for innovation while ensuring robust safeguards against potential harms. The resolution emphasizes the importance of enhancing digital infrastructure connectivity and access to technological innovations, especially in developing countries, to ensure their meaningful participation throughout the AI system lifecycle and to accelerate AI's positive contributions to society.
The framework also highlights the critical role of international cooperation and multi-stakeholder partnerships. It urges the international community to mobilize resources, including technology transfer on mutually agreed terms, capacity building, technical assistance, and financing, to help developing countries address their national needs and priorities related to AI systems. The resolution encourages the promotion of access to, and the design, development, deployment, and use of, safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems to achieve sustainable development. Furthermore, it acknowledges the importance of continuing discussions on AI governance developments to ensure that international approaches evolve alongside AI systems and their uses, promoting inclusive research and analysis to inform effective, internationally interoperable safeguards, practices, standards, and tools for all AI stakeholders.
Monitoring and Evaluation
While UNGA resolutions typically do not establish explicit, legally binding monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, Resolution A/RES/78/265 implicitly calls for ongoing assessment and adaptation. It acknowledges the importance of continuing the discussion on developments in AI governance to ensure that international approaches keep pace with the rapid evolution of AI systems and their uses. This implies a continuous process of observation, analysis, and dialogue among Member States and stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness of adopted principles and identify emerging challenges and opportunities. The resolution encourages sustained efforts by the international community to promote inclusive research, mapping, and analysis regarding the potential impacts and applications of AI systems on achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
The document's emphasis on "internationally interoperable safeguards, practices, standards and tools" suggests a need for common metrics and benchmarks that could facilitate a form of peer review or comparative assessment of national AI strategies. By stressing the need for cohesive, effective, coordinated, and inclusive engagement and participation of all communities, particularly from developing countries, in the governance of safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems, the resolution advocates for a participatory monitoring approach. This collective engagement would allow for the sharing of best practices, identification of gaps, and collaborative problem-solving, thereby contributing to an evolving understanding of how AI is impacting sustainable development and human rights globally.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
As a non-binding United Nations General Assembly resolution, A/RES/78/265 does not prescribe specific penalties, liability regimes, or appeal mechanisms for non-compliance. Its primary function is to establish a global normative framework and encourage Member States to adopt responsible AI practices. The resolution places the onus on individual Member States to develop and implement national policies and regulatory frameworks that align with its principles and their existing international legal obligations. This means that any legal consequences, liability provisions, or avenues for appeal related to AI systems would fall under national jurisdictions or existing international human rights mechanisms.
However, the resolution strongly emphasizes that human rights and fundamental freedoms must be respected, protected, and promoted throughout the life cycle of AI systems. It calls upon Member States and other stakeholders to refrain from or cease the use of AI systems that are impossible to operate in compliance with international human rights law or that pose undue risks to the enjoyment of human rights. This implicitly underscores the importance of accountability and redress, even if the resolution itself does not detail the specific legal instruments for achieving them. The encouragement for the private sector to adhere to international and domestic laws and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights further reinforces the expectation that accountability for AI-related harms should be addressed through existing legal and ethical frameworks.
Relationship to Other Instruments
UNGA Resolution A/RES/78/265 explicitly situates itself within the broader context of international law and existing UN instruments. It reaffirms international law, particularly the Charter of the United Nations, and recalls the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, establishing these as foundational pillars for AI governance. The resolution also reaffirms the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, positioning AI as a critical enabler for achieving its goals. This integration ensures that AI development and deployment are not treated in isolation but are firmly anchored in established global commitments to peace, human rights, and sustainable development. By doing so, the resolution reinforces the principle that AI technologies must serve humanity's collective well-being and uphold universal values.
Furthermore, the resolution takes note of specific efforts and recommendations from other UN bodies, demonstrating a coordinated approach to AI governance within the UN system. It acknowledges the work of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) through its AI for Good platform and the adoption by the General Conference of UNESCO of its Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. These references indicate that the UNGA resolution seeks to complement and build upon existing ethical guidelines and initiatives, promoting a coherent and comprehensive international discourse on AI. It also takes note of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, endorsed by the Human Rights Council, thereby extending the principles of responsible conduct to the private sector involved in AI development and deployment.
International Alignment
International alignment is a core tenet of UNGA Resolution A/RES/78/265, which was adopted by consensus with the co-sponsorship of 125 states, signaling a broad global agreement on the principles of AI governance. The resolution explicitly calls for enhancing international cooperation on capacity-building of AI and bridging the digital divides between and within countries. It emphasizes the need for a global consensus on the future development and implementation of safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems, consistent with international law. This commitment to international alignment aims to prevent fragmentation in AI governance, fostering a harmonized approach that respects diverse national contexts while upholding universal values and principles.
The document encourages continued efforts by the international community to promote inclusive research, mapping, and analysis to inform the development of effective, internationally interoperable safeguards, practices, standards, and tools for all AI stakeholders. It stresses the importance of cohesive, effective, coordinated, and inclusive engagement and participation of all communities, particularly from developing countries, in the inclusive governance of AI. This focus on global collaboration and shared responsibility is crucial for addressing the transnational nature of AI's impacts and ensuring that AI technologies contribute to a more equitable and sustainable global future. The resolution's emphasis on multilateralism and multi-stakeholder engagement underscores its ambition to create a globally aligned framework for responsible AI.
Implementation Timeline
| Milestone | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution Adoption | 2024-03-21 | United Nations General Assembly adopts A/RES/78/265. |
| National Policy Development (Ongoing) | Ongoing | Member States are encouraged to develop and implement national AI policies and regulatory frameworks consistent with the resolution's principles. |
| International Cooperation and Capacity Building (Ongoing) | Ongoing | Continuous efforts by the international community to foster cooperation, technology transfer, and capacity building, especially for developing countries. |
| Multi-stakeholder Engagement (Ongoing) | Ongoing | Governments, private sector, civil society, academia, and technical communities are encouraged to continue working together on AI governance. |
| Monitoring and Evaluation of AI Developments (Ongoing) | Ongoing | Ongoing discussion and analysis of AI governance developments to ensure international approaches keep pace with technological evolution. |
| Reporting on SDG Progress (Periodic) | As per SDG review cycles | Member States and UN system to report on progress towards SDGs, including AI's contribution and impact. |
Compliance Checklist
| Check | Required Action |
|---|---|
| Adherence to International Law | Ensure all AI system development, deployment, and use comply with international law, including the UN Charter and international human rights law. |
| Human Rights Impact Assessment | Conduct assessments to ensure AI systems respect, protect, and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms throughout their lifecycle. |
| Risk Mitigation | Implement measures to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with AI systems, including those related to bias, discrimination, and malicious use. |
| Transparency and Explainability | Promote transparency and explainability in AI systems, where appropriate, to foster trust and accountability. |
| Inclusivity and Non-discrimination | Ensure AI systems are designed and used in an inclusive manner, avoiding discrimination and promoting equitable access to benefits, especially for vulnerable populations. |
| Capacity Building Support | Contribute to and participate in international efforts for AI capacity building, particularly for developing countries, to bridge digital divides. |
| Multi-stakeholder Collaboration | Engage with governments, private sector, civil society, and academia to foster a collaborative approach to AI governance. |
| Alignment with SDGs | Align AI strategies and initiatives with the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals. |
| Responsible Private Sector Conduct | Encourage the private sector to adhere to applicable international and domestic laws and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. |
Sources and References
| Source | Type |
|---|---|
| Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly (A/RES/78/265) | official |
This United Nations General Assembly resolution establishes a global framework for the responsible development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, applying to all nations, companies, and organizations involved in AI.
The resolution broadly applies to all stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, academia, and technical communities globally. It aims to guide anyone designing, developing, deploying, or using AI. A central obligation is to promote safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems that are human-centric, reliable, and ethical. Crucially, all AI systems must fully respect, protect, and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms throughout their entire lifecycle, from initial design to eventual decommissioning. The resolution also urges stakeholders to refrain from or cease using AI systems that cannot comply with international human rights law or pose undue risks to human rights, particularly for vulnerable populations. Furthermore, it emphasizes leveraging AI to accelerate progress towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, including bridging digital divides through enhanced international cooperation and capacity building, especially for developing countries.
This framework was adopted and became effective on March 21, 2024. It is important to note that as a non-binding resolution, it does not impose direct penalties, liability, or appeal mechanisms for non-compliance. Its primary role is to establish a global normative standard, encouraging individual nations to develop their own AI policies and regulations consistent with these principles and existing international law. Any legal consequences would therefore arise from national laws or existing international human rights frameworks.
A practical pitfall for product managers and founders is to underestimate the resolution's influence. While not directly enforceable, it sets a powerful global expectation for ethical and human rights-aligned AI. Ignoring these principles could lead to significant reputational damage, future national regulatory challenges as countries integrate these guidelines into their own binding laws, or difficulties in international partnerships.
Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.
What you must do — compliance checklist
0 / 10 marked completePlain-English obligations under United Nations - AI for Sustainable Development. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
- #1Critical⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Member States and all stakeholders developing or deploying AI systems.
“It stresses that AI development must be consistent with international law, particularly the Charter of the United Nations and international human rights law.”
- #2Critical⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Member States and all stakeholders developing or deploying AI systems.
“It calls upon Member States and other stakeholders to refrain from or cease the use of AI systems that cannot comply with international human rights law or pose undue risks to human rights.”
- #3Critical⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Member States and all stakeholders developing or deploying AI systems.
“The resolution also highlights the importance of addressing risks associated with biased data, which can reinforce inequalities and discrimination, urging international cooperation to mitigate such harms.”
- #4Important⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Member States and all stakeholders developing or deploying AI systems.
“safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems," which are characterized by their human-centric design, reliability, explainability, ethical foundations, and inclusivity.”
- #5Important⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Member States and all stakeholders developing or deploying AI systems.
“These systems are expected to fully respect, promote, and protect human rights and international law throughout their entire lifecycle... ethical foundations, and inclusivity.”
- #6Important⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Member States.
“It encourages Member States to develop national policies and regulatory frameworks that promote safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems, aligning with international law and human rights principles.”
- #7Important⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Member States and the international community.
“This involves enhancing digital infrastructure, improving access to technological innovations, and mobilizing means of implementation such as technology transfer, capacity building, technical assistance, and financing for developing countries.”
- #8Important⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Private sector entities involved in AI.
“It encourages the private sector to adhere to applicable international and domestic laws and to act in line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.”
- #9Recommended⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Governments, private sector, civil society, academia, technical communities.
“The resolution calls upon various stakeholders... to work together.”
- #10Recommended⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Member States and all stakeholders.
“The resolution positions AI as a powerful enabler for achieving these global goals...”
Related Regulations
Resolution A/RES/79/1 - Annex II: Global Digital Compact
United Nations95% similar
Principles for the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in the United Nations System
United Nations94% similar
Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
UNESCO93% similar
Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report of the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence
United Nations93% similar
AI for Good Global Summit Report 2017
ITU92% similar
© Regulations.AI — created on 30-Dec-2025 using Gemini 2.5 Flash