Chile - National AI Policy (Decreto Supremo N°20)
National Policy on Artificial Intelligence
Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (National Policy on Artificial Intelligence) (<a href="https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=1169399&utm_source=openai">bcn.cl</a>)
Chile
RAI-CL-NA-PNDIAXX-2021Chile - National AI Policy (Decreto Supremo N°20) is Adopted in Chile as of 10 Sep 2026, according to www.minciencia.gob.cl.
PolicyGovernance and OversightRisk ManagementAccountability and DocumentationChile's Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (approved by Decreto Supremo N°20 in 2021 and updated in 2025) is a 10-year strategic policy to promote ethical, inclusive and sustainable development and adoption of AI. It sets three strategic axes (enabling factors; development and adoption; governance, ethics and socio‑economic impact), a Plan of Action with prioritized initiatives, and guidance on data, talent, infrastructure, governance and international cooperation.
Summary
Full article
Read full text ↗Overview
The Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (approved by Decreto Supremo N°20/2021 and updated by decree in 2025) is Chile's strategic 10‑year roadmap for AI (2021–2031). It aims to promote research, innovation, capacity-building and responsible adoption of AI across public and private sectors, guided by principles of human‑centered design, respect for rights, sustainability and inclusiveness. The policy sets three strategic axes — enabling factors; development and adoption; governance, ethics and socio‑economic impacts — and is accompanied by a Plan of Action listing prioritized actions and cross‑sector initiatives. The Ministry of Science coordinates implementation and public materials (policy text, Plan of Action and progress reports) are published on the Ministry's AI page. MinCiencia - AI
Definitions
The Policy provides working definitions to orient public discussion: "Artificial Intelligence" is defined broadly (drawing on Montreal and OECD formulations) as computational systems that perform tasks that ordinarily require intelligence — prediction, recommendation or decision-making — and that may operate with varying degrees of autonomy. The document distinguishes AI techniques (machine learning, deep learning, symbolic AI), datasets, models, systems, operators, developers and deployers, and clarifies the Policy's scope as covering research, development, deployment and public use, while recognizing the need for sector‑specific analyses for regulated domains (e.g., health, finance).
Governance and Institutional Framework
The Policy assigns coordination responsibility to the Ministry of Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation and envisages an interministerial governance model involving relevant ministries, public agencies and stakeholders. In practice, governance measures include (a) an interministerial Committee for oversight; (b) the creation/strengthening of a national AI centre (e.g., CENIA); (c) multi‑actor working groups for specific issues (ethics, data governance, skills); and (d) public consultation mechanisms. The Policy encourages institutional capacity-building in government to adopt AI responsibly and proposes integrating AI criteria into public procurement and program evaluation. For official resources and downloads, see the ministry's portal at MinCiencia AI area and the approving decree at BCN.
Key Focus Areas
The Policy’s actions concentrate on three interlocking priorities. First, enabling factors: development of talent (education, doctoral scholarships, professional retraining), data and digital infrastructure (data governance, data sharing, data centers, 5G connectivity), and R&D funding. Second, development and adoption: supporting AI deployment in public services, stimulating private sector innovation, promoting start‑ups and university‑industry collaboration, and ensuring interoperability and standards. Third, governance, ethics and socio‑economic impact: promoting human‑centered AI, rights protection, inclusion, non‑discrimination, transparency and accountability; commissioning risk mapping and guidance for sectoral high‑risk uses; fostering public participation and awareness; and coordinating international cooperation. The Plan of Action organizes concrete initiatives (education reform, algorithmic transparency pilots, funding programs) and allocates responsibilities across ministries and agencies.
Implementation Framework
Implementation relies on a mix of policy levers: public investment in infrastructure and scholarships, regulatory guidance and pilots in public services, voluntary standards and codes, public procurement conditions, and interagency coordination. The Policy endorses a risk‑based approach (identifying high‑impact/high‑risk systems for special treatment) and recommends impact assessments, documentation standards (model cards, data statements), and technical evaluation and auditing in critical uses. It also promotes partnerships (public-private-academic) and international engagement to leverage global standards and funding opportunities. Implementation tools and downloadable resources are published by the Ministry: policy downloads.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The Policy establishes progress monitoring through the Plan of Action and periodic reporting. It proposes indicators across talent (trained professionals), infrastructure (data centers, connectivity), research output (publications, doctoral programs), public adoption (number of AI projects in government), and governance (number of regulatory/ethical instruments developed). The Ministry is expected to publish progress reports (for example, the 2024 Results Report) and to run participatory evaluations to update priorities — a process that culminated in the 2025 formal update.
Penalties, Liability, and Appeals
As a strategic policy, the document itself does not establish new criminal sanctions or specific administrative fines for AI use; rather it sets expectations and coordination mechanisms. The Policy recommends impact assessments, transparency and accountability mechanisms and signals that sectoral regulation (with enforcement and liability rules) may follow where necessary. For concrete enforcement measures and penalties, regulators will rely on existing sectoral legal frameworks (health, consumer protection, data protection) or on future specific regulation inspired by the Policy's risk‑based categorization.
Relationship to Other Instruments
The Policy is explicitly connected to Chile's broader science, technology and innovation strategy and to existing legal instruments (e.g., the law creating the Ministry of Science, Decreto Supremo N°4/2020 on national CTCI policy). It complements sectoral regulation and international obligations on data protection and human rights. The Policy also anticipates and informs future legislative proposals on AI and intersects with sectoral oversight authorities (health regulators, financial supervisors, data protection agencies).
International Alignment
The Chilean Policy aligns with international references (OECD AI Principles, UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI) and seeks active participation in global fora. It proposes cooperation in research networks, alignment with best practices for risk‑based regulation and harmonization with regional initiatives in Latin America. Updates in 2024–2025 emphasize international collaboration and adherence to emerging global governance frameworks.
Implementation Timeline
| Phase | Key milestones | Dates |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption | Decree approval and publication | Decree N°20 (20 Sep 2021); Published 2021-12-03 |
| Rollout (short term) | Plan of Action launches, scholarships, pilot projects | 2021–2023 |
| Update | Governance/Ethics axis consultation and formal update | Consultations 2023–2024; Update published 2025-01-28 |
| Medium term | Infrastructure, doctoral programs, national centre activities | 2022–2026 |
| Long term | Evaluation, regulatory refinement, 10‑year review | 2027–2031 |
Sources and References
| Source | Type |
|---|---|
| Decreto Supremo N°20/2021 — Aprueba Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (BCN) | Primary Source |
| Ministry of Science — Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (policy downloads, Plan of Action, reports) | Primary Source |
| Política Nacional de IA (updated PDF on MinCiencia / Google Drive) | Primary Source |
| VLex — Decreto N°20 (Diario Oficial text) | Primary Source (official publication reproduction) |
Requirements for a company
What an organisation has to do under Chile - National AI Policy (Decreto Supremo N°20), at a glance. Not legal advice — the table below gives the provision and deadline for each item.
Not yet in force (Adopted). These requirements apply once the instrument takes effect and may change before then.
Must do
0Nothing in this category.
Must not do
0Nothing in this category.
Should do
7- Perform AI risk mapping and impact assessments for high-impact systems.Public agencies and major deployers of AI systems.
- Adopt documentation standards like model cards and data statements for AI systems.Developers and providers of AI systems.
- Integrate AI criteria into public procurement processes for AI-related purchases.Ministries and public procurement units.
- Conduct technical evaluation and auditing for AI systems in critical uses.Deployers of AI systems in critical uses.
- Build institutional capacity within government to adopt AI responsibly.Government entities.
- Promote human-centered AI, rights protection, inclusion, non-discrimination, transparency, and accountability.All actors involved in AI development and deployment.
- +1 more in the table below
Should not do
0Nothing in this category.
Who must do what
The obligations under Chile - National AI Policy (Decreto Supremo N°20), most serious first. Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.
| # | Who | Requirement | By when | Where | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public agencies and major deployers of AI systems. | Perform AI risk mapping and impact assessments for high-impact systems. “recommends impact assessments... in critical uses.” | — | — | Recommended |
| 2 | Developers and providers of AI systems. | Adopt documentation standards like model cards and data statements for AI systems. “recommends... documentation standards (model cards, data statements)” | — | — | Recommended |
| 3 | Ministries and public procurement units. | Integrate AI criteria into public procurement processes for AI-related purchases. “proposes integrating AI criteria into public procurement” | — | — | Recommended |
| 4 | Deployers of AI systems in critical uses. | Conduct technical evaluation and auditing for AI systems in critical uses. “recommends... technical evaluation and auditing in critical uses.” | — | — | Recommended |
| 5 | Government entities. | Build institutional capacity within government to adopt AI responsibly. “The Policy encourages institutional capacity-building in government to adopt AI responsibly” | — | — | Recommended |
| 6 | All actors involved in AI development and deployment. | Promote human-centered AI, rights protection, inclusion, non-discrimination, transparency, and accountability. “promoting human‑centered AI, rights protection, inclusion, non‑discrimination, transparency and accountability” | — | — | Recommended |
| 7 | Relevant ministries and public agencies. | Participate in the interministerial governance model for AI oversight. “envisages an interministerial governance model involving relevant ministries, public agencies” | — | — | Recommended |
Related Regulations
More AI regulation in Chile
AI regulation in Chile: full overview
- Chile - Algorithmic Transparency Recommendations (372/2024)
- Chile AI Regulation Overview
- Chile - Consumer Protection in AI (Resolución Exenta N°33/2022)
- Chile - Prevention Models Regulation (662/2025)
- Chile - Qualification of Vital Operators (285/2025)
- Chile - Essential Services Registration (N°1/2025)
- Chile - Cybersecurity Framework Law (21.663)
- Chile - Criminal Code Amendment (Boletín 15935-07)
© Regulations.AI · updated on 20 Sep 2026 · reviewed against official sources on 10 Sep 2026