Which countries ban certain AI practices?
Where the law forbids specific AI systems or uses, such as social scoring, manipulative techniques, real-time biometric identification or harmful deepfakes.
15 of 109 reviewed jurisdictions address this in at least one tracked instrument. Updated 2026-10-04.
Each answer cites the instrument it rests on; open it for the provision and the full analysis. Whether a rule is binding law, a bill or guidance comes from the instrument's type and status, not from wording.
“Not found” means none of the instruments we track for that jurisdiction addresses the topic. It is not a finding that no such rule exists.
Yes — binding law in force (14)
Brazil
Yes — binding law in forceIt prohibits the Judiciary from developing or using AI solutions that pose excessive risks.
- Brazil - AI Governance in Judiciary (615/2025), Art. 10 — Regulation, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
China
Yes — binding law in forceIt forbids emotional manipulation, algorithmic manipulation and inducement of unreasonable user decisions.
- China - Anthropomorphic AI Services Regulation, 第七条第(六)项 — Regulation, In Force
- China - Algorithmic Recommendation Regulation (Order No. 9), 第八条 — Regulation, In Force
- China - Network Data Security Management (Decree No. 790), 第四十六条 — Regulation, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 4 regions address this
- BeijingNot found in the instruments we track
- ShanghaiNot found in the instruments we track
- ShenzhenNot found in the instruments we track
- ZhejiangNot found in the instruments we track
Finland
Yes — binding law in forceIt prohibits subliminal manipulation, exploitation of vulnerabilities, and public-authority social scoring.
- Finland AI Act Implementation Law, Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 1 regions address this
- HelsinkiNot found in the instruments we track
Hungary
Yes — binding law in forceIt forbids deploying or marketing AI systems that engage in prohibited unacceptable practices.
- Hungary - EU AI Regulation Implementation (LXXV/2025) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Italy
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalizes harmful non-consensual dissemination of AI-falsified or altered images, videos or voices.
- Italy - AI Regulation (n.132/2025), Art. 26, comma 1, lettera c) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 2 regions address this
- Emilia-RomagnaNot found in the instruments we track
- LombardyNot found in the instruments we track
Kazakhstan
Yes — binding law in forceThe law prohibits creating and operating AI with specified manipulative, exploitative, social-scoring, biometric and emotion-recognition functions.
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulation (2025), Статья 17, пункт 3 — Act, In Force (Amended)
- Kazakhstan Digital Code, Key Focus Areas — Act, Adopted (from 2026-07-01)
- Kazakhstan AI Ethics Code, Key Focus Areas and Prohibitions — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Latvia
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalises false, discrediting election deepfakes and automated systems used to obstruct democratic participation.
- Latvia - Criminalising Deepfake Use (90.1/2024), Article 90.1 — Act, In Force
- Latvia - AI Use in Campaigning (2024), Article 18(6) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Malta
Yes — binding law in forceIt bars deployment of real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces without Magistrate authorisation.
- Malta - AI Commissioner Designation (227/2025), Implementation Framework — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Peru
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminally prohibits using AI-generated or deepfake content for child pornography.
- Peru - AI Use as Aggravating Circumstance (32314/2025), Artículo 129-M — Act, In Force
- Peru - AI Regulation Bill (07033/2023), Título IV, numeral 6 — Bill, Under Review
- Peru - AI Education Integration (7659/2023), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Philippines
Yes — binding law in forceIt prohibits creating and disseminating deepfakes, cheapfakes and soft fakes for election disinformation or misinformation.
- Philippines - AI Campaign Content Prohibition (11064/2024), Article V, Section 1(3) — Regulation, In Force
- Philippines - AI Development Regulation (HB 7396) — Bill, Under Review
- Philippines - AI Regulation for Elections (HB 10567) — Bill, Under Review
- and 1 more
Singapore
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalises realistic false candidate representations in online election advertising made wholly or partly through digital means.
- Singapore - Online Advertising Integrity (2024), section 42LA(1) — Act, In Force
- Singapore - Generative AI Use in Courts (Registrar's Circular No. 1/2024), Core obligations — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Taiwan
Yes — binding law in forceThe text directs that AI applications infringing rights, social order, or national security must not be deployed.
- Taiwan AI Basic Act — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
1 of 1 regions address this
- KaohsiungGuidance or policy only
Authorities must avoid AI uses infringing fundamental rights or harming social order, security, or the environment.
- Taiwan - Kaohsiung - Smart Lighthouse AI Program, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
United Kingdom
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalises making, possessing and supplying AI models adapted to generate child sexual abuse material.
- UK Crime and Policing Bill 2025, Sections 72-76 — Act, In Force
- UK Superintelligence Ban Bill, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Proposed
- UK AI Safety Standards for Education, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- ScotlandNot found in the instruments we track
United States
Yes — binding law in forceAI-generated artificial or prerecorded voice calls are prohibited unless the called party consents or an exception applies.
- FCC Rules AI Voice Calls Illegal Under TCPA, III. DISCUSSION, para. 5 — Regulation, In Force
- US Federal Government Woke AI Prevention Order, Sec. 3(b) — Decree, In Force
- US TAKE IT DOWN Act 2025, Sec. 2(a), Communications Act §223(h)(3)(A) — Act, In Force
- and 13 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
39 of 51 states address this
- AlabamaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It bans knowingly distributing materially deceptive AI media near an election to harm candidates and deceive voters.
- United States - Alabama - Deepfake Regulation (HB 172), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- AlaskaProposed
It criminalizes distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse material.
- Alaska AI-CSAM and Social Media Protections Bill, Sec. 11.61.121(a) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArizonaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits creators from knowingly sponsoring, creating and distributing deceptive election deepfakes unless they include an AI disclosure.
- United States - Arizona - Deepfake Prohibition (SB 1359), A — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArkansasNot found in the instruments we track
- CaliforniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits AI or GenAI from implying that health care advice or care comes from a licensed natural person.
- California AI Healthcare Deception Law, Section 4999.9(c) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - AI Child Abuse Material (AB 1831), Section 311.2(b) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - Digital Replicas of Deceased Performers (AB 1836), California Civil Code § 3344.1 — Act, In Force
- and 7 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-07
- ColoradoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Deployers may not use high-risk AI systems that cause unlawful algorithmic discrimination.
- Colorado AI Act Delay — Act, In Force
- United States - Colorado - Synthetic Media Disclosure (HB 24-1147), Prohibition on Undisclosed Deepfakes — Act, In Force
- United States - Colorado - AI in Insurance (SB 21-169), Colorado Revised Statutes section 10-3-1104.9 — Act, In Force (Amended)
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ConnecticutPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI companions for minors may not encourage self-harm, provide unregulated mental-health services, engage romantically, or use manipulative techniques.
- Connecticut AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- United States - Connecticut - AI Impact Assessment (Public Act 23-16), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- United States - Connecticut - AI and Data Privacy Act (SB 1103), Sec. 2(c) — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- DelawarePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It bans distributing materially deceptive election deepfakes within 90 days when intended to deceive voters or harm candidates.
- United States - Delaware - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 316) — Act, In Force
- Delaware AI Medical Licensure Prohibition Act, Overview — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- FloridaNot found in the instruments we track
- GeorgiaAdopted — not yet in force
Operators may not generate sexual or manipulative content and certain relationship simulations for minors.
- Georgia AI Chatbot Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
- United States - Georgia - AI Implementation Report (SR 476), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-12-03)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- HawaiiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Operators may not use unpredictable rewards to increase known minors’ engagement with conversational AI.
- Hawaii AI Disclosure Safety Act, §481B-__, subsection (d)(1) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IdahoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act prohibits deceptive synthetic-media deepfakes of candidates in electioneering communications.
- United States - Idaho - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 664) — Act, In Force
- Idaho Synthetic Media Voyeurism Act, Section 18-6605 — Bill, In Force
- Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
Status verified 2026-09-07
- IllinoisPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits standalone AI from providing therapy and bans specified AI functions in therapeutic care.
- Illinois AI in Therapy Act — Act, In Force
- United States - Illinois - AI Employment Regulation (HB 3773), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
- Illinois AI Rental Price Coordination Ban, Overview — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IndianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids dissemination of altered or AI-generated media depicting a candidate without the required disclaimer.
- United States - Indiana - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1133) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IowaNot found in the instruments we track
- KansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act criminalizes AI-generated child sexual abuse material and nonconsensual AI-altered intimate depictions.
- Kansas AI Deepfake and Child Exploitation Prevention Act, Overview — Act, In Force
- Kansas AI Child Exploitation Act, K.S.A. 21-5510, K.S.A. 21-5611, and K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 21-610 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- KentuckyNot found in the instruments we track
- LouisianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits political telephone calls using AI-generated public-figure voices without the required disclosure.
- Louisiana AI Political Call Disclosure, R.S. 18:1463.1 — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Deepfake Crime Bill — Bill, In Force
- Louisiana AI Campaign Disclosure Act, R.S. 18:1463(H) — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MaineNot found in the instruments we track
- MarylandNot found in the instruments we track
- MassachusettsNot found in the instruments we track
- MichiganPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits knowingly distributing election-related AI-generated deceptive media intended to harm candidates or deceive voters.
- United States - Michigan - Deceptive Media Prohibition (HB 5144), Michigan Election Law §168.932f — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - Intimate Deepfakes Act (HB 4047-4048), Sec. 8(1) — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - AI in Elections (HB 5141-5145), Prohibition of Deceptive Deepfakes in Elections — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
- MinnesotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes knowing or reckless dissemination of nonconsensual election deep fakes intended to injure a candidate or influence an election.
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfake Liability (HF 1370), § 609.771, Subd. 2(a) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfakes Regulation (HF 4772), Minn. Stat. § 609.771, subd. 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MississippiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids generating, modifying, or distributing sexually explicit morphed images of minor children.
- United States - Mississippi - Protecting Children Online (HB 1126), Section 97-5-31 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- MissouriPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits advertising or representing AI as able to act as a mental health professional or provide therapy or diagnosis.
- Missouri AI Therapy Chatbot Ban, Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-11
- MontanaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits knowingly distributing or sponsoring election deepfakes of candidates or political parties within 60 days of voting.
- United States - Montana - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 25), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- NebraskaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Utilization review agents may not rely solely on AI algorithms to deny, delay, or modify healthcare services.
- Nebraska Prior Authorization Transparency Act — Act, In Force
- Nebraska Conversational AI Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- NevadaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids distributing deceptive and fraudulent deepfakes without the required disclosure.
- United States - Nevada - Deepfakes Regulation (AB 73) — Act, In Force
- New HampshirePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits owners or operators from using responsive generative communications to encourage specified harmful acts by children.
- New Hampshire AI Child Safety Law, RSA 639:3 — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfakes in Elections (HB 1596), RSA 664:14-c — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1432), RSA 638 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- New JerseyGuidance or policy only
It states that discrimination caused by automated decision-making tools is unlawful.
- United States - New Jersey - Algorithmic Discrimination Guidance (2025), Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- New MexicoNot found in the instruments we track
- New YorkAdopted — not yet in force
It prohibits deployment of frontier models that create an unreasonable risk of critical harm.
- New York RAISE Act Amendments — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
- United States - New York - Prohibit Synthetic Media (S.8400-A) — Bill, Under Review
- New York Child AI Toy Moratorium, § 1801 — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- North CarolinaGuidance or policy only
State agencies must not deploy AI that negatively affects fundamental rights, opportunities, or access to state resources.
- United States - North Carolina - Responsible AI Framework — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- North DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits distributing knowingly false political advertisements generated or manipulated with AI.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- OhioProposed
It prohibits AI-enabled persona misuse and simulated obscene material involving minors or impaired persons.
- United States - Ohio - AI Watermark Requirements (SB 217), Compliance Checklist — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- OklahomaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act criminalizes creating, possessing, accessing, or distributing AI-generated child sexual abuse material.
- Oklahoma AI Child Sexual Abuse Material Law — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
- OregonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits dissemination of campaign communications containing undisclosed AI-manipulated media.
- United States - Oregon - Synthetic Media Disclosure (SB 1571), ORS Chapter 260 — Act, In Force
- Oregon AI Companion Chatbot Safety Law, Section 1(4)(c) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- PennsylvaniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes creating or distributing AI-generated forged likenesses with intent to defraud or injure.
- Puerto RicoNot found in the instruments we track
- Rhode IslandPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Political actors may not distribute deceptive and fraudulent synthetic media within 90 days before an election.
- United States - Rhode Island - Deceptive Media in Elections (S816), Chapter 17-30 — Act, In Force
- United States - Rhode Island - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 5872), Title 17, Chapter 30 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South CarolinaProposed
It prohibits knowingly distributing deceptive synthetic media of a candidate within 90 days before an election.
- United States - South Carolina - Deepfake Media Regulation (HB 3517), Section 7-25-230(B) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits undisclosed election deepfakes used to injure a candidate or influence an election within 90 days.
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1074), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 164), Section 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TennesseePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids advertising or representing an AI system as a qualified mental health professional.
- Tennessee Bans AI Mental Health Professional Impersonation, TCA § 33-1-205 — Act, In Force
- United States - Tennessee - Voice and Image Protection (2024), Section 6, T.C.A. § 47-25-1105(a)(3) — Act, In Force
- Tennessee AI Training Felony Act, Key Focus Areas — Bill, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TexasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits specified deployments of AI systems that evaluate people.
- United States - Texas - AI Governance Act (HB 149), Sec. 552.052 — Act, In Force
- United States - Texas - Deepfakes in Elections (SB 751), Section 255.004 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- UtahPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Suppliers may not use a user's chatbot input to target, select, or customize advertisements.
- United States - Utah - AI Mental Health Regulation (HB 452), 13-72a-202(2) — Act, In Force
- Utah AI Defamation Law, Section 45-3-3(2)(c) — Act, In Force
- Utah Deepfake Ban and AI Provenance Act, Section 13-72b-201(2) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- VermontNot found in the instruments we track
- VirginiaProposed
Operators must deny companion-chatbot access when they cannot reasonably verify that a user is at least 18.
- Virginia AI Chatbot Minor Protection Act, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WashingtonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes dealing in sexually explicit fabricated depictions of minors, including depictions created using AI.
- Washington AI Child Exploitation Law, Sec. 3 — Act, In Force
- Washington Deepfake Personality Rights Act, Sec. 3 — Act, In Force
- United States - Washington - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 5152), Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- West VirginiaNot found in the instruments we track
- WisconsinNot found in the instruments we track
- WyomingPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes developing or distributing AI systems intended for child pornography or synthetic sexual material.
- Wyoming AI Child Exploitation and Deepfake Law, 6-4-308(b)(i) — Act, In Force
- Wyoming Nonconsensual Intimate Image Act, W.S. 6-4-306 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
Proposed (19)
Argentina
ProposedIt bans AI use for illegal, discriminatory, malicious, or human-rights-violating purposes.
- Argentina - AI Regulation Framework (2505-D-2023), Artículo 4.2 — Bill, Proposed
- Argentina - AI-Generated Sexual Images Bill (7225-D-2024), Artículo 128 bis — Bill, Under Review
- Argentina - AI Trustworthiness Guidelines (2/2023), Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 4 regions address this
- Buenos AiresNot found in the instruments we track
- JujuyNot found in the instruments we track
- Río NegroNot found in the instruments we track
- San JuanNot found in the instruments we track
Bahrain
ProposedThe bill prohibits deceptive, manipulative, unconsented, and illicit AI uses, including synthetic-content and biometric tampering.
- Bahrain - AI Regulation Law (2024) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
Bulgaria
ProposedThe draft prohibits unacceptable AI practices, including social scoring and unauthorized biometric mass surveillance.
- Bulgaria - AI Regulation Draft (RAI-BG-NA-DAPBPXX-2025), On compliance and enforcement — Bill, Draft
- Bulgaria - AI in Education Strategy, Key Focus Areas — Policy, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Chile
ProposedThe bill provides for restriction or prohibition of defined unacceptable-risk AI uses.
- Chile - AI and Robotics Regulation (Boletín 15869-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Development Limits (17112-19), Artículo 2 — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Systems Regulation (Boletín 16821-19) — Bill, Under Review
- and 4 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
Colombia
ProposedIt proscribes AI systems classified as posing unacceptable risks and lists harmful practices including behavioural manipulation.
- Colombia - AI Regulation (154/2024), Artículo 7 — Bill, Under Review
- Colombia - AI Regulation Bill (C200/2023) — Bill, Stalled
- Colombia - AI Regulation Framework (Senate 442/25), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Stalled
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
France
ProposedIt bans biometric categorisation or scoring and real-time biometric recognition in public or publicly accessible spaces.
- France - Biometric Recognition Bill (n°505), Article 1er — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Germany
ProposedThe bill criminalizes making certain digitally created or altered impersonating media accessible where personality rights are violated.
- Germany - Protection Against Deepfakes (222/24), B. Lösung — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 3 regions address this
- Baden-WürttembergNot found in the instruments we track
- BavariaNot found in the instruments we track
- North Rhine-WestphaliaNot found in the instruments we track
India
ProposedIt forbids discriminatory AI in critical decisions and AI-based surveillance deployment without Committee approval.
- India AI Ethics and Accountability Bill — Bill, Proposed
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 4 regions address this
- KarnatakaNot found in the instruments we track
- MaharashtraNot found in the instruments we track
- Tamil NaduNot found in the instruments we track
- TelanganaNot found in the instruments we track
Luxembourg
ProposedIt forbids placing or using AI systems that pose an unacceptable risk.
- Luxembourg - AI Act Implementation (Bill No. 8476), Article 5 AI Act — Act, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Mexico
ProposedThe draft proposals prohibit mass biometric surveillance without a judicial order, social scoring and manipulative profiling.
- Mexico - Federal AI Legislative Initiatives — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminalizing Non-consensual AI Content (2025), Article 199 Octies — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025), Articles 211 Bis 9 and 211 Bis 10 (proposed) — Bill, Under Review
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Netherlands
ProposedIt bans manipulative practices, social scoring, and unauthorized real-time biometric identification.
- Netherlands AI Act Implementation Draft, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Proposed
- Netherlands - AI Supervision Guidelines — Guideline, Adopted (from 2024-11-07)
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 1 regions address this
- AmsterdamNot found in the instruments we track
Norway
ProposedThe draft prohibits development or deployment of AI systems presenting unacceptable risks.
- Norway - AI Regulation (2026), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Poland
ProposedThe draft prohibits development or deployment of AI systems and practices expressly prohibited by law.
- Poland - AI Systems Regulation (DAISPXX/2024) — Bill, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Romania
ProposedThe bill prohibits malicious deepfake creation or dissemination for fraud, extortion, disinformation or unauthorized impersonation.
- Romania - Responsible Technology Use (PL-x 471/2023) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Spain
ProposedIt identifies subliminal manipulation, vulnerability exploitation, biometric categorisation, social scoring and certain emotion inference as prohibited practice
- Spain AI Governance Bill, Prácticas prohibidas de la IA — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
1 of 3 regions address this
- AsturiasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits harmful cognitive-behavioral manipulation and social scoring in public administration.
- Spain - Asturias - AI Regulation (98/2025) — Decree, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- CataloniaNot found in the instruments we track
- GaliciaNot found in the instruments we track
Thailand
ProposedIt prohibits use, deployment and importation of unacceptable-risk AI systems, subject to narrow exceptions.
- Thailand - AI Business Operations (2022), Key Focus Areas — Decree, Draft
- Thailand - AI Law Principles (2025) — Guideline, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
Turkey
ProposedThe bill prohibits development or deployment of AI applications classified as prohibited.
- Turkey - AI Regulation Bill (2/2234), Article 6 — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
Ukraine
ProposedIt prohibits AI systems from perpetuating or amplifying discriminatory bias.
- Ukraine - AI and Human Rights, Key Focus Areas — Non-Discrimination and Fairness — Regulation, Proposed
- Ukraine - AI Development Strategy (Order No. 1556-р) — Policy, In Force (Amended)
- Ukraine - Responsible AI in Advertising, Key Focus Areas — Manipulation Prevention — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
Uzbekistan
ProposedThe draft prohibits AI systems designed to violate fundamental rights to life, health, freedom, or dignity.
- Uzbekistan - AI Regulation (2025) — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Guidance or policy only (14)
Australia
Guidance or policy onlyIt prohibits using Australian artists’, writers’ or journalists’ creative works to train AI models without consent and control.
- Australia's National AI Standards Framework, Key Focus Areas — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
0 of 7 regions address this
- Australian Capital TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- New South WalesNot found in the instruments we track
- Northern TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- QueenslandNot found in the instruments we track
- TasmaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- VictoriaNot found in the instruments we track
- Western AustraliaNot found in the instruments we track
Canada
Guidance or policy onlyIt forbids deployment of AI systems that produce or amplify discriminatory outcomes for persons with disabilities.
- Canada - Accessible AI Standard (CAN-ASC-6.2:2025), Clause 11 — Standard, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 4 regions address this
- AlbertaNot found in the instruments we track
- British ColumbiaNot found in the instruments we track
- OntarioNot found in the instruments we track
- QuebecNot found in the instruments we track
Iraq
Guidance or policy onlyAI applications must not contribute to youth exploitation by criminal or extremist groups.
- Iraq - National AI Strategy, Compliance Checklist — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Ireland
Guidance or policy onlyIt tells developers and deployers not to develop or deploy AI systems engaging in prohibited practices.
- Ireland - AI Act Implementation Roadmap, Sources and References — Policy, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Japan
Guidance or policy onlyAI must not undermine individual autonomy or dignity.
- Japan - AI Utilization Guidelines, Key Focus Areas (6) — Guideline, Adopted (from 2019-08-09)
- Japan - AI R&D Guidelines, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Kenya
Guidance or policy onlyIt forbids deploying high-impact AI affecting rights or safety without risk-management and ethical assessments.
- Kenya - National AI Strategy — Policy, Adopted (from 2027-09-30)
- Kenya - Media Reporting Guidelines, Compliance Checklist — Guideline, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-09
Lithuania
Guidance or policy onlyPublic bodies must not deploy AI that disadvantages people based on protected characteristics.
- Lithuania - AI Use in Public Sector, Key Focus Areas — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-05-09)
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Nigeria
Guidance or policy onlyIt forbids deployment of AI systems that perpetuate or amplify societal bias.
- Nigeria - Lagos - AI Guidelines (LSAGXXX-2025) — Guideline, Adopted (from 2025-08-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Russia
Guidance or policy onlyIt prohibits AI systems designed, developed, tested, integrated or operated to purposefully cause specified harms.
- Russia - AI Ethics Guidelines (2021), Section I, 2.4 — Guideline, Adopted (from 2021-10-26)
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 2 regions address this
- MoscowNot found in the instruments we track
- TatarstanNot found in the instruments we track
Saudi Arabia
Guidance or policy onlyIt tells marketers not to use deepfakes manipulatively or unethically, including altering real events or statements.
- Saudi Arabia - Deepfakes Guidelines, 9.1. Marketing — Guideline, Draft
- Saudi Arabia - AI Ethics Principles, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Slovakia
Guidance or policy onlyEducators must not rely on unreliable forensic AI detection tools to evaluate student work.
- Slovakia - AI in Education Guidelines, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
South Korea
Guidance or policy onlyIt forbids distribution of generative-AI outputs without clear AI-generated labelling.
- South Korea AI Action Plan 2026-2028, Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
0 of 1 regions address this
- SeoulNot found in the instruments we track
United Arab Emirates
Guidance or policy onlyThe Guide tells users not to publish or distribute deceptive deepfakes for harmful purposes.
- United Arab Emirates - Deepfake Awareness Guide — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
1 of 2 regions address this
- Abu DhabiNot found in the instruments we track
- DubaiGuidance or policy only
It forbids deployment of AI that creates unjustified disparate impact or bias.
- United Arab Emirates - Dubai - Ethical AI Guidelines — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Vietnam
Guidance or policy onlyIt forbids developing or deploying AI systems that discriminate or violate fundamental human rights.
- Vietnam - Responsible AI Development (1290/QD-BKHCN), Respect for Human Rights and Dignity — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
0 of 1 regions address this
- Ho Chi Minh CityNot found in the instruments we track
Not found in the instruments we track (38)
Austria
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Bangladesh
Not found in the instruments we trackBelgium
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Costa Rica
Not found in the instruments we trackCôte d'Ivoire
Not found in the instruments we trackCroatia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Cyprus
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Czech Republic
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Denmark
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ecuador
Not found in the instruments we trackEgypt
Not found in the instruments we trackEstonia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ethiopia
Not found in the instruments we trackGhana
Not found in the instruments we trackGreece
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Hong Kong
Not found in the instruments we trackIceland
Not found in the instruments we trackIndonesia
Not found in the instruments we trackIran
Not found in the instruments we trackIsrael
Not found in the instruments we trackLebanon
Not found in the instruments we trackMalaysia
Not found in the instruments we trackMaldives
Not found in the instruments we trackMorocco
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- Casablanca-SettatNot found in the instruments we track
New Zealand
Not found in the instruments we trackPakistan
Not found in the instruments we trackPanama
Not found in the instruments we trackPortugal
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Qatar
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- DohaNot found in the instruments we track
Rwanda
Not found in the instruments we trackSenegal
Not found in the instruments we trackSerbia
Not found in the instruments we trackSlovenia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
South Africa
Not found in the instruments we trackSweden
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Switzerland
Not found in the instruments we trackTunisia
Not found in the instruments we trackUruguay
Not found in the instruments we track
International organisations (24)
African Union
Not found in the instruments we trackAPEC
Not found in the instruments we trackASEAN
Not found in the instruments we trackBRICS
Not found in the instruments we trackCouncil of Europe
Not found in the instruments we trackEuropean Union
Yes — binding law in forceThe Act prohibits AI practices deemed to present unacceptable risks, including manipulation, social scoring and specified biometric identification.
- EU AI Act, Chapter II, Article 5 — Regulation, In Force (Amended)
- EU AI Act Enforcement, Definitions — Regulation, In Force
- European Union - AI Training Data Transparency (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Recital (38) — Regulation, In Force
- and 3 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-11
G7
Not found in the instruments we trackGPAI
Not found in the instruments we trackIAEA
Not found in the instruments we trackICAO
Not found in the instruments we trackIEEE
Not found in the instruments we trackILO
Not found in the instruments we trackInternational
Not found in the instruments we trackInterpol
Not found in the instruments we trackISO
Not found in the instruments we trackITU
Not found in the instruments we trackNATO
Not found in the instruments we trackOAS
Not found in the instruments we trackOECD
Not found in the instruments we trackUNESCO
Not found in the instruments we trackUnited Nations
Guidance or policy onlyIt calls on actors to refrain from AI social scoring or mass surveillance that violates human rights.
- UN Global Digital Compact, Key Provisions — Decree, Adopted (from 2024-09-22)
- UN Ethical AI Principles for the UN System, Human autonomy and oversight — Guideline, Adopted (from 2022-09-01)
- United Nations - AI for Sustainable Development, Key Focus Areas — Decree, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
WHO
Guidance or policy onlyIt tells operators not to use health AI for coercion or unauthorized surveillance.
- WHO Health AI Ethics Guidance, Key Provisions — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
World Bank
Not found in the instruments we trackWorld Economic Forum
Not found in the instruments we track