Chile - AI Use in Government (Oficio No. 711/2023)
MinCiencia instructive on AI use in government
Instructivo del Ministerio de Ciencia sobre uso de IA en el Estado
Chile
RAI-CL-NA-IDMDCXX-2024Non-binding administrative circular issued jointly by the Ministry of Science and the Division of Government Digital (Segpres) establishing recommended guidelines for the design, procurement, deployment and monitoring of AI tools in Chilean public services, emphasizing human-centred design, transparency, data protection and cybersecurity. The circular entered into force on 1 January 2024 and is published as Oficio No. 711/2023 by MinCiencia. View circular (PDF)
Summary
Read full text ↗Plain English
Overview
The instrument is an administrative circular prepared by the Ministry of Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation (MinCiencia) together with the Division of Government Digital (DGD) of the Ministerio Secretaría General de la Presidencia (Segpres). Announced on 14 December 2023 and circulated as Oficio No. 711/2023, it entered into effect on 1 January 2024 and is addressed to the heads of Chilean public services and to named ministerial and agency addressees. It is explicitly presented as a set of recommended "lineamientos" — guidance for public bodies to adopt when they decide to develop, procure or operate tools based on systems of artificial intelligence. The circular frames AI adoption as an opportunity to improve public services while stressing ethics, non‑discrimination and data protection. Primary documentation is available from the Ministry of Science: MinCiencia news and the original PDF circular published by the Ministry: Oficio No. 711/2023 (PDF).
Definitions
The circular uses operational definitions appropriate for administrative guidance: "tools based on systems of intelligence artificial" (tools/systems that produce predictions, recommendations or decisions from input data); "Coordinators of Transformation Digital" (internal focal points in each public body responsible for digital transformation matters); "DGD" (Division of Government Digital); and references to Chilean legal concepts such as "datos personales" (personal data) governed by Law No. 19.628 and subsequent modifications. The document distinguishes generative AI services (text/image/audio) from other algorithmic decision support tools and emphasizes concepts such as transparency, explainability, human‑centred design and proportionality in use. For the authoritative text see the original circular PDF: Oficio No. 711/2023.
Governance and Institutional Framework
The circular assigns a coordinating and monitoring role to the DGD (Segpres) while situating MinCiencia as a policy and technical leader in AI matters for the State. It recommends that each service appoint or use an existing "Coordinator of Transformation Digital" to act as the institutional contact for AI matters and to provide the DGD with requested information. The document was distributed to an extensive list of ministers and senior agency heads (the PDF includes a distribution list that names dozens of ministries and agencies). The instrument therefore creates an inter‑agency supervisory fabric for guidance implementation and positions the DGD to follow up by requesting reports and data. Relevant official sources: the MinCiencia announcement and the circular text itself, accessible at MinCiencia news and Oficio No. 711/2023 (PDF).
Key Focus Areas
The circular organizes guidance into four main categories: (i) AI centred on people, (ii) transparency and explainability, (iii) privacy and data use, and (iv) other measures (capacity building, good practice references and institutional learning). Under "AI centred on people" it foregrounds impact assessment, a rights‑protective approach and explicit prohibitions on arbitrary discrimination in categories protected by the Constitution and law. Under "transparency and explainability" it recommends that agencies inform the public, via adequate channels and clear language, when AI systems are used in service delivery or in decisions that could affect fundamental rights. "Privacy and use of data" requires compliance with data protection law (Law No. 19.628 and its reforms) and specifically cautions against uploading personal or sensitive data to third‑party generative AI platforms that have not been contracted by the state body. The "other measures" section encourages training of public servants and cross‑referencing to practical guides (such as the DGD ethical formulation guide and other public administration best practice documents). The circular cites and requires compliance with existing technical decrees issued by Segpres to strengthen cybersecurity and platform quality (Decrees No. 7 and No. 11 of 2023).
Implementation Framework
Implementation is advised via each entity's Coordinator of Transformation Digital, who must act as the interface with the DGD and respond to information requests. Agencies are advised to: evaluate if AI is the appropriate solution; carry out human‑centred design processes including, where appropriate, public consultations; document data sources and model purposes; avoid use of sensitive personal data in uncontrolled generative models; and comply with Segpres technical norms on security and platform quality. The circular positions MinCiencia and the DGD to develop future guidance and to facilitate compliance, but does not create administrative penalties in the text—the main compliance mechanism is administrative oversight and information requests by the DGD. For implementation text and specific reporting instructions, see the circular: Oficio No. 711/2023 (PDF).
Monitoring and Evaluation
The circular tasks the DGD with follow‑up powers: the DGD may oficiar (issue official requests) to agencies and the Director(a) of Data of the DGD may request information from Coordinators of Transformation Digital. The document sets out channels for delivery of requested information and anticipates periodic reporting that will allow the DGD and MinCiencia to collect empirical evidence about deployments in order to inform future regulatory decisions. The circular therefore functions as an evidence‑gathering instrument as well as guidance, enabling policy evaluation and iterative adjustment of rules or the development of binding instruments if necessary. The published PDF and press announcement describe the DGD's monitoring role: MinCiencia news and Oficio No. 711/2023 (PDF).
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
The circular is presented as recommended guidance and does not itself create new administrative sanctions or criminal penalties. It instructs agencies to comply with existing laws (notably data protection and cybersecurity decrees) that carry their own enforcement regimes. The circular indicates administrative follow‑up via DGD information requests and reserves the possibility of further measures or referrals to competent oversight bodies (for example, the Contraloría General de la República or sectoral supervisors) where statutory infractions or serious risks are identified. In practice, liabilities and appeals would follow existing legal processes under Chilean administrative, data protection and public law frameworks rather than the circular itself. See the circular text for precise wording: Oficio No. 711/2023 (PDF).
Relationship to Other Instruments
The circular explicitly references and requires compliance with existing technical decrees and norms issued by Segpres, notably Decree No. 7 (Norma Técnica de Seguridad de la Información y Ciberseguridad, 2023) and Decree No. 11 (Norma Técnica de Calidad y Funcionamiento de las plataformas electrónicas, 2023). It also situates itself alongside MinCiencia's National AI Policy, the government's draft AI bill and other sectoral regulations (health, justice, electoral processes) that may apply when AI is used in regulated domains. The circular instructs agencies to consult jurisprudence and recommendations of the Consejo para la Transparencia and to align with guides produced by the DGD and other public innovation labs. Official references are included in the PDF: Oficio No. 711/2023.
International Alignment
Although a domestic administrative instrument, the circular cites the importance of aligning Chilean practices with international standards and comparative frameworks. MinCiencia frames Chile as a Latin American leader in AI policy and notes parallels with international efforts such as the EU AI Act's risk‑based approach and global ethical guidance. The circular's emphasis on transparency, data protection and human‑centred design mirrors common international principles and prepares Chilean agencies to integrate future transnational requirements. See MinCiencia commentary: MinCiencia news.
Implementation Timeline
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Publication of circular announced | 2023-12-14 |
| Circular enters into force (effective date) | 2024-01-01 |
| Initial DGD information requests (expected first round) | 2024 Q1–Q2 (agency dependent) |
| Ongoing monitoring and guidance updates | 2024 onward |
Compliance Checklist
| Requirement | Check |
|---|---|
| Has the agency evaluated whether AI is the appropriate solution? | Yes/No |
| Is there a Coordinator of Transformation Digital designated? | Yes/No |
| Has a non‑discrimination assessment been completed? | Yes/No |
| Are citizens informed when AI is used in services/decisions? | Yes/No |
| Is personal and sensitive data protected and not uploaded to uncontrolled generative platforms? | Yes/No |
| Does the deployment comply with Decree No. 7/2023 (cybersecurity) and Decree No. 11/2023 (platform quality)? | Yes/No |
Sources and References
This guideline from Chile's Ministry of Science offers recommendations for how public services should design, procure, deploy, and monitor artificial intelligence tools. It applies to all Chilean public bodies and agencies, including ministries and other government services.
Effective January 1, 2024, the circular, issued jointly by the Ministry of Science (MinCiencia) and the Division of Government Digital (DGD), aims to improve public services while ensuring ethical, non-discriminatory, and data-protected AI use.
Key obligations for public services include: - Designing AI systems with a human-centred approach, assessing potential impacts, and explicitly prohibiting arbitrary discrimination. - Ensuring transparency by clearly informing the public when AI is used in services or decisions that could affect fundamental rights. - Protecting privacy and data by complying with existing data protection law (Law No. 19.628). Crucially, agencies must avoid uploading personal or sensitive data to third-party generative AI platforms that have not been officially contracted. - Adhering to technical decrees on cybersecurity (Decree No. 7/2023) and platform quality (Decree No. 11/2023).
While this circular is a set of recommended guidelines and does not introduce new penalties, the DGD plays a significant monitoring role. It can issue official requests for information from agencies and their designated "Coordinators of Digital Transformation." Non-compliance with existing laws referenced in the circular, such as data protection or cybersecurity, would still carry their own legal consequences. A practical pitfall for teams is the explicit warning against using uncontracted third-party generative AI for sensitive data, which could easily be overlooked. The DGD's information requests mean agencies will need to demonstrate their adherence, even without direct penalties from the circular itself.
Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.
What you must do — compliance checklist
0 / 15 marked completePlain-English obligations under Chile - AI Use in Government (Oficio No. 711/2023). Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
- #1CriticalKey Focus Areas⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...explicit prohibitions on arbitrary discrimination in categories protected by the Constitution and law.”
- #2CriticalKey Focus Areas⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Public services using AI systems.
“'Privacy and use of data' requires compliance with data protection law (Law No. 19.628 and its reforms)...”
- #3CriticalKey Focus Areas⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...requires compliance with existing technical decrees... (Decrees No. 7 and No. 11 of 2023).”
- #4CriticalKey Focus Areas⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...requires compliance with existing technical decrees... (Decrees No. 7 and No. 11 of 2023).”
- #5CriticalRelationship to Other Instruments⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI in regulated domains.
“...other sectoral regulations (health, justice, electoral processes) that may apply when AI is used in regulated domains.”
- #6ImportantKey Focus Areas⏰ Before using generative AI platforms
Applies to: Public services using generative AI platforms.
“...specifically cautions against uploading personal or sensitive data to third‑party generative AI platforms that have not been contracted by the state body.”
- #7ImportantGovernance and Institutional Framework⏰ Upon DGD request
Applies to: Coordinators of Transformation Digital in public services.
“...to provide the DGD with requested information.”
- #8ImportantKey Focus Areas⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...it foregrounds impact assessment, a rights‑protective approach...”
- #9ImportantImplementation Framework⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...document data sources and model purposes...”
- #10RecommendedGovernance and Institutional Framework
Applies to: Each Chilean public service.
“It recommends that each service appoint or use an existing 'Coordinator of Transformation Digital'...”
- #11RecommendedKey Focus Areas⏰ Upon deployment
Applies to: Public services using AI in service delivery or decisions affecting rights.
“...it recommends that agencies inform the public... when AI systems are used...”
- #12RecommendedImplementation Framework⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services considering AI deployment.
“Agencies are advised to: evaluate if AI is the appropriate solution...”
- #13RecommendedImplementation Framework⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...carry out human‑centred design processes including, where appropriate, public consultations...”
- #14RecommendedKey Focus Areas⏰ Ongoing
Applies to: Public services.
“...encourages training of public servants and cross‑referencing to practical guides...”
- #15RecommendedRelationship to Other Instruments⏰ Before deployment
Applies to: Public services deploying AI systems.
“...instructs agencies to consult jurisprudence and recommendations of the Consejo para la Transparencia...”
Related Regulations
Oficio Circular N° 711 — Lineamientos para el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en el sector público (Guidelines for use of AI tools in the public sector) (<a href="https://actualidadjuridica.doe.cl/lineamientos-para-el-uso-de-herramientas-de-inteligencia-artificial-en-el-sector-publico/?utm_source=openai">actualidadjuridica.doe.cl</a>)
Chile97% similar
Decreto (No. 12) Aprueba actualización de la Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (Update of the National AI Policy) (<a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/821913774/Politica-Nacional-de-Inteligencia-Artificial?utm_source=openai">scribd.com</a>)
Chile93% similar
Plan de Acción para la Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (Action Plan of the National AI Policy)
Chile93% similar
Resolución Exenta N° 372 — Recomendaciones del Consejo para la Transparencia sobre transparencia algorítmica (Recommendations on algorithmic transparency)
Chile92% similar
Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (National Policy on Artificial Intelligence) (<a href="https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=1169399&utm_source=openai">bcn.cl</a>)
Chile92% similar
© Regulations.AI — created on 13-Jun-2026