Which countries ban certain AI practices?
Where the law forbids specific AI systems or uses, such as social scoring, manipulative techniques, real-time biometric identification or harmful deepfakes.
7 of 21 reviewed jurisdictions address this in at least one tracked instrument. Updated 2026-09-26.
Each answer cites the instrument it rests on; open it for the provision and the full analysis. Whether a rule is binding law, a bill or guidance comes from the instrument's type and status, not from wording.
“Not found” means none of the instruments we track for that jurisdiction addresses the topic. It is not a finding that no such rule exists.
Yes — binding law in force (6)
Brazil
Yes — binding law in forceIt prohibits the Judiciary from developing or using AI solutions that pose excessive risks.
- Brazil - AI Governance in Judiciary (615/2025), Art. 10 — Regulation, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
China
Yes — binding law in forceIt forbids emotional manipulation, algorithmic manipulation and inducement of unreasonable user decisions.
- China - Anthropomorphic AI Services Regulation, 第七条第(六)项 — Regulation, In Force
- China AI Content Labeling Rules, Compliance Checklist — Regulation, In Force
- China - Algorithmic Recommendation Regulation (Order No. 9), 第八条 — Regulation, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 4 regions address this
- BeijingNot found in the instruments we track
- ShanghaiNot found in the instruments we track
- ShenzhenNot found in the instruments we track
- ZhejiangNot found in the instruments we track
Kazakhstan
Yes — binding law in forceThe law bans AI systems with manipulative, social-scoring, discriminatory biometric-classification, and certain emotion-recognition functions.
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulation (2025), Статья 17, пункт 3 — Act, In Force (Amended)
- Kazakhstan Digital Code, Key Focus Areas — Act, Adopted (from 2026-07-01)
- Kazakhstan AI Ethics Code, Key Focus Areas and Prohibitions — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Singapore
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalises realistic false candidate representations in online election advertising made wholly or partly through digital means.
- Singapore - Online Advertising Integrity (2024), section 42LA(1) — Act, In Force
- Singapore - Generative AI Use in Courts (Registrar's Circular No. 1/2024) — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
United Kingdom
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalises making, adapting, possessing, supplying or offering CSA image-generators, including AI models fine-tuned for child abuse material.
- UK Crime and Policing Bill 2025, sections 72-76 — Act, In Force
- UK Superintelligence Ban Bill, Overview — Bill, Proposed
- United Kingdom - AI Playbook, Building AI solutions > Identifying use cases for AI > Use c — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- ScotlandNot found in the instruments we track
United States
Yes — binding law in forceAI-generated artificial or prerecorded voice calls are prohibited unless the called party consents or an exception applies.
- FCC Rules AI Voice Calls Illegal Under TCPA, III. DISCUSSION, para. 5 — Regulation, In Force
- US Federal Government Woke AI Prevention Order, Sec. 3(b) — Decree, In Force
- US TAKE IT DOWN Act 2025, Sec. 2(a), Communications Act §223(h)(3)(A) — Act, In Force
- and 13 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
39 of 51 states address this
- AlabamaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It bans knowingly distributing materially deceptive AI media near an election to harm candidates and deceive voters.
- United States - Alabama - Deepfake Regulation (HB 172), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- AlaskaProposed
It criminalizes distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse material.
- Alaska AI-CSAM and Social Media Protections Bill, Sec. 11.61.121(a) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArizonaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits creators from knowingly sponsoring, creating and distributing deceptive election deepfakes unless they include an AI disclosure.
- United States - Arizona - Deepfake Prohibition (SB 1359), A — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArkansasNot found in the instruments we track
- CaliforniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits AI or GenAI from implying that health care advice or care comes from a licensed natural person.
- California AI Healthcare Deception Law, Section 4999.9(c) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - AI Child Abuse Material (AB 1831), Section 311.2(b) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - Digital Replicas of Deceased Performers (AB 1836), California Civil Code § 3344.1 — Act, In Force
- and 7 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-07
- ColoradoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits knowingly or recklessly distributing undisclosed or improperly disclosed deceptive candidate deepfakes during election periods.
- United States - Colorado - Synthetic Media Disclosure (HB 24-1147) — Act, In Force
- United States - Colorado - AI in Insurance (SB 21-169), Colorado Revised Statutes section 10-3-1104.9 — Act, In Force (Amended)
- Colorado Psychotherapy AI Restrictions Act — Act, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ConnecticutPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI companions for minors may not encourage self-harm, provide unregulated mental-health services, engage romantically, or use manipulative techniques.
- Connecticut AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- United States - Connecticut - AI Impact Assessment (Public Act 23-16), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Act, In Force
- United States - Connecticut - AI and Data Privacy Act (SB 1103), Sec. 2(c) — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- DelawarePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It bans distributing materially deceptive election deepfakes within 90 days when intended to deceive voters or harm candidates.
- United States - Delaware - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 316) — Act, In Force
- Delaware AI Medical Licensure Prohibition Act, Overview — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- FloridaNot found in the instruments we track
- GeorgiaAdopted — not yet in force
Operators may not generate certain sexual, manipulative, relationship-simulating, or self-harm-related content for minors.
- Georgia AI Chatbot Safety Act, Key Focus Areas — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
- United States - Georgia - AI Governance Guidelines (2024), Key provisions — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Georgia - AI Implementation Report (SR 476) — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-12-03)
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- HawaiiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Operators may not use unpredictable rewards to increase minors' engagement with conversational AI.
- Hawaii AI Disclosure and Safety Act, §481B-__, subsection (d)(1) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IdahoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act prohibits deceptive synthetic-media deepfakes of candidates in electioneering communications.
- United States - Idaho - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 664) — Act, In Force
- Idaho Synthetic Media Voyeurism Act, Section 18-6605 — Bill, In Force
- Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
Status verified 2026-09-07
- IllinoisPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act prohibits standalone AI from providing therapy and forbids specified autonomous or direct therapeutic AI functions.
- Illinois AI in Therapy Act, Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
- United States - Illinois - AI Video Interview Regulation (2019), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
- United States - Illinois - AI Employment Regulation (HB 3773), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IndianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids dissemination of altered or AI-generated media depicting a candidate without the required disclaimer.
- United States - Indiana - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1133) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IowaNot found in the instruments we track
- KansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act criminalizes AI-generated child sexual abuse material and nonconsensual AI-altered intimate depictions.
- Kansas AI Deepfake and Child Exploitation Prevention Act, Overview — Act, In Force
- Kansas AI Child Exploitation Act, K.S.A. 21-5510, K.S.A. 21-5611, and K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 21-610 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- KentuckyNot found in the instruments we track
- LouisianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits political telephone calls using AI-generated public-figure voices unless proper disclosure is provided.
- Louisiana AI Political Call Disclosure, R.S. 18:1463.1 — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Deepfake Crime Bill — Bill, In Force
- Louisiana AI Campaign Disclosure Act, R.S. 18:1463(H) — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MainePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids deceptive AI-mediated consumer interactions that make consumers believe they are communicating with a human.
- United States - Maine - AI Transparency Act, Section 1500-DD — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- MarylandNot found in the instruments we track
- MassachusettsNot found in the instruments we track
- MichiganPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Prohibits knowingly distributing deceptive AI-generated election media intended to harm candidates or deceive voters.
- United States - Michigan - Deceptive Media Prohibition (HB 5144), MCL 168.932f — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - Intimate Deepfakes Act (HB 4047-4048), Sec. 8(1) — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - AI in Elections (HB 5141-5145), Prohibition of Deceptive Deepfakes in Elections — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
- MinnesotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes knowing or reckless dissemination of nonconsensual election deep fakes intended to injure a candidate or influence an election.
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfake Liability (HF 1370), § 609.771, Subd. 2(a) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfakes Regulation (HF 4772), Minn. Stat. § 609.771, subd. 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MississippiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids generating, modifying, or distributing sexually explicit morphed images of minor children.
- United States - Mississippi - Protecting Children Online (HB 1126), Section 97-5-31 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- MissouriPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits advertising or representing AI as able to act as a mental health professional or provide therapy or diagnosis.
- Missouri AI Therapy Chatbot Ban, Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-11
- MontanaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits knowingly distributing or sponsoring election deepfakes of candidates or political parties within 60 days of voting.
- United States - Montana - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 25), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- NebraskaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Utilization review agents may not rely solely on AI algorithms to deny, delay, or modify healthcare services.
- Nebraska Prior Authorization Transparency Act — Act, In Force
- Nebraska Conversational AI Safety Act, Sections 12 through 18 — Act, Awaiting Entry
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- NevadaNot found in the instruments we track
- New HampshirePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act bars AI chat communications to minors that facilitate or encourage specified harmful conduct.
- New Hampshire AI Child Safety Law, RSA 639:3 — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfakes in Elections (HB 1596), RSA 664:14-c — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1432), RSA 638 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- New JerseyGuidance or policy only
It states that discrimination resulting from automated decision-making tools is unlawful.
- United States - New Jersey - Algorithmic Discrimination Guidance (2025), Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- New MexicoNot found in the instruments we track
- New YorkAdopted — not yet in force
Developers may not deploy frontier models that create an unreasonable risk of critical harm.
- New York RAISE Act Amendments — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
- United States - New York - Prohibit Synthetic Media (S.8400-A) — Bill, Under Review
- New York Child AI Toy Moratorium, § 1801 — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- North CarolinaGuidance or policy only
State agencies must not deploy AI that negatively affects fundamental rights, opportunities, or access to state resources.
- United States - North Carolina - Responsible AI Framework, Key Focus Areas — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- North DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits distributing knowingly false political advertisements generated or manipulated with AI.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- OhioProposed
It prohibits AI-enabled persona misuse and simulated obscene material involving minors or impaired persons.
- United States - Ohio - AI Watermark Requirements (SB 217), Compliance Checklist — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- OklahomaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act criminalizes creating, possessing, accessing, or distributing AI-generated child sexual abuse material.
- Oklahoma AI Child Sexual Abuse Material Law — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
- OregonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits dissemination of campaign communications containing undisclosed AI-manipulated media.
- United States - Oregon - Synthetic Media Disclosure (SB 1571), ORS Chapter 260 — Act, In Force
- Oregon AI Companion Chatbot Safety Law, Section 1(4)(c) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- PennsylvaniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes creating or distributing AI-generated forged likenesses with intent to defraud or injure.
- Puerto RicoNot found in the instruments we track
- Rhode IslandPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Political actors may not distribute deceptive and fraudulent synthetic media within 90 days before an election.
- United States - Rhode Island - Deceptive Media in Elections (S816), Chapter 17-30 — Act, In Force
- United States - Rhode Island - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 5872), Title 17, Chapter 30 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South CarolinaProposed
It prohibits knowingly distributing deceptive synthetic media of a candidate within 90 days before an election.
- United States - South Carolina - Deepfake Media Regulation (HB 3517), Section 7-25-230(B) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits undisclosed election deepfakes used to injure a candidate or influence an election within 90 days.
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1074), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 164), Section 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TennesseePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It forbids advertising or representing an AI system as a qualified mental health professional.
- Tennessee Bans AI Mental Health Professional Impersonation, TCA § 33-1-205 — Act, In Force
- United States - Tennessee - Voice and Image Protection (2024), Section 6, T.C.A. § 47-25-1105(a)(3) — Act, In Force
- Tennessee AI Training Felony Act, Compliance Checklist — Bill, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TexasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes creating and distributing deceptive deepfake videos to injure candidates or influence elections.
- United States - Texas - Deepfakes in Elections (SB 751), Section 255.004 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- UtahPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Suppliers may not use mental health chatbots to advertise products or services to users except under stated conditions.
- United States - Utah - AI Mental Health Regulation (HB 452), Section 13-72a-202(1) — Act, In Force
- Utah AI Defamation Law, Section 45-3-3(2)(c) — Act, In Force
- Utah Deepfake Ban and AI Provenance Act, Section 13-72b-201(2) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- VermontNot found in the instruments we track
- VirginiaProposed
Operators must deny companion-chatbot access when they cannot reasonably verify that a user is at least 18.
- Virginia AI Chatbot Minor Protection Act, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WashingtonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes dealing in sexually explicit fabricated depictions of minors, including those created using AI.
- Washington AI Child Exploitation Law, Sec. 2, RCW 9.68A.011(1) — Act, In Force
- Washington Deepfake Personality Rights Act, Sec. 3 — Act, In Force
- United States - Washington - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 5152), Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- West VirginiaNot found in the instruments we track
- WisconsinNot found in the instruments we track
- WyomingPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images, including computer-generated media.
- Wyoming Nonconsensual Intimate Image Act, W.S. 6-4-306 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
Proposed (6)
Argentina
ProposedIt prohibits AI uses for illegal, discriminatory, malicious purposes or those violating human rights.
- Argentina - AI Regulation Framework (2505-D-2023), Artículo 4.2 — Bill, Proposed
- Argentina - Responsible AI Use (3003-D-2024), Artículo 7.1 — Bill, Under Review
- Argentina - AI-Generated Sexual Images Bill (7225-D-2024), Artículo 128 bis — Bill, Under Review
- and 2 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 4 regions address this
- Buenos AiresNot found in the instruments we track
- JujuyNot found in the instruments we track
- Río NegroNot found in the instruments we track
- San JuanNot found in the instruments we track
Chile
ProposedThe bill restricts or prohibits AI uses classified as unacceptable risk.
- Chile - AI and Robotics Regulation (Boletín 15869-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Development Limits (17112-19), Artículo 2 — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Systems Regulation (Boletín 16821-19), Overview — Bill, Under Review
- and 4 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
India
ProposedIt forbids discriminatory AI in critical decisions and AI-based surveillance deployment without Committee approval.
- India AI Ethics and Accountability Bill — Bill, Proposed
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 4 regions address this
- KarnatakaNot found in the instruments we track
- MaharashtraNot found in the instruments we track
- Tamil NaduNot found in the instruments we track
- TelanganaNot found in the instruments we track
Indonesia
ProposedIt identifies unregulated biometric mass surveillance as a prohibited AI use.
- Indonesia - Draft AI Bill — Bill, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-07
Mexico
ProposedThe draft forbids mass biometric surveillance without judicial authorization, social scoring, and manipulative psychological profiling.
- Mexico - Federal AI Legislative Initiatives — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminalizing Non-consensual AI Content (2025), Article 199 Octies — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025), Articles 211 Bis 8, 211 Bis 9 and 211 Bis 10 — Bill, Under Review
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Turkey
ProposedIt forbids development or deployment of prohibited AI applications and bars discriminatory datasets.
- Turkey - AI Regulation Bill (2/2234), Article 6 — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
Guidance or policy only (5)
Australia
Guidance or policy onlyIt prohibits using Australian artists’, writers’ or journalists’ creative works to train AI models without consent and control.
- Australia's National AI Standards Framework, Key Focus Areas — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
0 of 7 regions address this
- Australian Capital TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- New South WalesNot found in the instruments we track
- Northern TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- QueenslandNot found in the instruments we track
- TasmaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- VictoriaNot found in the instruments we track
- Western AustraliaNot found in the instruments we track
Canada
Guidance or policy onlyIt forbids deployment of AI that produces or amplifies discriminatory outcomes for people with disabilities.
- Canada - Accessible AI Standard (CAN-ASC-6.2:2025) — Standard, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 4 regions address this
- AlbertaNot found in the instruments we track
- British ColumbiaNot found in the instruments we track
- OntarioNot found in the instruments we track
- QuebecNot found in the instruments we track
Japan
Guidance or policy onlyAI must not undermine individual autonomy or dignity.
- Japan - AI Utilization Guidelines, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, Adopted (from 2019-08-09)
- Japan - Human-Centric AI Principles, Section 4.1(1) — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
Saudi Arabia
Guidance or policy onlyIt tells marketers not to use deepfakes manipulatively or unethically, including altering real events or statements.
- Saudi Arabia - Deepfakes Guidelines, 9.1. Marketing — Guideline, Draft
- Saudi Arabia - AI Ethics Principles — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
United Arab Emirates
Guidance or policy onlyThe Guide tells users not to publish or distribute deceptive deepfakes for harmful purposes.
- United Arab Emirates - Deepfake Awareness Guide — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
1 of 2 regions address this
- Abu DhabiNot found in the instruments we track
- DubaiGuidance or policy only
It forbids deployment of AI systems producing unjustified disparate impact or bias against affected groups.
- United Arab Emirates - Dubai - Ethical AI Guidelines — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Not found in the instruments we track (3)
South Korea
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- SeoulNot found in the instruments we track
Switzerland
Not found in the instruments we trackVietnam
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- Ho Chi Minh CityNot found in the instruments we track
International organisations (1)
European Union
Yes — binding law in forceIt prohibits AI practices posing unacceptable risks, including subliminal manipulation, social scoring, and certain biometric identification.
- EU AI Act, Chapter II, Article 5 — Regulation, In Force (Amended)
- EU AI Act Enforcement, Definitions — Regulation, In Force
- European Union - AI Training Data Transparency (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Recital (38) — Regulation, In Force
- and 3 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-11
Not yet reviewed for this topic (65)
We track instruments for these jurisdictions but have not yet classified them for this topic. This is not a finding that they have no such rule.
Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan