Which countries regulate generative AI?
Rules specific to generative AI, foundation and general-purpose models, chatbots and AI-generated content.
19 of 109 reviewed jurisdictions address this in at least one tracked instrument. Updated 2026-10-04.
Each answer cites the instrument it rests on; open it for the provision and the full analysis. Whether a rule is binding law, a bill or guidance comes from the instrument's type and status, not from wording.
“Not found” means none of the instruments we track for that jurisdiction addresses the topic. It is not a finding that no such rule exists.
Yes — binding law in force (17)
Argentina
Yes — binding law in forceThe decree makes its generative-AI protocol binding on public-administration personnel using such tools.
- Argentina - Santa Fe - AI Adoption Protocol (2726/2025), Artículo 3° — Decree, In Force
- Argentina - San Luis - Judicial AI Protocol (2024), Implementation Framework, Phase 2: Training — Regulation, In Force
- Argentina - Virtual Assistant Implementation (1486/2025), Resolution overview — Regulation, In Force
- and 7 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
4 of 4 regions address this
- Buenos AiresGuidance or policy only
The guidelines impose binding rules on the use of generative AI by provincial public administration personnel.
- Argentina - Buenos Aires - Generative AI Guidelines, Overview — Guideline, In Force
- JujuyGuidance or policy only
Users must complete an ethical-use declaration before using generative AI tools.
- Argentina - Jujuy - AI Use Protocol (Acordada N° 31/2025), Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
- Río NegroGuidance or policy only
Projects involving generative AI in judicial workflows require prior authorization from the STJ.
- Argentina - Río Negro - AI Good Practices Protocol (RAI-AR-RN-PDBPPXX-2024), Governance and Institutional Framework — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
- San JuanPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits use of non-approved external generative AI tools for private judicial case data.
- Argentina - San Juan - AI Judicial Protocol (2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Brazil
Yes — binding law in forceGenerative AI used to assist judicial drafting must be automatically recorded in the court's internal system.
- Brazil - AI Governance in Judiciary (615/2025), Art. 19, § 6º — Regulation, In Force
- Brazil - National AI Regulation (2.338/2023), Capítulo III, Seção I, § 1º — Bill, Under Review
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
China
Yes — binding law in forceIt regulates AI-powered anthropomorphic services and imposes requirements on model training and generated content.
- China - Anthropomorphic AI Services Regulation, 第二条 — Regulation, In Force
- China AI Content Labeling Rules, Key Focus Areas — Regulation, In Force
- China - Generative AI Services Management, 第二条 — Regulation, In Force
- and 5 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 4 regions address this
- BeijingNot found in the instruments we track
- ShanghaiNot found in the instruments we track
- ShenzhenNot found in the instruments we track
- ZhejiangNot found in the instruments we track
Finland
Yes — binding law in forceUsers must be informed when viewing AI-generated content.
- Finland AI Act Implementation Law, Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- Finland - AI Regulation Implementation (HE 46/2025), Compliance Checklist FI-AI-REG-05 — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 1 regions address this
- HelsinkiNot found in the instruments we track
Hungary
Yes — binding law in forceIt imposes transparency obligations on certain generative and general-purpose AI models.
- Hungary - EU AI Regulation Implementation (LXXV/2025) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Italy
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminalizes non-consensual harmful dissemination of AI-generated or altered deceptive audiovisual content.
- Italy - AI Regulation (n.132/2025), Art. 26, comma 1, lettera c) — Act, In Force
- Italy - Temporary Order Against ChatGPT, Core obligations / prescriptions — Regulation, In Force
- Italy - AI Adoption Guidelines, §7.1 — Guideline, Draft
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 2 regions address this
- Emilia-RomagnaNot found in the instruments we track
- LombardyNot found in the instruments we track
Kazakhstan
Yes — binding law in forceSynthetic AI-generated results may be distributed only with machine-readable marking and a perceivable warning.
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulation (2025), Статья 21, пункт 2 — Act, In Force (Amended)
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulatory Amendments (232-VIII), Article 641-1 — Act, In Force
- Kazakhstan Digital Code, Compliance Checklist — Act, Adopted (from 2026-07-01)
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Latvia
Yes — binding law in forceIt specifically prohibits certain uses of deepfake-generated audio, video and other synthetic content during elections.
- Latvia - Criminalising Deepfake Use (90.1/2024), Article 90.1 — Act, In Force
- Latvia - AI Use in Campaigning (2024), Article 3¹ — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Malta
Yes — binding law in forceOperators must provide transparency disclosures, including labelling of synthetic AI content and general-purpose model disclosures.
- Malta - AI Regulations (226/2025), Key Focus Areas — Regulation, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Peru
Yes — binding law in forceIt criminally sanctions AI-generated multimedia and deepfakes used for child pornography or defamatory false content.
- Peru - AI Use as Aggravating Circumstance (32314/2025), Artículo 129-M — Act, In Force
- Peru - AI Digital Labeling Bill (6524/2023), Artículo 5 — Bill, Proposed
- Peru - AI Penal Code Amendments (8746/2024) — Bill, Adopted (from 2025-04-30)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Philippines
Yes — binding law in forceAI-used election propaganda must disclose AI use and employ technology identifying authenticity and source.
- Philippines - AI Campaign Content Prohibition (11064/2024), Article IV, Section 1 — Regulation, In Force
- Philippines - AI Regulation for Elections (HB 10567) — Bill, Under Review
Singapore
Yes — binding law in forceThe Guide imposes mandatory obligations on court users when they use Generative AI tools.
- Singapore - Generative AI Use in Courts (Registrar's Circular No. 1/2024), Core obligations — Regulation, In Force
- Singapore - AI Model Risk Management, Section 1.2 — Guideline, In Force
- Singapore - AI Governance Framework, Compliance Checklist — Guideline, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
South Korea
Yes — binding law in forceGenerative AI providers must indicate when outputs were generated by generative AI.
- South Korea AI Trust Framework Act, Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- South Korea - AI Impact Assessment, Compliance Checklist — Regulation, In Force
- South Korea - AI Industry Promotion (AIPTRXX/2022), Compliance Checklist — Bill, Proposed
- and 2 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
1 of 1 regions address this
- SeoulGuidance or policy only
Generative AI users, including public officials, are expected to follow self-regulatory ethical measures.
- South Korea - Seoul - AI Administration Plan (SAAPXXX/2024), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-04-02)
Status verified 2026-09-10
Taiwan
Yes — binding law in forceIt requires disclosure and labelling of AI-generated content and decisions.
- Taiwan AI Basic Act — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- KaohsiungNot found in the instruments we track
United Kingdom
Yes — binding law in forceIt prohibits specified conduct involving AI models fine-tuned to generate child sexual abuse material.
- UK Crime and Policing Bill 2025, Sections 72-76 — Act, In Force
- United Kingdom - AI Playbook, Principle 3: You know how to use AI securely — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
- United Kingdom - AI Safety Cooperation, Key Focus Areas — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-11-01)
- and 2 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- ScotlandNot found in the instruments we track
United States
Yes — binding law in forceThe ruling applies TCPA consent requirements to AI voice cloning and AI-generated voice calls.
- FCC Rules AI Voice Calls Illegal Under TCPA, III. DISCUSSION, para. 5 — Regulation, In Force
- US TAKE IT DOWN Act 2025, Sec. 2(a), Communications Act §223(h)(1)(B) — Act, In Force
- TRUMP AMERICA AI Act, Implementation Timeline — Bill, Proposed
- and 8 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
38 of 51 states address this
- AlabamaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates artificial-intelligence-generated election media, including deepfakes and synthetic content.
- United States - Alabama - Deepfake Regulation (HB 172), Key Focus Areas — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-17
- AlaskaProposed
It regulates generated and manipulated child sexual abuse depictions through criminal offenses.
- Alaska AI-CSAM and Social Media Protections Bill, Sec. 11.61.122(a)(2) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArizonaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates synthetic election media, including deceptive deepfakes and content generated by artificial intelligence.
- United States - Arizona - Deepfake Prohibition (SB 1359), A — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ArkansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Generated AI content must not infringe existing copyright or intellectual-property rights.
- United States - Arkansas - AI Content Ownership (Act 927) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- CaliforniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates foundation models and frontier models, requiring developer safety frameworks, transparency reports, and incident reporting.
- United States - California - AI Transparency Act (SB 53), Section 22757.11(f) — Act, In Force
- California AI Healthcare Deception Law, Section 4999.9(b) — Act, In Force
- United States - California - AI Child Abuse Material (AB 1831), Section 311.2(b) — Act, In Force
- and 13 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
- ColoradoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Individuals must be clearly told when they interact directly with a generative AI system.
- Colorado AI Act Delay — Act, In Force
- United States - Colorado - Synthetic Media Disclosure (HB 24-1147), Overview — Act, In Force
- Colorado Chatbot Safety Act, Definitions — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- ConnecticutPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Developers must ensure AI-generated or manipulated digital content is marked and detectable as synthetic when consumers first encounter it.
- Connecticut AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- Connecticut Comprehensive AI Act — Bill, Adopted
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- DelawarePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates deceptive synthetic media and deepfakes generated or manipulated using advanced techniques in elections.
- United States - Delaware - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 316) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- FloridaNot found in the instruments we track
- GeorgiaAdopted — not yet in force
The Act imposes safety, disclosure, and crisis-response duties on conversational AI service operators.
- Georgia AI Chatbot Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
- United States - Georgia - AI Governance Guidelines (2024), Governance and Institutional Framework — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Georgia - AI Implementation Report (SR 476), Penalties, Liability, and Appeals — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-12-03)
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- HawaiiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Operators must adopt protocols preventing conversational AI from producing suicidal ideation, suicide, or self-harm content.
- Hawaii AI Disclosure Safety Act, §481B-__, subsection (c)(2) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IdahoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act regulates synthetic media, including media created using generative adversarial network techniques.
- United States - Idaho - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 664), Definitions — Act, In Force
- Idaho K-12 Generative AI Education Act, Governance and Institutional Framework — Act, In Force
- Idaho Synthetic Media Voyeurism Act, Section 18-6605 — Bill, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
- IllinoisPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
AI-generated therapeutic recommendations or treatment plans require professional review and approval.
- Illinois AI in Therapy Act — Act, In Force
- Illinois AI Teacher Evaluation Ban, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Adopted
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- IndianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Campaign communications containing digitally altered or artificially generated media must carry a disclaimer.
- United States - Indiana - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1133) — Act, In Force
- United States - Indiana - Media Alteration Disclosure (Public Law 81/2024), Existing Statutes and Recent Legislation table (2024 Indiana — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- IowaNot found in the instruments we track
- KansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act specifically regulates AI-generated and AI-altered sexual imagery, including synthetic child sexual abuse material.
- Kansas AI Deepfake and Child Exploitation Prevention Act, Overview — Act, In Force
- Kansas AI Child Exploitation Act, K.S.A. 21-5510, K.S.A. 21-5611, and K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 21-610 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- KentuckyNot found in the instruments we track
- LouisianaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Campaign calls using AI to generate or simulate a public figure's voice must disclose that use.
- Louisiana AI Political Call Disclosure, R.S. 18:1463.1 — Act, In Force
- Louisiana AI Deepfake Crime Bill — Bill, In Force
- Louisiana AI Campaign Disclosure Act, R.S. 18:1463(H) — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MaineNot found in the instruments we track
- MarylandNot found in the instruments we track
- MassachusettsNot found in the instruments we track
- MichiganPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates AI-generated materially deceptive media, commonly called deepfakes, in elections.
- United States - Michigan - Deceptive Media Prohibition (HB 5144), Michigan Election Law §168.932f (Definitions) — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - Intimate Deepfakes Act (HB 4047-4048), Sec. 3(b)(ii) — Act, In Force
- United States - Michigan - AI in Elections (HB 5141-5145), Key Focus Areas—Disclosure Requirements for AI-Generated Pol — Act, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
- MinnesotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates realistic technologically produced deep fakes by prohibiting their dissemination in specified election-related circumstances.
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfake Liability (HF 1370), § 609.771, Subd. 1(c) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- United States - Minnesota - Deepfakes Regulation (HF 4772), Minn. Stat. § 609.771, subd. 2 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MississippiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates and criminalizes certain dissemination of AI- or machine-learning-generated deepfakes.
- United States - Mississippi - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 2577), Section 1(1)(b) — Act, In Force
- United States - Mississippi - Protecting Children Online (HB 1126), Section 97-5-31 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- MissouriNot found in the instruments we track
- MontanaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates AI-generated deepfakes in election and electioneering communications.
- United States - Montana - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 25), Definitions — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- NebraskaAdopted — not yet in force
The Act regulates publicly accessible conversational AI services that simulate human conversation.
- Nebraska Conversational AI Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
- NevadaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Election communications containing AI-created synthetic media are subject to disclosure rules.
- United States - Nevada - Deepfakes Regulation (AB 73) — Act, In Force
- New HampshirePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates responsive generative AI communications, including AI chat programs, large language models, and chatbots.
- New Hampshire AI Child Safety Law — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfakes in Elections (HB 1596), RSA 664:14-c — Act, In Force
- United States - New Hampshire - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1432), RSA 638 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- New JerseyNot found in the instruments we track
- New MexicoNot found in the instruments we track
- New YorkPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act regulates advanced frontier AI models through developer transparency and safety obligations.
- New York AI Frontier Model Safety Requirements Act, Overview — Act, In Force
- United States - New York - Deepfakes Regulation (Chapter 56/2024), Election Law § 14-107-a — Act, In Force
- United States - New York - Prohibit Synthetic Media (S.8400-A) — Bill, Under Review
- and 2 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- North CarolinaNot found in the instruments we track
- North DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Political communications created or substantially altered using AI must carry a disclosure statement.
Status verified 2026-09-08
- OhioProposed
It regulates AI-generated products and synthetic content, including watermarking and simulated obscene material.
- United States - Ohio - AI Watermark Requirements (SB 217), Compliance Checklist — Bill, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- OklahomaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It specifically covers AI-generated and computer-generated child sexual abuse material.
- Oklahoma AI Child Sexual Abuse Material Law — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
- OregonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Campaign communications using AI-created synthetic media must carry disclosures.
- United States - Oregon - Synthetic Media Disclosure (SB 1571), ORS Chapter 260 — Act, In Force
- United States - Oregon - AI in Campaigns (SB 1571), SECTION 1(2) — Act, In Force
- Oregon AI Companion Chatbot Safety Law, Section 1(1)(a)(A) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-08
- PennsylvaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- Puerto RicoProposed
Campaign communications must disclose their use of artificial intelligence.
- United States - Puerto Rico - AI Regulation (SB 68), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Proposed
Status verified 2026-09-08
- Rhode IslandPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Synthetic media may be distributed only where it carries a disclosure that it was manipulated or AI-generated.
- United States - Rhode Island - Deceptive Media in Elections (S816), Chapter 17-30 — Act, In Force
- United States - Rhode Island - Deepfakes Regulation (HB 5872), Title 17, Chapter 30 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South CarolinaProposed
It regulates and prohibits distribution of certain election deepfakes created using GAN techniques or other digital technology.
- United States - South Carolina - Deepfake Media Regulation (HB 3517), Section 7-25-230(A)(1) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
- South DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It regulates AI-generated or manipulated media used as election deepfakes and requires disclosures.
- United States - South Dakota - Deepfake Regulation (HB 1074), Overview — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TennesseePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Political advertisers using deceptive deepfake audio or video must include specified disclaimers.
- Tennessee Deepfake Political Ads Law, Overview — Act, In Force
- United States - Tennessee - Voice and Image Protection (2024), Section 6, T.C.A. § 47-25-1105(a)(3) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TexasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It prohibits specified election-related uses of deceptive AI-generated deepfake content.
- United States - Texas - Deepfakes in Elections (SB 751), Section 255.004 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- UtahPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Providers of regulated occupations must disclose when a person interacts with generative AI in regulated services.
- United States - Utah - AI Policy Act (SB 149), Section 13-2-12(4)(a) — Act, In Force
- United States - Utah - AI Consumer Protection (SB 226), Section 13-75-103(1)(a) — Act, In Force
- Utah Deepfake Ban and AI Provenance Act, Section 13-72c-203 — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-10
- VermontNot found in the instruments we track
- VirginiaProposed
The bill imposes operational duties on operators of AI chatbots, including companion chatbots.
- Virginia AI Chatbot Minor Protection Act, Overview — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WashingtonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The criminal prohibitions encompass visual matter created or altered using artificial intelligence.
- Washington AI Child Exploitation Law, Sec. 2, RCW 9.68A.011(1) — Act, In Force
- Washington Deepfake Personality Rights Act, Sec. 2(3)(a) — Act, In Force
- United States - Washington - Deepfakes Regulation (SB 5152), Compliance Checklist — Act, In Force
- and 4 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
- West VirginiaNot found in the instruments we track
- WisconsinPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
Political audio and video communications containing synthetic media made with generative AI must carry specified disclosures.
- United States - Wisconsin - Deepfakes Regulation (Act 123), s. 11.1303 (2m) (a) 2. — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
- WyomingPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
It criminalizes use of AI to generate or create child pornography.
- Wyoming AI Child Exploitation and Deepfake Law, 6-4-303(b)(v) — Act, In Force
- Wyoming Nonconsensual Intimate Image Act, W.S. 6-4-306 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
Vietnam
Yes — binding law in forceAI-generated content must be clearly labelled.
- Vietnam AI Act 2025 — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
0 of 1 regions address this
- Ho Chi Minh CityNot found in the instruments we track
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law (1)
Nigeria
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) lawPlatforms must not host or allow dissemination of deepfakes.
- Nigeria - Code of Practice for Platforms (2022) — Regulation, In Force
- Nigeria - AI Technology Control (HB 942), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
- Nigeria - AI Code of Practice (2025), Key Focus Areas — Regulation, Draft
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
Proposed (15)
Bahrain
ProposedThe bill prohibits deceptive synthetic media and unconsented alteration of audio, visual, and textual content.
- Bahrain - AI Regulation Law (2024) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
Chile
ProposedSynthetic and AI-generated content must be labelled and disclosed where required.
- Chile - AI Systems Regulation (Boletín 16821-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - Criminal Code Amendment (Boletín 15935-07), Articles 468 and 469 — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - Identity Usurpation via AI (Boletín 16112-07), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
- and 3 more
Colombia
ProposedProviders must label AI-generated synthetic content.
- Colombia - Ethical AI Law Proposal (PL 005/2024C), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Stalled
- Colombia - AI Regulation (154/2024), Artículo 7 — Bill, Under Review
- Colombia - AI Regulation Framework (Senate 442/25), Compliance Checklist — Bill, Stalled
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Croatia
ProposedProviders of general-purpose AI models have duties concerning training-data summaries and model evaluations.
- Croatia - AI Act Transposition Process (2025) — Bill, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Germany
ProposedThe targeted offence covers deepfakes and comparable technically manipulated or artificially generated media content.
- Germany - Protection Against Deepfakes (222/24), B. Lösung — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 3 regions address this
- Baden-WürttembergNot found in the instruments we track
- BavariaNot found in the instruments we track
- North Rhine-WestphaliaNot found in the instruments we track
Luxembourg
ProposedIt requires compliance with transparency obligations for general-purpose AI models.
- Luxembourg - AI Act Implementation (Bill No. 8476) — Act, Under Review
- Luxembourg - AI in Schools Guidelines, Implementation requirements — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Mexico
ProposedThe bill targets intimate sexual media generated or altered using AI, including synthetic deepfakes.
- Mexico - Criminalizing Non-consensual AI Content (2025), Article 199 Octies — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025) — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Protect Dubbing Actors (2025) — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-07
Netherlands
ProposedUsers must be informed when viewing AI-generated content such as deepfakes.
- Netherlands AI Act Implementation Draft, Key Focus Areas — Bill, Proposed
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 1 regions address this
- AmsterdamNot found in the instruments we track
Norway
ProposedThe draft imposes model-level obligations on foundation and general-purpose models when system risk arises.
- Norway - AI Regulation (2026), Compliance Checklist — Bill, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Poland
ProposedThe draft requires transparency measures including labels for AI-generated content.
- Poland - AI Systems Regulation (DAISPXX/2024) — Bill, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Romania
ProposedThe draft requires labelling of AI-generated content where relevant.
- Romania - AI Legal Framework (B154/2024), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
- Romania - Responsible Technology Use (PL-x 471/2023) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Spain
ProposedAI-generated or manipulated images, audio and video constituting deepfakes must be identified as AI-generated.
- Spain AI Governance Bill, Sistemas de alto riesgo — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
0 of 3 regions address this
- AsturiasNot found in the instruments we track
- CataloniaNot found in the instruments we track
- GaliciaNot found in the instruments we track
Thailand
ProposedIt requires labelling AI outputs and disclosure of AI involvement for limited-risk systems.
- Thailand - AI Business Operations (2022), Operational obligations — Decree, Draft
- Thailand - AI Risk Management Guidelines, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
Turkey
ProposedAI-generated audiovisual, audio and textual content must receive persistent labeling.
- Turkey - AI Law Amendments (Esas No. 2/3358), Key Focus Areas — Bill, Under Review
- Turkey - Deepfake Information Note, Governance and Institutional Framework — Guideline, In Force
- Turkey - GAI Ethics Guide, Overview — Guideline, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
Uzbekistan
ProposedAI-created information resources must be labeled, regulating AI-generated content.
- Uzbekistan - AI Regulation (2025) — Bill, Proposed
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Guidance or policy only (22)
Australia
Guidance or policy onlyIt encourages voluntary labelling or watermarking of AI-generated content.
- Australia - AI Regulation Discussion Paper, Implementation Framework — Policy, Draft
- Australia - AI Governance Interim Response, Compliance Checklist — Policy, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
2 of 7 regions address this
- Australian Capital TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- New South WalesNot found in the instruments we track
- Northern TerritoryNot found in the instruments we track
- QueenslandGuidance or policy only
Agencies must not use government-held personal information to train AI tools through LLMs unless exempt.
- Australia - Queensland - AI Governance Policy (RAI-AU-QL-ARTINGO-2024), Compliance Checklist — Restrict Training Data Use — Policy, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
- TasmaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- VictoriaGuidance or policy only
The guideline sets mandatory operational requirements for generative AI used in Victorian public-sector work.
- Australia - Victoria - Generative AI Guidelines, Overview — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
- Western AustraliaNot found in the instruments we track
Canada
Guidance or policy onlyFederal institutions are directed to limit generative AI use to situations where risks can be managed.
- Canada - Generative AI Guidance, Guide overview — Guideline, In Force
- Canada - AI Systems Management Guide, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force
- Canada - Responsible AI Development, The Code is organized around six core principles — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
1 of 4 regions address this
- AlbertaNot found in the instruments we track
- British ColumbiaGuidance or policy only
Generative-AI outputs must be reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with government standards.
- Canada - British Columbia - AI Responsible Use Principles, Compliance Checklist — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
- OntarioNot found in the instruments we track
- QuebecNot found in the instruments we track
Cyprus
Guidance or policy onlyIt imposes documentation, logging and disclosure obligations for general-purpose AI systems.
- Cyprus - AI Regulation Implementation (2024/1689), Key Focus Areas (4) — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-11-06)
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Denmark
Guidance or policy onlyThe guidance gives practice-oriented advice on deploying generative AI.
- Denmark - Responsible Generative AI Guidelines, Published by Digitaliseringsstyrelsen — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Hong Kong
Guidance or policy onlyThe Guideline gives operational recommendations for developers, providers and users of generative AI.
- Hong Kong - AI Development Guidelines (2025), Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Indonesia
Guidance or policy onlyOperators must label AI-generated content for users.
- Indonesia - Ethical Guidelines for AI, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-08
Ireland
Guidance or policy onlyGenAI users must disclose AI-generated content, particularly in public or stakeholder communications.
- Ireland - Responsible AI Use Guidelines, Chapter 8, Recommendations for GenAI End-Users — Guideline, In Force
- Ireland - AI Act Implementation Roadmap, Compliance Checklist, IE-GPAI-1 — Policy, Adopted
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Israel
Guidance or policy onlyIt requires separate legal review of generated model outputs for potential copyright infringement.
- Israel - Copyright Use for Machine Learning, Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
Kenya
Guidance or policy onlyIt requires labelling AI-generated and AI-assisted content used by media outlets.
- Kenya - Media Reporting Guidelines, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-10
Lithuania
Guidance or policy onlyDeployers generating or manipulating deepfakes should disclose their artificial origin.
- Lithuania - AI Development Amendments (XV-105), (134) — Act, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Malaysia
Guidance or policy onlyIt recommends user disclosures where AI systems generate content.
- Malaysia - AI Governance Guidelines, Compliance Checklist — Guideline, In Force
New Zealand
Guidance or policy onlyIt recommends assessing necessity and proportionality before adopting generative AI tools.
- New Zealand - AI Privacy Guidance — Guideline, In Force
- New Zealand - Responsible AI Guidance, Governance and Institutional Framework — Guideline, In Force
- New Zealand - AI Guidance for Businesses, Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-06
Portugal
Guidance or policy onlyThe resolution mandates development of the national AMÁLIA large language model.
- Portugal - Development of AI Model (201/2024), Overview — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Qatar
Guidance or policy onlyIt identifies generative-AI-specific risks and proposes mitigations.
- Qatar - AI Security Guidelines, Core approach — Guideline, In Force
0 of 1 regions address this
- DohaNot found in the instruments we track
Russia
Guidance or policy onlyIt encourages cooperation concerning universal or general AI systems and prevention of their threats.
- Russia - AI Ethics Guidelines (2021), Section I, 2.9 — Guideline, Adopted (from 2021-10-26)
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 2 regions address this
- MoscowNot found in the instruments we track
- TatarstanNot found in the instruments we track
Saudi Arabia
Guidance or policy onlyIt imposes obligations on deepfake content creators, including controls over synthetic media creation and distribution.
- Saudi Arabia - Deepfakes Guidelines, 6. Guidance for Deepfake Content Creators — Guideline, Draft
- Saudi Arabia - Generative AI Guidelines, Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Serbia
Guidance or policy onlyIt recommends informing people when system output is a generated result.
- Serbia - Ethical AI Guidelines, 4.6.2 Recommendations — Guideline, Adopted (from 2023-03-23)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Slovakia
Guidance or policy onlySchools must require students to declare and attribute AI use in coursework.
- Slovakia - AI in Education Guidelines, Implementation Framework — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Sweden
Guidance or policy onlyThe strategy directs use of copyright-compliant data for large-scale Swedish AI language models.
- Sweden National AI Strategy 2026, Key Focus Areas — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Switzerland
Guidance or policy onlyThe fact sheet sets mandatory operational conditions for federal employees using generative AI tools.
- Switzerland - Generative AI Guidelines, Core rules — Guideline, In Force
- Switzerland - AI Systems Strategy, Implementation Framework — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Ukraine
Guidance or policy onlyIt regulates AI-generated advertising content, including labelling and review before publication.
- Ukraine - Responsible AI in Advertising, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Ukraine - Responsible AI Use in Media, Key Focus Areas — Transparency and Disclosure Standards — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
United Arab Emirates
Guidance or policy onlyThe Guide recommends detection and mitigation measures for synthetic media and generative advances.
- United Arab Emirates - Deepfake Awareness Guide, Key Focus Areas — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 2 regions address this
- Abu DhabiNot found in the instruments we track
- DubaiNot found in the instruments we track
Not found in the instruments we track (30)
Austria
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Bangladesh
Not found in the instruments we trackBelgium
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Bulgaria
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Costa Rica
Not found in the instruments we trackCôte d'Ivoire
Not found in the instruments we trackCzech Republic
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ecuador
Not found in the instruments we trackEgypt
Not found in the instruments we trackEstonia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ethiopia
Not found in the instruments we trackFrance
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Ghana
Not found in the instruments we trackGreece
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Iceland
Not found in the instruments we trackIndia
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 4 regions address this
- KarnatakaNot found in the instruments we track
- MaharashtraNot found in the instruments we track
- Tamil NaduNot found in the instruments we track
- TelanganaNot found in the instruments we track
Iran
Not found in the instruments we trackIraq
Not found in the instruments we trackJapan
Not found in the instruments we trackLebanon
Not found in the instruments we trackMaldives
Not found in the instruments we trackMorocco
Not found in the instruments we track0 of 1 regions address this
- Casablanca-SettatNot found in the instruments we track
Pakistan
Not found in the instruments we trackPanama
Not found in the instruments we trackRwanda
Not found in the instruments we trackSenegal
Not found in the instruments we trackSlovenia
Not found in the instruments we trackAs an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
South Africa
Not found in the instruments we trackTunisia
Not found in the instruments we trackUruguay
Not found in the instruments we track
International organisations (24)
African Union
Not found in the instruments we trackAPEC
Not found in the instruments we trackASEAN
Not found in the instruments we trackBRICS
Not found in the instruments we trackCouncil of Europe
Not found in the instruments we trackEuropean Union
Yes — binding law in forceProviders of systems generating synthetic content placed on the market before August 2026 must comply with Article 50(2).
- Digital Omnibus on AI, Article 111(4) amendment — Regulation, In Force
- EU AI Act, Key Focus Areas — Regulation, In Force (Amended)
- EU AI Act Enforcement, Key Focus Areas — Regulation, In Force
- and 8 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-11
G7
Guidance or policy onlyIt recommends content-authentication measures for advanced systems, including to identify AI-generated content.
- G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Principle 7 — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-12-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
GPAI
Not found in the instruments we trackIAEA
Not found in the instruments we trackICAO
Not found in the instruments we trackIEEE
Not found in the instruments we trackILO
Not found in the instruments we trackInternational
Not found in the instruments we trackInterpol
Not found in the instruments we trackISO
Not found in the instruments we trackITU
Not found in the instruments we trackNATO
Not found in the instruments we trackOAS
Not found in the instruments we trackOECD
Not found in the instruments we trackUNESCO
Not found in the instruments we trackUnited Nations
Not found in the instruments we trackWHO
Not found in the instruments we trackWorld Bank
Not found in the instruments we trackWorld Economic Forum
Guidance or policy onlyIt recommends lifecycle-wide risk mitigation and guardrails for generative AI models.
- Global - AI Governance Framework, Implementation Framework — Policy, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-09