Which countries set fines for breaking AI rules?
Fines, penalties and sanctions an instrument itself sets for breaching its AI obligations.
9 of 21 reviewed jurisdictions address this in at least one tracked instrument. Updated 2026-09-26.
Each answer cites the instrument it rests on; open it for the provision and the full analysis. Whether a rule is binding law, a bill or guidance comes from the instrument's type and status, not from wording.
“Not found” means none of the instruments we track for that jurisdiction addresses the topic. It is not a finding that no such rule exists.
Yes — binding law in force (8)
Argentina
Yes — binding law in forceViolations of the decree and annex trigger applicable disciplinary sanctions after due-process proceedings.
- Argentina - Santa Fe - AI Adoption Protocol (2726/2025), Artículo 7° — Decree, In Force
- Argentina - Virtual Assistant Implementation (1486/2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- Argentina - AI Regulation Framework (2505-D-2023), Artículo 14.f — Bill, Proposed
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
2 of 4 regions address this
- Buenos AiresNot found in the instruments we track
- JujuyNot found in the instruments we track
- Río NegroGuidance or policy only
Improper use by external auxiliaries must be referred to professional bodies, alongside available judicial sanctions.
- Argentina - Río Negro - AI Good Practices Protocol (RAI-AR-RN-PDBPPXX-2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
- San JuanPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Unauthorized or improper AI use may result in disciplinary action against judicial staff.
- Argentina - San Juan - AI Judicial Protocol (2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
China
Yes — binding law in forceViolations may lead to warnings, public criticism, orders to correct, or suspension of services.
- China - Anthropomorphic AI Services Regulation, 第二十九条 — Regulation, In Force
- China - Generative AI Services Management, 第二十一条 — Regulation, In Force
- China - Algorithmic Recommendation Regulation (Order No. 9), 第三十一条 — Regulation, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 4 regions address this
- BeijingNot found in the instruments we track
- ShanghaiNot found in the instruments we track
- ShenzhenNot found in the instruments we track
- ZhejiangNot found in the instruments we track
Kazakhstan
Yes — binding law in forceArticle 641-1 imposes graded administrative fines for AI transparency and risk-management breaches.
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulatory Amendments (232-VIII), Article 641-1 — Act, In Force
- Kazakhstan Digital Code, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, Adopted (from 2026-07-01)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Singapore
Yes — binding law in forceA person convicted of the offence is subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both.
- Singapore - Online Advertising Integrity (2024), section 42LA(2) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
South Korea
Yes — binding law in forceThe Act provides for administrative fines up to 30 million Korean Won and corrective orders including service suspension.
- South Korea AI Trust Framework Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- South Korea - Intelligent Robot Promotion Act (2008) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- South Korea - AI Industry Promotion (AIPTRXX/2022), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 1 regions address this
- SeoulNot found in the instruments we track
United Kingdom
Yes — binding law in forceIt establishes criminal penalties, including a maximum five-year prison sentence, for CSA image-generator offences.
- UK Crime and Policing Bill 2025, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- ScotlandNot found in the instruments we track
United States
Yes — binding law in forceFederal LLM contracts must provide for vendors to bear decommissioning costs after termination for noncompliance.
- US Federal Government Woke AI Prevention Order, Sec. 4(b)(i) — Decree, In Force
- US TAKE IT DOWN Act 2025, Sec. 2(a), Communications Act §223(h)(4)(A) — Act, In Force
- US National Security AI Memo, Sec. 3(b) — Decree, In Force
- and 6 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
37 of 51 states address this
- AlabamaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations are criminally punishable as a Class A misdemeanor, escalating to a Class D felony for later violations.
- United States - Alabama - Deepfake Regulation (HB 172), Implementation Framework — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- AlaskaNot found in the instruments we track
- ArizonaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
A violation is criminally classified as a class 1 misdemeanor, with enhanced felony classifications in specified circumstances.
- United States - Arizona - Deepfake Prohibition (SB 1359), E — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArkansasNot found in the instruments we track
- CaliforniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Large frontier developers may face civil penalties up to $1 million per violation, recoverable only by the Attorney General.
- United States - California - AI Transparency Act (SB 53), Section 22757.15(a) — Act, In Force
- California Kids Online Safety Act, Section 1798.99.35(a) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - AI Child Abuse Material (AB 1831), Section 311.2(b) — Act, In Force
- and 6 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
- ColoradoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
A hearing officer may impose administrative civil penalties for violations involving undisclosed or improperly disclosed deepfakes.
- United States - Colorado - Synthetic Media Disclosure (HB 24-1147) — Act, In Force
- Colorado Psychotherapy AI Restrictions Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Colorado Chatbot Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ConnecticutPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI companion safety violations can result in civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day per violation.
- Connecticut AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- DelawarePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It establishes misdemeanor and felony penalties and allows candidates to seek civil injunctions.
- United States - Delaware - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 316) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- FloridaNot found in the instruments we track
- GeorgiaAdopted — not yet in force
The Act authorizes civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation.
- Georgia AI Chatbot Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- HawaiiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The attorney general may seek civil penalties of $1,000 per violation, capped at $1 million per operator.
- Hawaii AI Disclosure and Safety Act, §481B-__, subsection (g)(2)(B) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IdahoProposed
Violations involving explicit synthetic media are classified as felony offenses, with enhanced penalties in specified cases.
- Idaho Synthetic Media Voyeurism Act, Section 18-6606 — Bill, In Force
- Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IllinoisPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations are subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.
- Illinois AI in Therapy Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Illinois AI Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, Adopted (from 2027-01-01)
- Illinois AI Healthcare Downcoding Bill, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Awaiting Entry (from 2028-01-01)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IndianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The act provides civil penalties for its fabricated-media disclaimer requirement.
- United States - Indiana - Media Alteration Disclosure (Public Law 81/2024), Existing Statutes and Recent Legislation table (2024 Indiana — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IowaNot found in the instruments we track
- KansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI-related intimate-depiction offenses are subject to felony classifications and criminal penalties.
- Kansas AI Deepfake and Child Exploitation Prevention Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Kansas AI Child Exploitation Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- KentuckyNot found in the instruments we track
- LouisianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Licensing boards may impose administrative discipline, including fines, for failure to make the AI disclosure.
- Louisiana AI Medical Transcription Disclosure, R.S. 37:22.1(B) — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Political Call Disclosure, R.S. 42:1132(D) — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Deepfake Crime Bill — Bill, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MaineNot found in the instruments we track
- MarylandNot found in the instruments we track
- MassachusettsNot found in the instruments we track
- MichiganPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations carry misdemeanor or repeat-offense felony penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
- United States - Michigan - Deceptive Media Prohibition (HB 5144), MCL 168.932f — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - Intimate Deepfakes Act (HB 4047-4048), Sec. 8(2) — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - AI in Elections (HB 5141-5145), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
- MinnesotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It imposes criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines up to $10,000, for violating the deep-fake dissemination prohibition.
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfake Liability (HF 1370), § 609.771, Subd. 3(a)(1) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfakes Regulation (HF 4772), Minn. Stat. § 609.771, subd. 3 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MississippiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It provides criminal fines and imprisonment for violations involving wrongful dissemination of digitizations.
- United States - Mississippi - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 2577), Section 1(3)(a) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MissouriPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations carry civil penalties of $10,000 for a first violation and $20,000 for later violations.
- Missouri AI Therapy Chatbot Ban, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-11
- MontanaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Commissioner may impose an administrative fine up to $500 for an initial violation, with repeat cases referred for prosecution.
- United States - Montana - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 25), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- NebraskaNot found in the instruments we track
- NevadaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act imposes civil penalties for non-compliance with its disclosure requirements.
- United States - Nevada - Deepfakes Regulation (AB 73), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- New HampshirePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Civil damages for violations must be at least $1,000 per incident, alongside criminal and injunctive remedies.
- New Hampshire AI Child Safety Law, RSA 507 — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1432), RSA 638 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- New JerseyPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Tax-credit applicants' chief executive officers must certify factual representations under penalty of perjury.
- United States - New Jersey - AI Development Act (P.L.2020, c.156), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- New MexicoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Willful and knowing violations of the deceptive-media prohibition are crimes, escalating from a misdemeanor to a fourth-degree felony.
- United States - New Mexico - Deepfake Regulation (HB 182), Section 1-19-26.8(D)(1) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- New YorkPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Non-compliance carries civil penalties of $500 for a first violation and $500 to $1,500 for subsequent violations.
- United States - New York - Employment Decision Tools (LL144), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- United States - New York - Deepfakes Regulation (Chapter 56/2024), Election Law § 14-107-a — Act, In Force
- New York RAISE Act Amendments — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- North CarolinaNot found in the instruments we track
- North DakotaNot found in the instruments we track
- OhioProposed
Platforms that fail to remove prohibited content after notice may face civil penalties of up to $1,000 daily.
- United States - Ohio - AI Watermark Requirements (SB 217), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- OklahomaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Convictions for covered offenses, including AI-generated material, may result in imprisonment and fines up to $25,000.
- Oklahoma AI Child Sexual Abuse Material Law — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
- OregonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
A court must impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each violation.
- United States - Oregon - Synthetic Media Disclosure (SB 1571), ORS Chapter 260 — Act, In Force
- United States - Oregon - AI in Campaigns (SB 1571), SECTION 1(4) — Act, In Force
- Oregon AI Companion Chatbot Safety Law, Section 2(1)(a) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- PennsylvaniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Digital forgery convictions carry specified misdemeanor and felony fines and imprisonment.
- Puerto RicoNot found in the instruments we track
- Rhode IslandPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Civil actions may obtain injunctions, damages, and reasonable attorneys' fees for violations.
- United States - Rhode Island - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 5872), Title 17, Chapter 30 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- South CarolinaProposed
Violations are criminally punishable by imprisonment, fines, or both, with enhanced penalties for repeat offenses.
- United States - South Carolina - Deepfake Media Regulation (HB 3517), Section 7-25-230(E) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violators commit a Class 1 misdemeanor and face civil liability for damages, costs, and attorney fees.
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1074), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 164), Section 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TennesseePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Noncompliance is a Class C misdemeanor and may result in civil damages and equitable relief.
- Tennessee Deepfake Political Ads Law, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Tennessee Bans AI Mental Health Professional Impersonation — Act, In Force
- United States - Tennessee - Voice and Image Protection (2024), Section 6, T.C.A. § 47-25-1105(a) — Act, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TexasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act provides for civil penalties and permits state agencies to impose monetary sanctions.
- United States - Texas - AI Governance Act (HB 149), Sec. 552.106 — Act, In Force
- United States - Texas - Deepfakes in Elections (SB 751), Section 255.004 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- UtahPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Division director may impose administrative fines up to $2,500 for each violation.
- United States - Utah - AI Mental Health Regulation (HB 452), Section 13-72a-204(3)(a) — Act, In Force
- Utah Classroom AI and Tech Rules, Section 53G-7-228(8)(b) — Act, In Force
- United States - Utah - AI in Political Communications (SB 131), Section 20A-11-1104(6)(a) — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- VermontNot found in the instruments we track
- VirginiaProposed
The Attorney General may pursue civil penalties of up to $50,000 for each violation.
- Virginia AI Chatbot Minor Protection Act, Governance and Institutional Framework — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WashingtonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations involving covered depictions are classified as felonies, with punishment prescribed under the criminal code.
- Washington AI Child Exploitation Law, Sec. 3, RCW 9.68A.050(1)(b) — Act, In Force
- Washington Deepfake Personality Rights Act, Sec. 4(2) — Act, In Force
- United States - Washington - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 5152), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- West VirginiaNot found in the instruments we track
- WisconsinPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Intentional violations of the AI-content disclosure requirements are subject to forfeitures up to $1,000 per violation.
- United States - Wisconsin - Deepfakes Regulation (Act 123), s. 11.1303 (2m) (f) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WyomingPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Convictions for unlawful dissemination, including computer-generated intimate images, may result in a fine or imprisonment.
- Wyoming Nonconsensual Intimate Image Act, W.S. 6-4-306 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
Vietnam
Yes — binding law in forceThe law establishes monetary administrative sanctions and remedial measures for non-compliance.
- Vietnam - Digital Technology Law (71/2025/QH15) — Act, In Force
- Vietnam AI Act 2025, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
0 of 1 regions address this
- Ho Chi Minh CityNot found in the instruments we track
Proposed (7)
Brazil
ProposedExcessive-risk AI development, supply or use must result in at least a fine and may suspend legal entities' activities.
- Brazil - National AI Regulation (2.338/2023), Capítulo VIII, Seção II, § 4º — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
Chile
ProposedThe bill provides administrative fines and corrective sanctions for noncompliance.
- Chile - AI and Robotics Regulation (Boletín 15869-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Systems Regulation (Boletín 16821-19), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - Identity Usurpation via AI (Boletín 16112-07), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
India
ProposedNon-compliance can result in financial penalties up to ₹5 crore, alongside licensing and criminal consequences.
- India AI Ethics and Accountability Bill, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Proposed
- India - AI Development Recommendations, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-09
1 of 4 regions address this
- KarnatakaNot found in the instruments we track
- MaharashtraGuidance or policy only
Misuse of farmer data can result in blacklisting from government contracts and legal action.
- India - Maharashtra - AI in Agriculture (2025-29), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- Tamil NaduNot found in the instruments we track
- TelanganaNot found in the instruments we track
Indonesia
ProposedThe draft provides for administrative fines for AI-related non-compliance.
- Indonesia - National AI Regulation, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Decree, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-08
Mexico
ProposedThe bill imposes imprisonment and fines for prohibited improper uses of generative-AI tools.
- Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025), Article 211 Bis 10 — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Proposed
- Mexico - AI Research Consortium, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Saudi Arabia
ProposedThe draft imposes administrative sanctions, including fines, suspension and revocation, for non-compliance with hub obligations.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Turkey
ProposedThe bill provides administrative fines and possible temporary activity suspension for noncompliance.
- Turkey - AI Law Amendments (Esas No. 2/3358), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Turkey - AI Regulation Bill (2/2234), Article 6 — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
Guidance or policy only (1)
United Arab Emirates
Guidance or policy onlyNo national rule found; covered by regional law.
1 of 2 regions address this
- Abu DhabiNot found in the instruments we track
- DubaiGuidance or policy only
Entities may not display the seal without verification or after expiry or revocation, with administrative fines for violations.
- United Arab Emirates - Dubai - AI Certification Framework, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
- United Arab Emirates - Dubai - AI Regulatory Sandbox, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Not found in the instruments we track (4)
Australia
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 7 regions address this
- Australian Capital TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- New South WalesNot found in the instruments we track
- Northern TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- QueenslandNot found in the instruments we track
- TasmaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- VictoriaNot found in the instruments we track
- Western AustraliaNot found in the instruments we track
Canada
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 4 regions address this
- AlbertaNot found in the instruments we track
- British ColumbiaNot found in the instruments we track
- OntarioNot found in the instruments we track
- QuebecNot found in the instruments we track
Japan
Not found in the instruments we trackSwitzerland
Not found in the instruments we track
International organisations (1)
European Union
Yes — binding law in forceMember States must establish and implement penalties and other enforcement measures for operator infringements.
- Digital Omnibus on AI, Article 99 amendment — Regulation, In Force
- EU AI Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force (Amended)
- EU AI Act Enforcement, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- and 4 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-11
Not yet reviewed for this topic (65)
We track instruments for these jurisdictions but have not yet classified them for this topic. This is not a finding that they have no such rule.
Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan