ISO AI Risk Management Guidance

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 - Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Guidance on risk management

ISO

RAI-XS-GO-MANAGEM-2023
Effective: 6 Feb 2023
In Force(In Force)As published at iso.org · checked 9 Sep 2026

ISO AI Risk Management Guidance is In Force in ISO as of 9 Sep 2026, according to iso.org.

StandardRisk ManagementGovernance and OversightSafety, Testing, and Evaluation
Export PDF

Standard ISO/IEC 23894:2023 guides organizations on identifying and managing risks specific to artificial intelligence systems throughout their lifecycle, established by ISO and IEC in 2023. The voluntary guidance standard is currently in force, having taken effect on February 6, 2023.

Summary

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 remains in force as an international guidance standard for artificial intelligence risk management. Originally published on February 6, 2023, by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the standard was endorsed in Europe as EN ISO/IEC 23894:2024 on February 12, 2024, with European national standards bodies completing their national adoptions by August 2024.

The standard adapts the established framework and vocabulary of ISO 31000:2018 to the specific operational realities and risk characteristics of artificial intelligence systems. It provides structured guidance across the entire AI system lifecycle for identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating AI-specific risks, including algorithmic bias, data dependencies, opacity, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. ISO/IEC 23894:2023 functions as a practical companion to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 by detailing risk management methods within an overarching artificial intelligence management system.

As a voluntary guidance standard rather than a certifiable requirements framework, no statutory or regulatory body directly enforces ISO/IEC 23894:2023, and organizations cannot receive formal certification against it. However, national standards bodies oversight its publication and maintenance, while enterprises across diverse sectors voluntarily implement its guidelines to structure risk registers and align internal practices with international standards and regulatory expectations.

Full article

Read full text ↗

Overview

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 provides comprehensive guidance on risk management specifically tailored for artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Published in February 2023, this international standard addresses the unique risk characteristics and challenges inherent in AI technologies, offering a structured approach for organizations to identify, analyze, evaluate, and treat AI-specific risks effectively. It serves as a crucial companion to the broader ISO 31000:2018 (Risk management — Guidelines) and integrates seamlessly with ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system), providing the 'how' for managing AI risks within an AI management system. The standard is designed to assist organizations that develop, produce, deploy, or use AI systems to harness AI's transformative potential responsibly, protect stakeholders from potential harms, meet regulatory expectations, and build essential trust in AI systems for sustainable success.

The significance of ISO/IEC 23894:2023 stems from the increasing integration of AI into critical business processes, products, and societal functions, which introduces novel and complex risks that traditional risk management frameworks often fail to adequately address. These AI-specific challenges include the complexity and opacity of many AI models (often termed 'black boxes'), fundamental dependency on training data quality and representativeness, potential for learning and adaptation to create uncertain or emergent behaviors, and sensitivity to deployment context. By providing a dedicated framework, the standard helps organizations navigate these intricacies, ensuring that AI initiatives are not only innovative but also safe, ethical, and trustworthy.

Definitions

For the purposes of ISO/IEC 23894:2023, key terms and definitions are primarily drawn from foundational ISO documents. Specifically, the standard refers to ISO 31000:2018 (Risk management — Guidelines) for general risk management terminology, ISO Guide 73:2009 (Risk management — Vocabulary) for a broader vocabulary related to risk, and ISO/IEC 22989:2022 (Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Artificial intelligence concepts and terminology) for AI-specific concepts. These normative references ensure a consistent understanding of terms across related international standards, facilitating interoperability and clarity in AI risk management practices. Organizations are encouraged to consult these foundational documents for a comprehensive understanding of the terminology used within ISO/IEC 23894:2023.

While relying on established definitions, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 implicitly or explicitly addresses several critical AI-specific concepts through its guidance. For instance, the 'AI system lifecycle' is a central concept, encompassing all phases from inception and design to retirement, emphasizing that risks can emerge at any stage. 'AI risk management' itself is defined by the standard's guidance as the systematic process of identifying, assessing, treating, and monitoring risks unique to AI systems. Furthermore, the standard delves into 'AI-specific risks,' which include issues like algorithmic bias, data quality and bias, model limitations, security vulnerabilities, privacy violations, safety risks, fairness issues, transparency and explainability limitations, human oversight challenges, and emergent behaviors that are not typically covered by traditional risk frameworks.

Governance and Institutional Framework

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 was developed under the auspices of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the Artificial Intelligence subcommittee of the Joint Technical Committee 1 (JTC 1) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). This joint committee is the world's premier technical body dedicated to standardization in the field of Artificial Intelligence. Established at the 32nd ISO/IEC JTC 1 Plenary in Vladivostok, Russia, SC 42 serves as the focal point for AI standardization within ISO and IEC, with a broad mandate to develop international standards, technical reports, and specifications across the entire AI ecosystem. Its work encompasses foundational AI standards, data standards related to AI, big data and analytics, AI trustworthiness, use cases, applications, governance implications, computational approaches, testing of AI systems, and ethical and societal concerns.

The role of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 extends beyond mere document creation; it is scoped to provide guidance to other ISO and IEC committees that are developing Artificial Intelligence applications, ensuring a coherent and integrated approach to AI standardization globally. The committee organizes bi-annual AI workshops, fostering dialogue among innovators, researchers, deployers, and policymakers to gather insights that inform its strategic planning and roadmap for future work. This collaborative and comprehensive governance framework ensures that standards like ISO/IEC 23894:2023 are developed with global expertise, addressing diverse cultural, regulatory, and technological contexts, and promoting the safe, ethical, and effective operation of AI systems across international markets.

Key Provisions

The key provisions of ISO/IEC 23894:2023 offer comprehensive guidance on managing risks throughout the entire lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems. The standard systematically outlines processes for identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating AI-specific risks, emphasizing that these risks can emerge at any stage from inception and design to deployment and retirement. It details various AI-specific risk sources, including issues related to data quality and bias, model limitations and failures, security vulnerabilities and adversarial attacks, privacy violations, safety risks from errors or malfunctions, fairness and discrimination, transparency and explainability limitations, human oversight and control challenges, environmental impacts, and broader societal and ethical concerns.

A critical aspect of the standard's provisions is its focus on the unique characteristics of AI that differentiate its risk landscape from traditional IT systems. These include the inherent complexity and opacity of many AI models, the fundamental dependency on the quality and representativeness of training data, the potential for AI systems to learn and adapt over time leading to emergent and unpredictable behaviors, and their sensitivity to deployment contexts that may differ from training conditions. ISO/IEC 23894:2023 provides guidance on how to assess the likelihood and potential impact of these risks, including considering cascading effects and interdependencies in AI risk scenarios. It also offers strategies for risk treatment, which may involve modifying AI model design, functionality, or implementing specific mitigation controls, thereby enabling organizations to develop and implement robust AI risk management strategies.

Scope and Application

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 is broadly applicable to any organization involved in the artificial intelligence ecosystem, specifically those that develop, produce, deploy, or use products, systems, and services utilizing AI. The standard's guidance is designed to be flexible and customizable, allowing organizations to tailor its application to their specific context, operational environment, and the nature of their AI-related activities and functions. This adaptability ensures that organizations of varying sizes, sectors, and levels of AI maturity can effectively integrate AI risk management into their existing processes, regardless of whether they are an AI developer, a deployer of AI systems, or an end-user.

The scope of the document extends to assisting organizations in integrating risk management into all their AI-related activities. This includes embedding risk considerations throughout the entire AI system lifecycle, from the initial conceptualization and design phase through data collection, model development, testing, validation, deployment, ongoing operational monitoring, and eventual decommissioning. By providing a comprehensive framework that covers the full spectrum of AI engagement, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 aims to ensure that organizations can manage AI risks systematically and proactively, thereby safeguarding their strategic objectives, protecting stakeholders, and fostering responsible innovation in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

Implementation Framework

The implementation framework of ISO/IEC 23894:2023 is designed to be highly integrated and complementary to existing organizational risk management structures, rather than a standalone methodology. It explicitly builds upon the established principles and framework of ISO 31000:2018 (Risk management — Guidelines), extending its general guidance with AI-specific considerations. This approach ensures that organizations already aligned with ISO 31000 can adopt ISO/IEC 23894 incrementally, using the same risk management vocabulary and processes but with additional clauses tailored to the unique challenges of AI. Organizations are encouraged to integrate AI risk management with their broader organizational risk management framework to ensure coherence and efficiency.

Furthermore, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 is designed to work in close conjunction with ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system). While ISO/IEC 42001 provides the overarching framework for an AI Management System (AIMS), ISO/IEC 23894 offers the detailed 'how-to' guidance for managing AI risks within that system. This means that organizations implementing an AIMS under ISO/IEC 42001 will find ISO/IEC 23894 indispensable for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving their AI risk management processes, including bias detection, explainability tests, and data quality assurance. The standard also emphasizes a lifecycle integration approach, embedding risk considerations into every stage of AI development and deployment, from defining objectives and scope to conducting AI system inventories and forming dedicated AI risk management teams.

Monitoring and Evaluation

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 places significant emphasis on the continuous monitoring and periodic review of AI risks, recognizing that AI systems are dynamic and their associated risks can evolve over time. This ongoing oversight is crucial for ensuring that risk management practices remain effective throughout the entire AI system lifecycle. The standard highlights the importance of tracking key risk indicators to detect shifts in system performance or changes in risk exposure, allowing organizations to respond proactively to emerging risks and maintain alignment with both organizational objectives and evolving regulatory expectations.

Unlike traditional risk assessments that might be updated annually, AI systems often necessitate more frequent reassessment and continuous risk monitoring, particularly in dynamic environments or when dealing with evolving data patterns. This continuous process includes not only technical monitoring of AI system behavior but also gathering feedback on AI performance and usability, and conducting post-market surveillance. By embedding a culture of ongoing review and improvement, organizations can adapt their risk management strategies to the changing nature of AI technologies, ensuring the sustained reliability, safety, and trustworthiness of their AI deployments.

Relationship to Other Instruments

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 is not a standalone document but is deeply integrated within a broader ecosystem of international standards and frameworks, particularly those related to risk management and artificial intelligence. It is explicitly designed to be used in conjunction with ISO 31000:2018 (Risk management — Guidelines), serving as an AI-specific extension that adapts and develops the general principles of risk management. This relationship ensures consistency in risk management vocabulary and processes across an organization's activities. Furthermore, it relies on ISO Guide 73:2009 (Risk management — Vocabulary) for foundational risk terminology and ISO/IEC 22989:2022 (Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Artificial intelligence concepts and terminology) for common AI-related definitions.

The standard also has a critical relationship with the ISO/IEC 42000 series, particularly ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system). While ISO/IEC 42001 establishes the requirements for an AI Management System (AIMS), ISO/IEC 23894 provides the specific guidance on how to manage AI risks within that system, making it an essential component for achieving ISO/IEC 42001 compliance. Other related AI-specific standards include ISO/IEC 23053:2022 (Framework for AI systems using machine learning), ISO/IEC 5338:2023 (AI system life cycle processes), ISO/IEC 38507:2022 (Governance of artificial intelligence), and ISO/IEC 42005:2025 (AI system impact assessment), all of which contribute to a comprehensive AI governance and management ecosystem. Beyond ISO, it complements frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), providing a robust set of practices for identifying, analyzing, and mitigating AI risks.

International Alignment

ISO/IEC 23894:2023, as a product of the joint efforts of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) through their Joint Technical Committee 1 (JTC 1) and its subcommittee SC 42 (Artificial Intelligence), inherently embodies a high degree of international alignment. The development process involves experts from numerous member countries, ensuring that the standard reflects diverse perspectives and addresses a broad spectrum of cultural, regulatory, and technological contexts globally. This collaborative approach is fundamental to creating unified standards that promote interoperability between AI systems developed by different organizations and deployed across various international markets, thereby reducing implementation costs and accelerating time-to-market.

The standard's global applicability is further demonstrated by its adoption as a European Standard, EN ISO/IEC 23894:2024, by CEN-CENELEC/JTC 21, which mandates its status as a national standard in European countries. This widespread adoption underscores its role in fostering trust in AI technologies and supporting responsible innovation on a global scale. By providing a common language and structured approach for AI risk management, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 helps organizations meet evolving regulatory expectations worldwide, build confidence among stakeholders, and navigate the complex landscape of AI risks and opportunities, ultimately contributing to the sustainable growth and responsible deployment of AI systems internationally.

Implementation Timeline

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 was published on February 6, 2023. It was formally adopted as European Standard EN ISO/IEC 23894:2024 by CEN-CENELEC on February 12, 2024. All member national standards bodies in CEN-CENELEC countries were mandated to publish or endorse it as a national standard by August 2024.

Adoption and Endorsement

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 was published jointly by ISO and IEC through Subcommittee SC 42 of Joint Technical Committee JTC 1 in February 2023. In Europe, CEN-CENELEC/JTC 21 endorsed the text without modification as EN ISO/IEC 23894:2024 in February 2024, and national standards bodies across member states implemented it as a national standard by August 2024.

Sources and References

SourceType
ISO/IEC 23894:2023 - Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Guidance on risk managementofficial
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 - Artificial intelligenceofficial
ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management — Guidelinesofficial
ISO Guide 73:2009 - Risk management — Vocabularyofficial
ISO/IEC 22989:2022 - Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Artificial intelligence concepts and terminologyofficial
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management systemofficial
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)government

Requirements for a company

What an organisation has to do under ISO AI Risk Management Guidance, at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.

Must do

0

Nothing in this category.

Must not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Should do

7
  • Embed risk management considerations into every stage of the AI system lifecycle, from conceptualization through deployment and decommissioning.Organizations developing, deploying, or using AI systems
  • Identify and evaluate AI-specific risk sources, including data bias, model opacity, security vulnerabilities, and emergent adaptive behaviors.Organizations developing or deploying AI systems
  • Integrate AI risk management processes into existing organizational risk management structures aligned with ISO 31000.Organizations implementing AI risk management
  • Establish continuous monitoring and frequent reassessments to track shifting risk exposures and dynamic AI system performance.Organizations operating AI systems in dynamic environments
  • Utilize AI risk management guidance to operationalize risk processes within an AI Management System conforming to ISO/IEC 42001.Organizations implementing an AI Management System
  • Conduct ongoing post-market surveillance and collect user feedback to maintain sustained AI safety, usability, and operational reliability.Organizations deploying AI systems in production
  • +1 more in the table below

Should not do

0

Nothing in this category.

Who must do what

The obligations under ISO AI Risk Management Guidance, most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

#WhoRequirementBy whenWhereSeverity
1Organizations developing, deploying, or using AI systemsEmbed risk management considerations into every stage of the AI system lifecycle, from conceptualization through deployment and decommissioning.
“embedding risk considerations throughout the entire AI system lifecycle, from the initial conceptualization and design phase through data collection, model development, testing, validation, deployment, ongoing operational monitoring, and eventual decommissioning”
—Scope and ApplicationRecommended
2Organizations developing or deploying AI systemsIdentify and evaluate AI-specific risk sources, including data bias, model opacity, security vulnerabilities, and emergent adaptive behaviors.
“outlines processes for identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating AI-specific risks, emphasizing that these risks can emerge at any stage”
—Key ProvisionsRecommended
3Organizations implementing AI risk managementIntegrate AI risk management processes into existing organizational risk management structures aligned with ISO 31000.
“Organizations are encouraged to integrate AI risk management with their broader organizational risk management framework to ensure coherence and efficiency.”
—Implementation FrameworkRecommended
4Organizations operating AI systems in dynamic environmentsEstablish continuous monitoring and frequent reassessments to track shifting risk exposures and dynamic AI system performance.
“AI systems often necessitate more frequent reassessment and continuous risk monitoring, particularly in dynamic environments or when dealing with evolving data patterns.”
—Monitoring and EvaluationRecommended
5Organizations implementing an AI Management SystemUtilize AI risk management guidance to operationalize risk processes within an AI Management System conforming to ISO/IEC 42001.
“ISO/IEC 23894 offers the detailed 'how-to' guidance for managing AI risks within that system.”
—Implementation FrameworkRecommended
6Organizations deploying AI systems in productionConduct ongoing post-market surveillance and collect user feedback to maintain sustained AI safety, usability, and operational reliability.
“gathering feedback on AI performance and usability, and conducting post-market surveillance.”
—Monitoring and EvaluationRecommended
7Organizations developing or deploying complex AI modelsAssess and mitigate AI risks regarding human oversight challenges, transparency limitations, and potential fairness issues.
“transparency and explainability limitations, human oversight and control challenges, environmental impacts, and broader societal and ethical concerns.”
—Key ProvisionsRecommended

© Regulations.AI — created on 12 Jun 2026 using Gemini 2.5 Flash · reviewed against official sources on 9 Sep 2026 using Gemini 3.6 Flash