Ecuador - AI Ethics Code (2025)

Code of Ethics for the Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Superintendence of Economic Competition

Código de Ética para el Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial de la Superintendencia de Competencia Económica

Ecuador

RAI-EC-NA-CDTPEXX-2025
Effective: June 12, 2025
In Force(In Force)
GuidelineGovernance and OversightTransparency and DisclosureFundamental Rights
Export PDF

Ecuador's SCE adopted an AI Code of Ethics in 2025, guiding responsible public sector AI use with principles like human judgment, transparency, and data protection.

Overview

The Código de Ética para el Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial (AI Code of Ethics) represents a landmark initiative by the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) of Ecuador, formally adopted and presented on June 12, 2025, in Quito. This document serves as a foundational ethical framework, specifically designed to guide the responsible and human-centered integration and deployment of Artificial Intelligence within the public sector, with a particular focus on the operations and mandates of the SCE. Its introduction positions Ecuador as a pioneer in Latin America for establishing a comprehensive ethical framework for AI in public administration, aiming to balance technological innovation with the protection of citizens' rights and dignity.

The Code is not merely a set of aspirational statements but a practical guide intended to ensure that all AI implementations within the SCE adhere to strict ethical principles. It addresses critical concerns such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, transparency, and human oversight, which are paramount in the context of public service delivery. By setting clear directives, the SCE aims to foster public trust in AI technologies, promote equitable outcomes, and prevent potential harms associated with automated decision-making processes. This proactive approach underscores Ecuador's commitment to navigating the complexities of the digital transformation responsibly, aligning with global best practices for ethical AI governance.

Definitions

The Código de Ética for the Use of Artificial Intelligence, while primarily a set of principles, implicitly defines several key concepts crucial for its understanding and application. 'Artificial Intelligence (AI)' refers to systems designed to process data, learn, reason, and make decisions, often automating tasks that typically require human intelligence. The Code emphasizes that these systems, within the SCE's context, are to be considered 'technical support' tools, explicitly stating they 'will not substitute the analysis, decision, nor responsibility of public servants,' thereby defining AI as an assistive, rather than a fully autonomous, agent in critical public functions.

Furthermore, 'Ethical Use' is defined through a set of ten core principles, which collectively articulate the expected conduct and outcomes when AI is employed. This includes 'Primacía del juicio humano' (Primacy of human judgment), highlighting the imperative for human oversight and ultimate responsibility. 'Transparencia y explicabilidad' (Transparency and explainability) mandates clear communication about AI's function and results, along with source citation, thereby defining transparency as a fundamental requirement for algorithmic accountability. 'Protección de datos personales' (Personal data protection) is also implicitly defined by requiring adherence to privacy, confidentiality, and security through anonymization, pseudonymization, and informed consent. These definitions collectively establish a benchmark for responsible AI development and deployment within the public sector.

Governance and Institutional Framework

The governance structure for the implementation and oversight of the AI Code of Ethics is primarily centered within the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) itself. The SCE, as the adopting institution, is responsible for integrating the Code's directives into all processes involving AI. The Code's application is mandatory across all administrative units and contractual modalities within the SCE, ensuring a consistent and institution-wide commitment to ethical AI practices. This internal governance model is designed to embed ethical considerations at every stage of AI deployment, from initial conceptualization to ongoing operation and evaluation.

A critical component of this framework is the establishment of a dedicated Committee of Ethics of AI within the SCE. This specialized body is tasked with supervising the application of the Code and ensuring its practical compliance. Its responsibilities include overseeing strict supervision mechanisms, facilitating continuous training in digital ethics for public personnel, and conducting periodic audits of AI systems. This institutional arrangement underscores the SCE's commitment to not only adopting ethical principles but also creating robust mechanisms for their enforcement and continuous improvement, positioning the SCE as a leader in ethical digital governance within the Ecuadorian public sector.

Key Focus Areas

The AI Code of Ethics by the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) is structured around ten fundamental principles, each addressing a critical aspect of ethical AI deployment. A primary focus is on the 'Primacía del juicio humano' (Primacy of human judgment), emphasizing that AI tools are strictly for technical support and must never replace the analytical capacity, decision-making, or ultimate responsibility of public servants. This principle ensures that human oversight remains central to all AI-driven processes, particularly in areas affecting citizens' rights and public interest.

Another significant area of focus is 'Transparencia y explicabilidad' (Transparency and explainability), which mandates that any administrative action utilizing AI must be clearly identified, with its function and results explained in an understandable manner, and the use of AI cited as a source. This aims to demystify AI operations and build public trust. Furthermore, 'Protección de datos personales' (Personal data protection) is a cornerstone, requiring strict adherence to privacy, confidentiality, and security through measures like anonymization, pseudonymization, and informed consent, in line with existing data protection laws. The Code also prioritizes 'No discriminación y equidad algorítmica' (Non-discrimination and algorithmic equity), prohibiting the use of AI in ways that perpetuate biases or discriminatory effects, and forbidding profiling without verifiable criteria, thereby safeguarding fundamental rights.

Implementation Framework

The implementation framework for the AI Code of Ethics within the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) is designed for comprehensive integration across all institutional activities. It mandates that the principles outlined in the Code are to be incorporated into every process that involves the use of Artificial Intelligence. This includes internal administrative procedures, data analysis, decision-support systems, and any public-facing applications of AI. The framework emphasizes a 'compliance by design' approach, encouraging proactive consideration of ethical implications from the initial stages of AI system development and procurement.

To facilitate this, the SCE has committed to providing continuous training for its personnel on digital ethics and data protection. This educational component is crucial for fostering a culture of ethical AI use and ensuring that all employees understand their responsibilities in upholding the Code's principles. Additionally, the implementation framework is supported by a 'Guide for Auditing AI Tools,' which provides practical mechanisms for verifying adherence to the Code. This guide, presented in October 2025, institutionalizes the control mechanisms necessary to ensure that the ethical directives are not only understood but also consistently applied and verifiable in practice, thereby strengthening the overall integrity and accountability of AI use within the SCE.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation of the AI Code of Ethics are integral to its effectiveness and continuous improvement within the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE). The primary oversight body for this function is the Committee of Ethics of AI, a specialized internal committee established by the SCE. This committee is responsible for actively supervising the application of the Code's principles and ensuring their practical fulfillment across all AI-related activities within the institution. Its mandate includes conducting regular assessments to identify areas of compliance and potential gaps, thereby providing a feedback loop for refinement.

The monitoring mechanisms involve strict supervision protocols, which include periodic audits of AI systems and their outputs. These audits are designed to verify adherence to principles such as transparency, non-discrimination, and data protection, ensuring that AI tools operate as intended and do not produce unintended or harmful consequences. Furthermore, the Code suggests public policies that foster citizen participation in the evaluation of new technologies, indicating an outward-looking approach to accountability. This multi-faceted monitoring and evaluation strategy aims to maintain the integrity of AI use within the SCE, adapt to evolving technological landscapes, and continuously reinforce public trust in ethical AI governance.

Penalties, Liability, and Appeals

While the Código de Ética para el Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial primarily functions as a guideline for ethical conduct within the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE), it is underpinned by existing legal frameworks that address non-compliance and liability. The Decálogo Ético explicitly states that its principles are of 'strict compliance, conforme al régimen disciplinario previsto' (in accordance with the foreseen disciplinary regime), implying that violations by public servants could lead to internal disciplinary actions. This connects the ethical guidelines to the broader public service regulations in Ecuador, where breaches of conduct can result in administrative sanctions.

For issues related to data protection, the Code aligns with the Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP), which establishes specific penalties for data privacy infringements. In cases where AI systems lead to discriminatory outcomes or violations of fundamental rights, the general legal framework of Ecuador, including constitutional provisions, would provide avenues for redress and appeals. Although the Code itself does not detail specific monetary penalties or judicial appeal processes, it operates within a legal ecosystem where such mechanisms exist to ensure accountability and provide recourse for affected individuals, thereby reinforcing the imperative for responsible AI development and deployment.

Relationship to Other Instruments

The Código de Ética para el Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial by the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) is not an isolated document but is deeply integrated within a broader national and international regulatory landscape. It explicitly draws its authority and alignment from 'principios constitucionales que rigen la administración pública' (constitutional principles governing public administration) and 'el marco normativo sobre transformación digital, protección de datos personales y competencia económica' (the normative framework on digital transformation, personal data protection, and economic competition). This foundational link ensures that the Code operates in harmony with Ecuador's supreme law and other relevant statutes.

Significantly, the Code is also presented as being 'plenamente alineados con la Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial' (fully aligned with the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence), adopted by Member States in 2021. This international alignment underscores Ecuador's commitment to global ethical standards for AI. Furthermore, the implementation of the Code is supported by adherence to the 'Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)' and the 'Esquema Gubernamental de Seguridad de la Información (EGSI),' ensuring robust data privacy and cybersecurity practices. This multi-layered relationship with national laws and international recommendations strengthens the Code's legitimacy and effectiveness.

International Alignment

The Código de Ética para el Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial by the Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) demonstrates a strong commitment to international best practices and ethical standards in AI governance. A cornerstone of this alignment is its explicit adherence to the 'Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial' (UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence), which was adopted by UNESCO Member States in 2021. This alignment signifies Ecuador's dedication to a human-centered approach to AI, promoting principles such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and respect for human rights in the development and deployment of AI systems.

By embracing the UNESCO Recommendation, Ecuador positions itself within a global movement towards responsible AI. The Recommendation provides a comprehensive framework for ethical AI, covering areas like data governance, environmental sustainability, gender equality, and international cooperation. The SCE's Code, by reflecting these overarching principles, contributes to a more harmonized and globally coherent approach to AI ethics. This international alignment not only enhances the credibility of Ecuador's AI governance efforts but also facilitates cross-border collaboration and the exchange of best practices in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

Implementation Timeline

MilestoneDateNotes
Official Presentation of AI Code of Ethics2025-06-12Presented by Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) in Quito.
Publication of Decálogo Ético para el Uso de la IA2025-07-16Formal adoption and publication of the ten ethical principles by the SCE.
Presentation of Guide for Auditing AI Tools2025-10-23Institutionalization of mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Code of Ethics.
Ongoing Training and Implementation2025-06-12 onwardsContinuous integration of ethical guidelines and training for public personnel within the SCE.

Compliance Checklist

CheckRequired Action
Human OversightEnsure AI tools are used as technical support and do not replace human analysis, decision, or responsibility.
Transparency & ExplainabilityIdentify AI use in administrative actions, explain its function and results, and cite AI as a source.
Data ProtectionGuarantee privacy, confidentiality, and security of information through anonymization, pseudonymization, and informed consent, adhering to LOPDP.
Non-DiscriminationUtilize AI to avoid biases or discriminatory effects and prohibit profiling without verifiable criteria.
AccountabilityEstablish clear lines of responsibility for AI system outcomes and ensure decisions are validated by responsible public servants.
Ethical PurposeEnsure AI contributes to the SCE's competencies with transparency, objectivity, and in the public interest.
Supervision & ControlImplement mechanisms for human supervision and control, ensuring no automated result is definitive without institutional review.
Security & ResilienceApply robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and data.
Continuous TrainingProvide ongoing training for personnel on digital ethics and responsible AI use.
Prohibition of MisuseStrictly prohibit the use of AI for purposes contrary to human dignity, fundamental rights, or public interest.

Sources and References

SourceType
Ecuador adopta primer Código de Ética de Inteligencia Artificial (IA) - UNESCOOfficial Government / International Body
Ecuador adopta su primer Código de Ética de Inteligencia Artificial en el sector público - HLB Ecuador (citing official sources)Official Government / International Body
Decálogo Ético para el Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) - Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE)Official Government
Superintendencia pone en práctica Código de Ética para el uso de IA - Expreso (citing official sources)News (citing official sources, for additional context on Guide)
Superintendencia de Compañías, Valores y Seguros (SCVS) - Official WebsiteOfficial Government
Consulta pública de la Propuesta de Estrategia para el fomento del desarrollo y uso ético y responsable de la inteligencia artificial en el Ecuador - MINTELOfficial Government
Plain English

Ecuador's Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) has implemented a new AI Code of Ethics, a foundational framework designed to ensure the responsible and human-centered use of artificial intelligence within its public sector operations. This code, which took effect on June 12, 2025, applies to all SCE administrative units and personnel, guiding how AI tools are integrated and deployed in public service.

The core of the code emphasizes several critical obligations for teams developing or using AI. Firstly, it mandates the "primacy of human judgment," meaning AI is strictly a technical support tool and must never replace the analysis, decision, or ultimate responsibility of public servants. Secondly, "transparency and explainability" are paramount: any administrative action using AI must be clearly identified, its function and results explained, and the AI's use cited as a source. Thirdly, robust "personal data protection" is required, demanding strict adherence to privacy, confidentiality, and security through measures like anonymization, pseudonymization, and informed consent, aligning with Ecuador's data protection laws. Finally, the code prohibits "discrimination and algorithmic inequity," forbidding AI use that perpetuates biases or discriminatory effects, or profiling without verifiable criteria.

While primarily a guideline, the code carries weight: violations by public servants can lead to internal disciplinary actions under existing public service regulations. Furthermore, any breaches of data privacy are subject to specific penalties outlined in Ecuador's Organic Law on Personal Data Protection. The SCE has established a dedicated AI Ethics Committee to oversee compliance, conduct audits, and provide continuous training, ensuring these principles are actively enforced. A crucial practical takeaway is that, regardless of AI sophistication, human oversight and accountability remain non-negotiable, with AI serving only as an assistive agent in critical public functions.

Plain-English rewrite by Regulations.ai — not legal advice. Verify against the official text.

What you must do — compliance checklist

0 / 12 marked complete

Plain-English obligations under Ecuador - AI Ethics Code (2025). Not legal advice — verify against the official text before relying on it.

  1. #1CriticalPrimacía del juicio humanoJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE using AI tools.

    AI tools are strictly for technical support and must never replace the analytical capacity, decision-making, or ultimate responsibility of public servants.
  2. #2CriticalProhibition of MisuseJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE.

    Strictly prohibit the use of AI for purposes contrary to human dignity, fundamental rights, or public interest.
  3. #3CriticalTransparencia y explicabilidadJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE using AI in administrative actions.

    any administrative action utilizing AI must be clearly identified, with its function and results explained in an understandable manner, and the use of AI cited as a source.
  4. #4CriticalProtección de datos personalesJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE using AI systems processing personal data.

    requiring strict adherence to privacy, confidentiality, and security through measures like anonymization, pseudonymization, and informed consent, in line with existing data protection laws.
  5. #5CriticalNo discriminación y equidad algorítmicaJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE developing or deploying AI systems.

    prohibiting the use of AI in ways that perpetuate biases or discriminatory effects, and forbidding profiling without verifiable criteria.
  6. #6CriticalGovernance and Institutional FrameworkJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) as an institution.

    establishment of a dedicated Committee of Ethics of AI within the SCE. This specialized body is tasked with supervising the application of the Code and ensuring its practical compliance.
  7. #7ImportantAccountabilityJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE responsible for AI system deployment and outcomes.

    Establish clear lines of responsibility for AI system outcomes and ensure decisions are validated by responsible public servants.
  8. #8ImportantEthical PurposeJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE developing or deploying AI systems.

    Ensure AI contributes to the SCE's competencies with transparency, objectivity, and in the public interest.
  9. #9ImportantSupervision & ControlJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE managing AI systems.

    Implement mechanisms for human supervision and control, ensuring no automated result is definitive without institutional review.
  10. #10ImportantSecurity & ResilienceJun 12, 2025

    Applies to: Public servants within the SCE managing AI systems and data.

    Apply robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and data.
  11. #11ImportantImplementation FrameworkInvalid Date

    Applies to: Superintendencia de Competencia Económica (SCE) as an institution.

    The SCE has committed to providing continuous training for its personnel on digital ethics and data protection.
  12. #12ImportantMonitoring and EvaluationOct 23, 2025

    Applies to: Committee of Ethics of AI within the SCE.

    The monitoring mechanisms involve strict supervision protocols, which include periodic audits of AI systems and their outputs.

© Regulations.AI — created on 06-Jan-2026 using Gemini 2.5 Flash