Which countries set fines for breaking AI rules?
Fines, penalties and sanctions an instrument itself sets for breaching its AI obligations.
22 of 109 reviewed jurisdictions address this in at least one tracked instrument. Updated 2026-10-04.
Each answer cites the instrument it rests on; open it for the provision and the full analysis. Whether a rule is binding law, a bill or guidance comes from the instrument's type and status, not from wording.
“Not found” means none of the instruments we track for that jurisdiction addresses the topic. It is not a finding that no such rule exists.
Yes — binding law in force (20)
Argentina
Yes — binding law in forceViolations of the decree and annex trigger applicable disciplinary sanctions after due-process proceedings.
- Argentina - Santa Fe - AI Adoption Protocol (2726/2025), Artículo 7° — Decree, In Force
- Buenos Aires Generative AI Guidelines, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Decree, In Force
- Argentina - AI Regulation Framework (2505-D-2023), Artículo 14.f — Bill, Proposed
- and 2 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
2 of 4 regions address this
- Buenos AiresNot found in the instruments we track
- JujuyNot found in the instruments we track
- Río NegroGuidance or policy only
The amended framework permits tribunals to apply sanctions for improper AI use or protocol non-compliance.
- Argentina - Río Negro - AI Good Practices Protocol (RAI-AR-RN-PDBPPXX-2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
- San JuanPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Unauthorized or improper AI use may result in disciplinary action against judicial staff.
- Argentina - San Juan - AI Judicial Protocol (2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
China
Yes — binding law in forceViolations may lead to warnings, public criticism, orders to correct, or suspension of services.
- China - Anthropomorphic AI Services Regulation, 第二十九条 — Regulation, In Force
- China AI Content Labeling Rules, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- China - Generative AI Services Management, 第二十一条 — Regulation, In Force
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 4 regions address this
- BeijingNot found in the instruments we track
- ShanghaiNot found in the instruments we track
- ShenzhenNot found in the instruments we track
- ZhejiangNot found in the instruments we track
Finland
Yes — binding law in forceIt imposes administrative fines for prohibited practices and non-compliance with high-risk AI requirements.
- Finland AI Act Implementation Law, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Finland - AI Regulation Implementation (HE 46/2025), HE 46/2025 — Perustelut §4.2 — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 1 regions address this
- HelsinkiNot found in the instruments we track
Germany
Yes — binding law in forceThe Act establishes administrative fines of up to 50,000 euros for specified AI Act violations.
- Germany AI Act Implementation Law, § 15 Absatz 3 — Act, In Force
- Germany - Protection Against Deepfakes (222/24), B. Lösung — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
1 of 3 regions address this
- Baden-WürttembergNot found in the instruments we track
- BavariaNot found in the instruments we track
- North Rhine-WestphaliaGuidance or policy only
State-funded projects must meet ethical and technical standards; noncompliance can require grant repayment.
- Germany - North Rhine-Westphalia - AI Strategy 2.0, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Hungary
Yes — binding law in forceThe Decree sets HUF administrative-fine ceilings and requires payment to the market surveillance authority within 30 days.
- Hungary - AI Regulation Implementation (344/2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Decree, In Force
- Hungary - EU AI Regulation Implementation (LXXV/2025) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Iran
Yes — binding law in forceOrganizations that fail to meet mandatory standards or data-protection rules may receive warnings, fines, or license suspension.
- Iran National AI Organization, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Decree, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Ireland
Yes — binding law in forceAn adjudicator must determine administrative fines for infringements of the EU AI Act.
- Ireland AI Regulation Act, section 105 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Italy
Yes — binding law in forceIt imposes imprisonment for harmful non-consensual distribution of deceptive AI-altered content.
- Italy - AI Regulation (n.132/2025), Art. 26, comma 1, lettera c) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 2 regions address this
- Emilia-RomagnaNot found in the instruments we track
- LombardyNot found in the instruments we track
Kazakhstan
Yes — binding law in forceArticle 641-1 imposes graded administrative fines for AI transparency and risk-management breaches.
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulatory Amendments (232-VIII), Article 641-1 — Act, In Force
- Kazakhstan Digital Code, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, Adopted (from 2026-07-01)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Latvia
Yes — binding law in forceIt establishes criminal sanctions, including imprisonment of up to five years, for deepfake and automated-system election offences.
- Latvia - Criminalising Deepfake Use (90.1/2024), Article 90.1 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Lithuania
Yes — binding law in forceThe RRT can impose administrative fines and corrective measures for non-compliance.
- Lithuania - AI Act Implementation (XV-106), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Malta
Yes — binding law in forceThe instrument empowers MDIA to impose administrative fines for breaches and daily penalties for ongoing infringements.
- Malta - AI Regulations (226/2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- Malta - AI Commissioner Designation (227/2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- Malta - AI Certification Programme, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Peru
Yes — binding law in forceIt imposes imprisonment and day-fines for child pornography involving AI technologies or AI-generated content.
- Peru - AI Use as Aggravating Circumstance (32314/2025), Artículo 129-M — Act, In Force
- Peru - AI Regulation Bill (07033/2023), Título IV, numeral 6 — Bill, Under Review
- Peru - AI Education Integration (7659/2023), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-10
Singapore
Yes — binding law in forceA person convicted of the offence is subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both.
- Singapore - Online Advertising Integrity (2024), section 42LA(2) — Act, In Force
- Singapore - National AI Programme, Compliance Checklist — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Slovakia
Yes — binding law in forceThe text states that national legislation mirrors EU AI Act fines for non-compliance, including high-risk and transparency breaches.
- Slovakia AI Conformity Assessment Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Slovakia - AI Governance Bill (LP/2025/401), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Slovakia - AI State Administration Act (RAI-SK-NA-DOSAFXX-2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Slovenia
Yes — binding law in forceThe Act provides domestic procedures for authorities to impose administrative fines and corrective measures.
- Slovenia - AI Regulation Implementation (85/2025) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
South Korea
Yes — binding law in forceThe Act provides for administrative fines up to 30 million Korean Won for violations.
- South Korea AI Trust Framework Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- South Korea - Intelligent Robot Promotion Act (2008), Market governance, surveillance and enforcement — Act, In Force (Amended)
- South Korea - AI Industry Promotion (AIPTRXX/2022), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 1 regions address this
- SeoulNot found in the instruments we track
United Kingdom
Yes — binding law in forceThe AI-model offence carries a maximum custodial penalty of five years.
- UK Crime and Policing Bill 2025, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- DWP AI Security Policy for Government Use, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- ScotlandNot found in the instruments we track
United States
Yes — binding law in forceFederal LLM contracts must provide for vendors to bear decommissioning costs after termination for noncompliance.
- US Federal Government Woke AI Prevention Order, Sec. 4(b)(i) — Decree, In Force
- US TAKE IT DOWN Act 2025, Sec. 2(a), Communications Act §223(h)(4)(A) — Act, In Force
- US National Security AI Memo, Sec. 3(b) — Decree, In Force
- and 6 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
36 of 51 states address this
- AlabamaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations are criminally punishable as a Class A misdemeanor, escalating to a Class D felony for later violations.
- United States - Alabama - Deepfake Regulation (HB 172), Implementation Framework — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- AlaskaNot found in the instruments we track
- ArizonaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
A violation is criminally classified as a class 1 misdemeanor, with enhanced felony classifications in specified circumstances.
- United States - Arizona - Deepfake Prohibition (SB 1359), E — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArkansasNot found in the instruments we track
- CaliforniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Large frontier developers may face civil penalties up to $1 million per violation, recoverable only by the Attorney General.
- United States - California - AI Transparency Act (SB 53), Section 22757.15(a) — Act, In Force
- California Kids Online Safety Act, Section 1798.99.35(a) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - AI Child Abuse Material (AB 1831), Section 311.2(b) — Act, In Force
- and 4 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
- ColoradoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
An appointed hearing officer may impose civil penalties for violations involving undisclosed or improperly disclosed deepfakes.
- United States - Colorado - Synthetic Media Disclosure (HB 24-1147), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Colorado Psychotherapy AI Restrictions Act — Act, In Force
- Colorado Chatbot Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ConnecticutPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI companion safety violations can result in civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day per violation.
- Connecticut AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- DelawarePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It establishes misdemeanor and felony penalties and allows candidates to seek civil injunctions.
- United States - Delaware - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 316) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- FloridaNot found in the instruments we track
- GeorgiaAdopted — not yet in force
The Attorney General may impose civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation.
- Georgia AI Chatbot Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- HawaiiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The attorney general may seek a civil penalty of $1,000 per violation, capped at $1,000,000 per operator.
- Hawaii AI Disclosure Safety Act, §481B-__, subsection (g)(2)(B) — Act, In Force
- Hawaii Deepfake Regulation Act 2026, § -4(b)(2) — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IdahoProposed
Violations involving explicit synthetic media are classified as felony offenses, with enhanced penalties in specified cases.
- Idaho Synthetic Media Voyeurism Act, Section 18-6606 — Bill, In Force
- Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IllinoisPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations can result in civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.
- Illinois AI in Therapy Act — Act, In Force
- United States - Illinois - AI Employment Regulation (HB 3773), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Illinois AI Safety Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, Adopted (from 2027-01-01)
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IndianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The act provides civil penalties for its fabricated-media disclaimer requirement.
- United States - Indiana - Media Alteration Disclosure (Public Law 81/2024), Existing Statutes and Recent Legislation table (2024 Indiana — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IowaNot found in the instruments we track
- KansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI-related intimate-depiction offenses are subject to felony classifications and criminal penalties.
- Kansas AI Deepfake and Child Exploitation Prevention Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Kansas AI Child Exploitation Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- KentuckyNot found in the instruments we track
- LouisianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Licensing boards may impose administrative discipline, including fines, for failure to make the AI disclosure.
- Louisiana AI Medical Transcription Disclosure, R.S. 37:22.1(B) — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Political Call Disclosure, R.S. 42:1132(D) — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Deepfake Crime Bill — Bill, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MainePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Attorney General may seek civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each violation.
- United States - Maine - AI Transparency Act, Title 10, §1500-DD — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- MarylandNot found in the instruments we track
- MassachusettsNot found in the instruments we track
- MichiganPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations carry misdemeanor or felony imprisonment and fines, and may be subject to permanent injunctive relief.
- United States - Michigan - Deceptive Media Prohibition (HB 5144), Michigan Election Law §168.932f — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - Intimate Deepfakes Act (HB 4047-4048), Sec. 8(2) — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - AI in Elections (HB 5141-5145), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
- MinnesotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It imposes criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines up to $10,000, for violating the deep-fake dissemination prohibition.
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfake Liability (HF 1370), § 609.771, Subd. 3(a)(1) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfakes Regulation (HF 4772), Minn. Stat. § 609.771, subd. 3 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MississippiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Convicted persons may receive imprisonment, fines up to $10,000, or both.
- United States - Mississippi - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 2577), Section 1(3)(a) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MissouriPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations carry civil penalties of $10,000 for a first violation and $20,000 for later violations.
- Missouri AI Therapy Chatbot Ban, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-11
- MontanaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Commissioner may impose an administrative fine up to $500 for an initial violation, with repeat cases referred for prosecution.
- United States - Montana - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 25), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- NebraskaNot found in the instruments we track
- NevadaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act imposes civil penalties for noncompliance with its disclosure requirements.
- United States - Nevada - Deepfakes Regulation (AB 73) — Act, In Force
- New HampshirePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It provides criminal liability, civil enforcement, and minimum damages of $1,000 per violation.
- New Hampshire AI Child Safety Law, RSA 507 — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1432), RSA 638 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- New JerseyNot found in the instruments we track
- New MexicoNot found in the instruments we track
- New YorkPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Non-compliance carries civil penalties of $500 for a first violation and $500 to $1,500 for subsequent violations.
- United States - New York - Employment Decision Tools (LL144), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- United States - New York - Deepfakes Regulation (Chapter 56/2024), Election Law § 14-107-a — Act, In Force
- New York RAISE Act Amendments — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- North CarolinaNot found in the instruments we track
- North DakotaNot found in the instruments we track
- OhioProposed
Platforms that fail to remove prohibited content after notice may face civil penalties of up to $1,000 daily.
- United States - Ohio - AI Watermark Requirements (SB 217), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- OklahomaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Convictions for covered offenses, including AI-generated material, may result in imprisonment and fines up to $25,000.
- Oklahoma AI Child Sexual Abuse Material Law — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
- OregonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
A court must impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each violation.
- United States - Oregon - Synthetic Media Disclosure (SB 1571), ORS Chapter 260 — Act, In Force
- United States - Oregon - AI in Campaigns (SB 1571), SECTION 1(4) — Act, In Force
- Oregon AI Companion Chatbot Safety Law, Section 2(1)(a) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- PennsylvaniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Digital forgery convictions carry specified misdemeanor and felony fines and imprisonment.
- Puerto RicoNot found in the instruments we track
- Rhode IslandPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Civil actions may obtain injunctions, damages, and reasonable attorneys' fees for violations.
- United States - Rhode Island - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 5872), Title 17, Chapter 30 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- South CarolinaProposed
Violations are criminally punishable by imprisonment, fines, or both, with enhanced penalties for repeat offenses.
- United States - South Carolina - Deepfake Media Regulation (HB 3517), Section 7-25-230(E) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violators commit a Class 1 misdemeanor and face civil liability for damages, costs, and attorney fees.
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1074), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 164), Section 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TennesseePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Noncompliance is a Class C misdemeanor and may result in civil damages and equitable relief.
- Tennessee Deepfake Political Ads Law, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- Tennessee Bans AI Mental Health Professional Impersonation — Act, In Force
- United States - Tennessee - Voice and Image Protection (2024), Section 6, T.C.A. § 47-25-1105(a) — Act, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TexasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Violations can result in civil penalties, injunctions, and agency sanctions.
- United States - Texas - AI Governance Act (HB 149), Sec. 552.105 — Act, In Force
- United States - Texas - Deepfakes in Elections (SB 751), Section 255.004 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- UtahPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Division director may impose administrative fines up to $2,500 for each violation.
- United States - Utah - AI Mental Health Regulation (HB 452), 13-72a-204(3)(a) — Act, In Force
- United States - Utah - AI in Political Communications (SB 131), Section 20A-11-1104(6)(a) — Act, In Force
- United States - Utah - AI Consumer Protection (SB 226), Section 13-75-105(4)(a) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- VermontNot found in the instruments we track
- VirginiaProposed
The Attorney General may pursue civil penalties of up to $50,000 for each violation.
- Virginia AI Chatbot Minor Protection Act, Governance and Institutional Framework — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WashingtonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Infringers are subject to a $3,000 civil penalty, damages, profits, and additional noneconomic damages for forged digital likenesses.
- Washington Deepfake Personality Rights Act, Sec. 4(2) — Act, In Force
- United States - Washington - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 5152), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- West VirginiaNot found in the instruments we track
- WisconsinPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Intentional violations of the AI-content disclosure requirements are subject to forfeitures up to $1,000 per violation.
- United States - Wisconsin - Deepfakes Regulation (Act 123), s. 11.1303 (2m) (f) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WyomingPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It imposes felony penalties, including fines, for unlawful AI-system development or distribution for child pornography.
- Wyoming AI Child Exploitation and Deepfake Law, 6-4-308(d) — Act, In Force
- Wyoming Nonconsensual Intimate Image Act, W.S. 6-4-306 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
Vietnam
Yes — binding law in forceThe law establishes monetary administrative sanctions and remedial measures for non-compliance.
- Vietnam - Digital Technology Law (71/2025/QH15) — Act, In Force
- Vietnam AI Act 2025, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
0 of 1 regions address this
- Ho Chi Minh CityNot found in the instruments we track
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law (1)
Russia
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) lawNo national rule found; covered by regional law.
1 of 2 regions address this
- MoscowPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
A participant's violation of this Law and related acts is grounds for exclusion from the experimental-regime register.
- Russia - Moscow - AI Development Experiment (123-FZ/2020), Статья 5, часть 8, пункт 5 — Act, In Force (Amended)
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TatarstanNot found in the instruments we track
Proposed (24)
Bahrain
ProposedThe AI Unit may impose administrative penalties and fines on non-compliant entities.
- Bahrain - AI Regulation Law (2024) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
Brazil
ProposedExcessive-risk AI development, supply or use must result in at least a fine and may suspend legal entities' activities.
- Brazil - National AI Regulation (2.338/2023), Capítulo VIII, Seção II, § 4º — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
Bulgaria
ProposedThe draft provides administrative sanctions, including fines and orders to suspend or withdraw non-conforming AI systems.
- Bulgaria - AI Regulation Draft (RAI-BG-NA-DAPBPXX-2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Draft
- Bulgaria - AI in Education Strategy, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Chile
ProposedRegulators may impose administrative fines and corrective sanctions for non-compliant deployments.
- Chile - AI and Robotics Regulation (Boletín 15869-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Systems Regulation (Boletín 16821-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - Criminal Code Amendment (Boletín 15935-07), Articles 468 and 469 — Bill, Under Review
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
Colombia
ProposedThe bill contemplates administrative fines, corrective orders and temporary suspension for noncompliance.
- Colombia - Ethical AI Law Proposal (PL 005/2024C), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Stalled
- Colombia - AI Regulation Bill (C200/2023) — Bill, Stalled
- Colombia - AI Regulation Framework (Senate 442/25), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Stalled
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Costa Rica
ProposedThe bill contemplates administrative fines and other sanctions for regulatory violations.
- Costa Rica - AI Regulation Bill, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
Czech Republic
ProposedThe draft establishes warnings, remedial orders, fines, suspensions and publication for infringements.
- Czech Republic - AI Implementation Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ecuador
ProposedThe draft establishes administrative penalties for non-compliance, including fines scaled by severity and organizational capacity.
- Ecuador - AI Regulation and Promotion (2024) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
India
ProposedNon-compliance can result in financial penalties up to ₹5 crore, alongside licensing and criminal consequences.
- India AI Ethics and Accountability Bill, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Proposed
- India - AI Development Recommendations, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-09
1 of 4 regions address this
- KarnatakaNot found in the instruments we track
- MaharashtraGuidance or policy only
Misuse of farmer data can lead to blacklisting from government contracts and legal action.
- India - Maharashtra - AI in Agriculture (2025-29), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- Tamil NaduNot found in the instruments we track
- TelanganaNot found in the instruments we track
Indonesia
ProposedThe draft establishes administrative fines and other enforcement measures for non-compliance.
- Indonesia - National AI Regulation, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Decree, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-08
Kenya
ProposedOperating an unregistered robotics or AI society or association is an offence punishable by fine or imprisonment.
- Kenya - Robotics and AI Society Bill (2023), Section 21(1) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
Luxembourg
ProposedIt establishes administrative fines for prohibited practices, high-risk obligations and misleading information.
- Luxembourg - AI Act Implementation (Bill No. 8476) — Act, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Mexico
ProposedAI-enabled offenders would be subject to existing criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
- Mexico - Criminalizing Non-consensual AI Content (2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025), Article 211 Bis 10 (proposed) — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025), Article 994 of Ley Federal del Trabajo (proposed amendment) — Bill, Proposed
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-07
Morocco
ProposedThe framework provides for fines for violations including failures to comply with AI risk-management requirements.
- Morocco - Digital Services Framework (2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Draft
- Morocco - National AI Governance Bill (2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
0 of 1 regions address this
- Casablanca-SettatNot found in the instruments we track
Nigeria
ProposedThe Bill provides administrative fines and other sanctions for non-compliant AI systems and actors.
- Nigeria - AI Technology Control (HB 942), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Nigeria - AI Code of Practice (2025), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, Draft
- Nigeria - National AI Policy, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-09
Norway
ProposedThe proposal provides administrative penalties and coercive fines for non-compliance.
- Norway - AI Regulation (2026), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Philippines
ProposedCreators and distributors that fail to make required disclosures face fines up to PHP 5 million.
- Philippines - AI Regulation for Elections (HB 10567) — Bill, Under Review
- Philippines - AI Labor Protection (HB 9448), Governance and Institutional Framework — Bill, Under Review
- Philippines - AI National Roadmap, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted (from 2029-12-31)
Status verified 2026-09-08
Poland
ProposedThe draft provides for administrative fines for infringements and corrective enforcement measures.
- Poland - AI Systems Regulation (DAISPXX/2024) — Bill, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Romania
ProposedThe draft provides administrative fines and corrective measures for non-compliance.
- Romania - AI Legal Framework (B154/2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Romania - Responsible Technology Use (PL-x 471/2023) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Saudi Arabia
ProposedThe draft imposes administrative sanctions, including fines, suspension and revocation, for non-compliance with hub obligations.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Spain
ProposedThe bill incorporates a sanctioning regime, including fines for prohibited systems and serious infringements involving high-risk AI.
- Spain AI Governance Bill, Prácticas prohibidas de la IA — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 3 regions address this
- AsturiasNot found in the instruments we track
- CataloniaNot found in the instruments we track
- GaliciaNot found in the instruments we track
Thailand
ProposedETDA may impose corrective orders, operational conditions, suspension, or revocation for non-compliance.
- Thailand - AI Innovation Promotion Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Draft
- Thailand - AI Business Operations (2022), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Decree, Draft
- Thailand - AI Innovation Testing Center, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, Draft
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Turkey
ProposedThe bill provides administrative fines and possible temporary activity suspension for noncompliance.
- Turkey - AI Law Amendments (Esas No. 2/3358), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Bill, Under Review
- Turkey - AI Regulation Bill (2/2234), Article 6 — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
Uzbekistan
ProposedThe draft establishes administrative liability and penalties for AI-related violations, including unlawful AI personal-data processing.
- Uzbekistan - AI Regulation (2025) — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Guidance or policy only (6)
Austria
Guidance or policy onlyFunding recipients may face recovery, suspension, or termination for non-compliance with contractual obligations.
- Austria - AI for Climate Action, Key design features — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-06
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Bangladesh
Guidance or policy onlyThe draft recommends administrative sanctions, including fines, for non-compliance.
- Bangladesh - National AI Policy (2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Malaysia
Guidance or policy onlyBreaches of programme rules can result in suspension, removal, revocation of access, or withdrawal of support.
- Malaysia - National AI Sandbox Pilot, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
- Malaysia - AI Consortium Initiative, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-05-10)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Netherlands
Guidance or policy onlyGrant-condition breaches can result in withheld tranches, fund recovery, suspension, termination, or legal remedies.
- Netherlands - AI Investment Programme, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 1 regions address this
- AmsterdamNot found in the instruments we track
Sweden
Guidance or policy onlyThe proposed regime requires payment of administrative sanction fees for infringements.
- Sweden - AI Regulation Adjustments (SOU 2025:101), Compliance Checklist — Policy, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
United Arab Emirates
Guidance or policy onlyNo national rule found; covered by regional law.
1 of 2 regions address this
- Abu DhabiNot found in the instruments we track
- DubaiGuidance or policy only
Unauthorized or expired use of the AI Seal is forbidden and can result in administrative fines.
- United Arab Emirates - Dubai - AI Certification Framework, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Not found in the instruments we track (34)
Australia
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 7 regions address this
- Australian Capital TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- New South WalesNot found in the instruments we track
- Northern TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- QueenslandNot found in the instruments we track
- TasmaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- VictoriaNot found in the instruments we track
- Western AustraliaNot found in the instruments we track
Belgium
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Canada
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 4 regions address this
- AlbertaNot found in the instruments we track
- British ColumbiaNot found in the instruments we track
- OntarioNot found in the instruments we track
- QuebecNot found in the instruments we track
Côte d'Ivoire
Not found in the instruments we trackCroatia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Cyprus
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Denmark
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Egypt
Not found in the instruments we trackEstonia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ethiopia
Not found in the instruments we trackFrance
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ghana
Not found in the instruments we trackGreece
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Hong Kong
Not found in the instruments we trackIceland
Not found in the instruments we trackIraq
Not found in the instruments we trackIsrael
Not found in the instruments we trackJapan
Not found in the instruments we trackLebanon
Not found in the instruments we trackMaldives
Not found in the instruments we trackNew Zealand
Not found in the instruments we trackPakistan
Not found in the instruments we trackPanama
Not found in the instruments we trackPortugal
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Qatar
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- DohaNot found in the instruments we track
Rwanda
Not found in the instruments we trackSenegal
Not found in the instruments we trackSerbia
Not found in the instruments we trackSouth Africa
Not found in the instruments we trackSwitzerland
Not found in the instruments we trackTaiwan
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- KaohsiungNot found in the instruments we track
Tunisia
Not found in the instruments we trackUkraine
Not found in the instruments we trackUruguay
Not found in the instruments we track
International organisations (24)
African Union
Not found in the instruments we trackAPEC
Not found in the instruments we trackASEAN
Not found in the instruments we trackBRICS
Not found in the instruments we trackCouncil of Europe
Not found in the instruments we trackEuropean Union
Yes — binding law in forceMember States must establish and implement penalties and other enforcement measures for operator infringements.
- Digital Omnibus on AI, Article 99 amendment — Regulation, In Force
- EU AI Act, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force (Amended)
- EU AI Act Enforcement, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
- and 4 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-11
G7
Not found in the instruments we trackGPAI
Not found in the instruments we trackIAEA
Not found in the instruments we trackICAO
Not found in the instruments we trackIEEE
Not found in the instruments we trackILO
Not found in the instruments we trackInternational
Not found in the instruments we trackInterpol
Not found in the instruments we trackISO
Not found in the instruments we trackITU
Not found in the instruments we trackNATO
Not found in the instruments we trackOAS
Not found in the instruments we trackOECD
Not found in the instruments we trackUNESCO
Not found in the instruments we trackUnited Nations
Not found in the instruments we trackWHO
Not found in the instruments we trackWorld Bank
Not found in the instruments we trackWorld Economic Forum
Not found in the instruments we track