Which countries define artificial intelligence in law?

Where an instrument gives its own legal definition of AI or an AI system.

29 of 109 reviewed jurisdictions address this in at least one tracked instrument. Updated 2026-10-09.

Each answer cites the instrument it rests on; open it for the provision and the full analysis. Whether a rule is binding law, a bill or guidance comes from the instrument's type and status, not from wording.

“Not found” means none of the instruments we track for that jurisdiction addresses the topic. It is not a finding that no such rule exists.

Yes — binding law in force (15)

Argentina
Yes — binding law in force
The decree defines artificial intelligence as machine-based systems making predictions, recommendations, or decisions for human-defined objectives.
- Argentina - Santa Fe - AI Adoption Protocol (2726/2025), Artículo 2°, inciso 1 — Decree, In Force
- Argentina - San Luis - Judicial AI Protocol (2024), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
- Argentina - Buenos Aires - AI Guidelines (4/2025), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
- and 9 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
4 of 4 regions address this
- Buenos AiresGuidance or policy only
  The text defines generative artificial intelligence as AI technology that creates new content from training-data patterns.
  - Argentina - Buenos Aires - Generative AI Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- JujuyGuidance or policy only
  The text defines AI as systems simulating human cognitive functions in judicial operations.
  - Argentina - Jujuy - AI Use Protocol (Acordada N° 31/2025), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-07
- Río NegroGuidance or policy only
  The text defines generative AI as advanced systems that produce novel content from learned data patterns.
  - Argentina - Río Negro - AI Good Practices Protocol (RAI-AR-RN-PDBPPXX-2024), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
- San JuanPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It defines AI as technologies performing tasks that ordinarily require human intelligence.
  - Argentina - San Juan - AI Judicial Protocol (2024), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
China
Yes — binding law in force
The Measures define generative AI technology as models and related technologies able to generate specified content.
- China - Generative AI Services Management, 第二十二条第（一）项 — Regulation, In Force
- China - Internet Information Synthesis Regulation, 第二十三条 — Regulation, In Force
- China AI Ethics and Safety Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
3 of 4 regions address this
- BeijingNot found in the instruments we track
- ShanghaiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The regulations define AI as theories, methods, technologies, and application systems using computers to simulate and expand human intelligence.
  - China - Shanghai - AI Industry Promotion (2022), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-07
- ShenzhenPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The regulation defines AI as computer-based simulation, extension, or expansion of human intelligence.
  - China - Shenzhen - AI Industry Promotion (2022), Article 2 — Regulation, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- ZhejiangGuidance or policy only
  The text defines AI as the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines.
  - China - Zhejiang - AI Industry Development, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
Finland
Yes — binding law in force
It defines an AI system as a machine-based system that infers outputs from inputs for objectives.
- Finland AI Act Implementation Law, Definitions — Act, In Force
- Finland - AI Deployment Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- Finland - National AI Strategy (2017), Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
1 of 1 regions address this
- HelsinkiGuidance or policy only
  The register defines AI and algorithmic systems as automated data-processing software or processes making predictions, classifications, or recommendations.
  - Finland - Helsinki - AI Register, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-06
Iran
Yes — binding law in force
The Act defines artificial intelligence as technologies simulating human intelligence processes through algorithms and data processing.
- Iran National AI Organization, Definitions — Decree, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Kazakhstan
Yes — binding law in force
The law defines artificial intelligence as a functional capacity to imitate human cognitive functions.
- Kazakhstan - AI Regulation (2025), Статья 1, подпункт 3) — Act, In Force (Amended)
- Kazakhstan Digital Code, Definitions — Act, Adopted (from 2026-07-01)
- Kazakhstan - AI Development Strategy (No. 592/2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Latvia
Yes — binding law in force
The text functionally defines an artificial intelligence system as one that generates specified synthetic media.
- Latvia - AI Use in Campaigning (2024), Definitions — Act, In Force
- Latvia - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2020-02-04)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Lithuania
Yes — binding law in force
The text defines an AI system by its technical approaches and decision, recommendation or prediction outputs.
- Lithuania - AI Act Implementation (XV-106), Definitions — Act, In Force
- Lithuania - AI Development Action Plan, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- Lithuania - AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- and 2 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Peru
Yes — binding law in force
The text defines AI as an emerging technology with potential to improve wellbeing, innovation and productivity.
- Peru - AI Promotion Law (31814) — Act, In Force
- Peru - AI Interoperability for Foreign Affairs (07619), Definitions — Act, In Force
- Peru - Penal Code AI Modifications (10525/2024), Definitions — Act, Adopted
- and 8 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Philippines
Yes — binding law in force
It defines artificial intelligence technology as computer systems or machines simulating human intelligence processes.
- Philippines - AI Campaign Content Prohibition (11064/2024), Article II, Definition 2 — Regulation, In Force
- Philippines - AI Development Regulation (HB 7396), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- Philippines - AI Regulation for Elections (HB 10567) — Bill, Under Review
- and 3 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Singapore
Yes — binding law in force
The Guide defines Generative AI as software generating content from user prompts.
- Singapore - Generative AI Use in Courts (Registrar's Circular No. 1/2024), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
- Singapore - Ethical AI Advisory Council, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Singapore - Personal Data in AI Systems, 1.2 — Guideline, In Force
- and 6 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
Slovakia
Yes — binding law in force
The text states a definition of an AI system as a machine-based system producing outputs from inferred objectives.
- Slovakia AI Conformity Assessment Act, Definitions — Act, In Force
- Slovakia - AI in Education Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Slovakia - Digital Transformation Plan, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
South Korea
Yes — binding law in force
The Act defines AI as electronic implementation of human intellectual abilities.
- South Korea AI Trust Framework Act, Definitions — Act, In Force
- South Korea - Intelligent Robot Promotion Act (2008), Definitions — Act, In Force (Amended)
- South Korea - AI Industry Promotion (AIPTRXX/2022), Definitions — Bill, Proposed
- and 4 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
0 of 1 regions address this
- SeoulNot found in the instruments we track
Taiwan
Yes — binding law in force
The Act defines artificial intelligence as autonomous systems using machine learning and algorithms to produce outputs.
- Taiwan AI Basic Act, Article 3 — Act, In Force
- Taiwan - AI Evaluation Centre, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Taiwan - AI Action Plan 2.0, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2026-12-31)
Status verified 2026-09-09
0 of 1 regions address this
- KaohsiungNot found in the instruments we track
United Kingdom
Yes — binding law in force
It defines a CSA Image Generator as AI models or software optimised or adapted to generate indecent child imagery.
- UK Crime and Policing Bill 2025, Definitions — Act, In Force
- United Kingdom - AI Security Institute, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- UK AI Safety Standards for Education, Definitions — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
- and 5 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
1 of 1 regions address this
- ScotlandPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text defines AI as autonomous systems that analyse their environment and act to achieve goals.
  - United Kingdom - Scotland - AI Register (2025), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
United States
Yes — binding law in force
The order defines an LLM as a generative AI model trained on broad datasets to produce natural-language responses.
- US Federal Government Woke AI Prevention Order, Sec. 2(c) — Decree, In Force
- United States - AI Leadership Initiative (EO 13859), Sec. 9(a) — Decree, In Force
- United States - National AI Initiative (Pub. L. 116–283), § 9401(3) — Act, In Force
- and 20 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
27 of 51 states address this
- AlabamaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence as artificial or generative systems operating without significant human oversight or learning from data.
  - United States - Alabama - Deepfake Regulation (HB 172), Definitions — Act, In Force
  - Alabama AI Health Coverage Act, Section 1(a)(1) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2026-10-01)
  Status verified 2026-09-17
- AlaskaNot found in the instruments we track
- ArizonaNot found in the instruments we track
- ArkansasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The act defines artificial intelligence as a machine-based system making predictions, recommendations, or decisions based on human objectives.
  - United States - Arkansas - AI Policy Requirements (Act 848), Definitions — Act, In Force
  - United States - Arkansas - AI Content Ownership (Act 927) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-07
- CaliforniaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It defines an artificial intelligence model as a machine-based system that infers outputs from inputs to influence environments.
  - United States - California - AI Transparency Act (SB 53), Section 22757.11(b) — Act, In Force
  - California AI Healthcare Deception Law, Section 4999.8(a) — Act, In Force
  - California AI Transparency Amendments, Section 22757.1(a) — Act, In Force (Amended)
  - and 4 more
  Status verified 2026-09-10
- ColoradoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text defines an algorithmic decision system as a machine-based system or computational process using specified techniques.
  - Colorado AI Act Delay, Definitions — Act, In Force
  - United States - Colorado - Synthetic Media Disclosure (HB 24-1147), Definitions — Act, In Force
  - Colorado Psychotherapy AI Restrictions Act — Act, In Force
  - and 2 more
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- ConnecticutPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text defines AI as techniques designed to emulate or approximate a human cognitive task, among other criteria.
  - United States - Connecticut - AI Impact Assessment (Public Act 23-16), Definitions — Act, In Force
  - United States - Connecticut - AI and Data Privacy Act (SB 1103), Sec. 1(a)(1) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- DelawareNot found in the instruments we track
- FloridaNot found in the instruments we track
- GeorgiaAdopted — not yet in force
  The instrument defines artificial intelligence as a machine-based system making predictions, recommendations, or decisions.
  - Georgia AI in Insurance Coverage Act — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
  - Georgia AI Chatbot Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
  - United States - Georgia - AI Governance Guidelines (2024), Definitions — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
  - and 1 more
  Status verified 2026-09-07
- HawaiiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence as an engineered or machine-based system that generates outputs from inputs.
  - Hawaii AI Disclosure Safety Act, §481B-__, subsection (k) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- IdahoPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines generative artificial intelligence as models capable of creating new content.
  - Idaho K-12 Generative AI Education Act, Definitions — Act, In Force
  - Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act, Definitions — Bill, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-07-01)
  Status verified 2026-09-10
- IllinoisPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The instrument defines artificial intelligence as a machine-based system that infers how to generate outputs from inputs.
  - United States - Illinois - AI Employment Regulation (HB 3773), Definitions — Act, In Force
  - Illinois AI Teacher Evaluation Ban, Definitions — Bill, Adopted
  - Illinois AI Rental Price Coordination Ban, Definitions — Bill, In Force
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- IndianaNot found in the instruments we track
- IowaNot found in the instruments we track
- KansasNot found in the instruments we track
- KentuckyNot found in the instruments we track
- LouisianaProposed
  The Act defines artificial intelligence by incorporating the definition in another Louisiana statute.
  - Louisiana AI Campaign Disclosure Act, R.S. 18:1483(33) — Bill, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-07
- MainePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines an artificial intelligence chatbot as software that simulates human conversation through text or audio.
  - United States - Maine - AI Transparency Act, Definitions — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- MarylandNot found in the instruments we track
- MassachusettsNot found in the instruments we track
- MichiganPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  HB 5143 defines AI as a machine-based system making predictions, recommendations, or decisions affecting real or virtual environments.
  - United States - Michigan - AI in Elections (HB 5141-5145), Definitions; House Bill 5143 — Act, In Force
  - United States - Michigan - AI in Political Advertising (PA 263-266), House Bill 5143 (Public Act 264 of 2023) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- MinnesotaNot found in the instruments we track
- MississippiPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence as a machine-based system that makes predictions, recommendations, or decisions.
  - Mississippi AI Definition Act, Section 1 — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- MissouriNot found in the instruments we track
- MontanaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text defines an AI system as a machine-based system making predictions, recommendations, or decisions.
  - United States - Montana - Right to Compute Act (SB 212) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- NebraskaAdopted — not yet in force
  The text defines a conversational AI service as a public AI application that primarily simulates human conversation.
  - Nebraska Conversational AI Safety Act — Act, Awaiting Entry
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
- NevadaNot found in the instruments we track
- New HampshirePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It defines responsive generative communication as AI applications whose sole purpose is responsive open-ended generative communication.
  - New Hampshire AI Child Safety Law — Act, In Force
  - United States - New Hampshire - Deepfakes in Elections (HB 1596), Definitions — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- New JerseyPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence as technologies performing tasks normally requiring human intelligence.
  - United States - New Jersey - AI Development Act (P.L.2020, c.156), Definitions — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- New MexicoNot found in the instruments we track
- New YorkPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence frontier models as advanced AI systems with actual or potential catastrophic-risk capabilities.
  - New York AI Frontier Model Safety Requirements Act, Definitions — Act, In Force
  - United States - New York - Employment Decision Tools (LL144), Definitions — Regulation, In Force
  - New York RAISE Act Amendments — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- North CarolinaGuidance or policy only
  The framework defines AI as engineered systems that learn, adapt, and perform human-intelligence-associated tasks.
  - United States - North Carolina - Responsible AI Framework, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-17
- North DakotaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It describes AI as computer systems able to generate, synthesize, or manipulate content.
  - United States - North Dakota - AI Disclosure in Politics (HB 1167), Definitions — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- OhioProposed
  The bill defines an AI system as software, a machine, or a system simulating humanlike cognitive functions.
  - United States - Ohio - AI Nonsentience Declaration (HB 469), Definitions — Bill, Proposed
  Status verified 2026-09-06
- OklahomaNot found in the instruments we track
- OregonNot found in the instruments we track
- PennsylvaniaNot found in the instruments we track
- Puerto RicoNot found in the instruments we track
- Rhode IslandNot found in the instruments we track
- South CarolinaNot found in the instruments we track
- South DakotaNot found in the instruments we track
- TennesseePartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence by reference to systems capable of human-intelligence-associated functions.
  - Tennessee Bans AI Mental Health Professional Impersonation, Definitions — Act, In Force
  - Tennessee AI Training Felony Act, Definitions — Bill, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- TexasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It defines an artificial intelligence system.
  - United States - Texas - AI Governance Act (HB 149), Sec. 551.001 — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- UtahPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence as a machine-based system making predictions, recommendations, or decisions.
  - Utah AI Policy Office Amendments, Section 13-72-101(3) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-10
- VermontNot found in the instruments we track
- VirginiaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text states a definition of artificial intelligence based on machine simulation and autonomous learning.
  - United States - Virginia - AI Commission (SB 487) — Act, In Force
  - Virginia AI Chatbot Minor Protection Act, Definitions — Bill, Under Review
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- WashingtonPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Act defines artificial intelligence as machine learning and related data-trained technologies performing human-like tasks.
  - Washington AI in Insurance Prior Authorization Act, Sec. 2, RCW 48.43.830 definitions — Act, In Force
  - Washington AI Companion Chatbot Act, Sec. 2(2) — Act, Awaiting Entry (from 2027-01-01)
  - Washington AI Chatbot Safety Bill, Sec. 2(2) — Bill, In Force
  - and 1 more
  Status verified 2026-09-07
- West VirginiaNot found in the instruments we track
- WisconsinNot found in the instruments we track
- WyomingPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It defines an artificial intelligence system as a machine-learning-based system that generates specified outputs.
  - Wyoming AI Child Exploitation and Deepfake Law, 6-1-104(a)(xix) — Act, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08

Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law (10)

Austria
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The text defines AI as systems performing tasks through data processing with algorithmic models.
- Austria - AI Advisory Board, Definitions — Act, In Force
- Austria - AI for Climate Action, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Austria - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2021-09-01)
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Brazil
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The text defines AI as algorithms and machine-learning capabilities integrated into the surveillance system.
- Brazil - São Paulo - AI Surveillance Program (63.552/2024), Definitions — Decree, In Force
- Brazil - National AI Regulation (2.338/2023), Art. 4º, I — Bill, Under Review
- Brazil - National AI Strategy (Portaria MCTI No. 4.617), Definitions — Policy, In Force (Amended)
Canada
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The text defines an artificial intelligence system as a machine-based system generating influential outputs from inputs.
- Canada - Ontario - Cybersecurity and AI Act (Bill 194) — Act, In Force
- Canada - Generative AI Guidance, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Canada - Automated Decision-Making Directive, Appendix A - Definitions, Artificial Intelligence — Policy, In Force (Amended)
- and 5 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
2 of 4 regions address this
- AlbertaNot found in the instruments we track
- British ColumbiaGuidance or policy only
  The principles define AI as technologies able to perform complex tasks normally requiring human intelligence.
  - Canada - British Columbia - AI Responsible Use Principles, Definitions — Policy, Draft
  Status verified 2026-09-10
- OntarioNot found in the instruments we track
- QuebecGuidance or policy only
  The statement defines AI by adopting the OECD definition of an AI system.
  - Canada - Quebec - Responsible AI Use Guidelines, Introduction — Guideline, In Force
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Chile
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The policy defines an AI system as a computational system that infers from inputs to generate influential outputs.
- Chile - National AI Policy Update (12/2024), Definitions — Decree, In Force
- Chile - AI and Robotics Regulation (Boletín 15869-19) — Bill, Under Review
- Chile - AI Systems Regulation (Boletín 16821-19), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- and 6 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
Ethiopia
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Regulation defines artificial intelligence as algorithm-based efficiency mimicking biological intelligence and human cognitive abilities.
- Ethiopia - AI Institute Establishment (510/2022), Article 2(1) — Regulation, In Force
- Ethiopia - National AI Policy (2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
Hungary
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
For implementation, ministries are instructed to treat AI broadly as including specified algorithmic and data-driven systems.
- Hungary - AI Social Awareness Measures (1405/2025), Definitions — Decree, In Force
- Hungary - International AI Cooperation (1404/2025), Definitions — Decree, In Force
- Hungary - National AI Strategy (1573/2020), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2020-09-09)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Japan
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The Act defines AI-related technologies as technologies enabling functions that substitute human cognitive, reasoning and judgment abilities, including related
- Japan - AI Research and Development Act (2025), 定義 — Act, In Force
- Japan - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2021-06-11)
- Japan - AI Utilization Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, Adopted (from 2019-08-09)
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-07
Russia
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The strategy states a definition of artificial intelligence.
- Russia - National AI Development Strategy (Decree No. 490), Definitions — Decree, In Force (Amended)
Status verified 2026-09-10
1 of 2 regions address this
- MoscowPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The Law defines artificial intelligence as technological solutions that imitate human cognitive functions.
  - Russia - Moscow - AI Development Experiment (123-FZ/2020), Статья 2, часть 1, пункт 2 — Act, In Force (Amended)
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- TatarstanNot found in the instruments we track
Turkey
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The text describes artificial intelligence as encompassing specified machine-learning, autonomous, and data-processing technologies.
- Turkey - AI Research Commission (No. 1426/2024), Definitions — Act, In Force
- Turkey - AI Law Amendments (Esas No. 2/3358), Article 1 — Bill, Under Review
- Turkey - AI Regulation Bill (2/2234), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- and 6 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
Uzbekistan
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The resolution defines artificial intelligence as technological solutions simulating human intelligence.
- Uzbekistan AI Introduction Measures, Definitions and Scope — Decree, In Force (Amended)
- Uzbekistan - AI Regulation (2025) — Bill, Proposed
- Uzbekistan - AI Development Strategy (PP-358/2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09

Adopted — not yet in force (1)

Uruguay
Adopted — not yet in force
The text defines an AI system as a machine-based system that infers from inputs to generate outputs that may influence environments.
- Uruguay - AI and Human Rights (CETS No. 225), Definitions — Regulation, Awaiting Entry
Status verified 2026-09-09

Proposed (15)

Colombia
Proposed
The bill defines artificial intelligence as a system generating outputs that influence environments or people.
- Colombia - Ethical AI Law Proposal (PL 005/2024C), Definitions — Bill, Stalled
- Colombia - AI Regulation (154/2024), 4. CONTENIDO DEL PROYECTO — Bill, Under Review
- Colombia - AI Regulation Bill (C200/2023) — Bill, Stalled
- and 5 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
Costa Rica
Proposed
The bill defines artificial intelligence systems as systems performing human-intelligence tasks.
- Costa Rica - AI Regulation Bill, Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- Costa Rica AI Regulation Bill, ARTÍCULO 2 — Bill, Under Review
- Costa Rica - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-10-24)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Ecuador
Proposed
The bill defines an AI system as a machine-based system generating outputs that influence real or virtual environments.
- Ecuador - AI Regulation and Promotion (2024) — Bill, Under Review
Status verified 2026-09-09
India
Proposed
The Bill defines AI as computer systems or applications performing tasks typically requiring human intelligence.
- India AI Ethics and Accountability Bill, Definitions — Bill, Proposed
- India SEBI AI Responsibility Proposal for Securities Market, Definitions — Regulation, Proposed
- India - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2018-06-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
3 of 4 regions address this
- KarnatakaNot found in the instruments we track
- MaharashtraGuidance or policy only
  The policy defines AI as machine learning, deep learning and neural networks performing human-intelligence tasks.
  - India - Maharashtra - AI in Agriculture (2025-29), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- Tamil NaduPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text defines AI as systems that analyze their environment and act autonomously toward goals.
  - India - Tamil Nadu - AI Mission (G.O. 25/2024), Definitions — Decree, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- TelanganaGuidance or policy only
  The document defines artificial intelligence as a computer-science field creating machines that perform human-intelligence tasks.
  - India - Telangana - AI Strategy Framework, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
Indonesia
Proposed
The draft defines artificial intelligence as computational systems performing tasks associated with intelligent agents.
- Indonesia - National AI Regulation, Definitions — Decree, Draft
- Indonesia - National AI Roadmap, Definitions — Policy, Draft
- Indonesia - AI Governance for Banking, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
Kenya
Proposed
The Bill defines AI as machines performing tasks associated with human intelligence.
- Kenya - Robotics and AI Society Bill (2023), Section 2 — Bill, Under Review
- Kenya - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2027-09-30)
- Kenya - Media Reporting Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-08
Mexico
Proposed
The draft defines artificial intelligence as tools that generate, manipulate or simulate audiovisual materials.
- Mexico - Criminalizing Non-consensual AI Content (2025), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - Criminal Code Reform on AI (2025), Article 211 Bis 8 (proposed) — Bill, Under Review
- Mexico - AI Education Reform Bill (RAI-MX-NA-IQRLLXX-2025), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- and 3 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-07
Netherlands
Proposed
It states that an AI system is a machine-based system that infers how to generate outputs.
- Netherlands AI Act Implementation Draft, Definitions — Bill, Proposed
- Netherlands - AI Investment Programme, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Netherlands - AI and Human Rights (2019), Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- and 6 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
1 of 1 regions address this
- AmsterdamGuidance or policy only
  The register defines an algorithm as computer instructions or models that process data and produce outputs.
  - Netherlands - Amsterdam - Algorithm Transparency (2020), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
  Status verified 2026-09-09
New Zealand
Proposed
The explanatory note defines an automated decision as one made without substantial human involvement.
- NZ Welfare Automation Act, Explanatory note — Context — Bill, In Force
- New Zealand - AI Privacy Guidance, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- New Zealand - AI Strategy (2025), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2025-07-08)
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-10
Nigeria
Proposed
The Bill defines an artificial intelligence system as an algorithmic system performing tasks or predictions.
- Nigeria - AI Technology Control (HB 942), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- Nigeria - AI Code of Practice (2025), Definitions — Regulation, Draft
- Nigeria - Lagos - AI Guidelines (LSAGXXX-2025), Definitions — Guideline, Adopted (from 2025-08-01)
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
Norway
Proposed
The draft defines an AI system as a machine-based system that can adapt and infer outputs from inputs.
- Norway - AI Regulation (2026), Definitions — Bill, Draft
- Norway - AI Coordination Plan, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Norway - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2020-01-14)
Status verified 2026-09-10
Panama
Proposed
It defines AI broadly as systems performing tasks that normally require human intelligence.
- Panama - AI Regulation (Bill No. 14), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- Panama - National Science and Technology Plan, Definitions — Policy, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Romania
Proposed
The draft states that an AI system includes software and hardware producing automated decisions or outputs.
- Romania - AI Legal Framework (B154/2024), Definitions — Bill, Under Review
- Romania - National AI Strategy, CAPITOLUL 1, secțiunea 1.1 — Policy, Adopted
- Romania - National AI Governance (20D/31781), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2022-11-11)
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Thailand
Proposed
The draft includes working definitions, including a definition of an AI system.
- Thailand - AI Risk Assessment Guidelines, Definitions — Regulation, Draft
- Thailand - AI Business Operations (2022), Definitions — Decree, Draft
- Thailand - AI Innovation Testing Center, Definitions — Regulation, Draft
- and 3 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
Ukraine
Proposed
It defines an AI system as machine-based technology making predictions, recommendations, or decisions affecting environments.
- Ukraine - AI and Human Rights, Definitions — Regulation, Proposed
- Ukraine AI & Blockchain Innovation Sandbox, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Ukraine - AI Development Strategy (Order No. 1556-р), Definitions — Policy, In Force (Amended)
- and 2 more
Status verified 2026-09-10

Guidance or policy only (37)

Australia
Guidance or policy only
The Plan states that an AI system is a machine-based system that infers how to generate outputs.
- Australia - National AI Strategy (2025), Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Australia - AI Assurance Framework (2024), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Australia - Responsible AI Use Policy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- and 1 more
6 of 7 regions address this
- Australian Capital TerritoryGuidance or policy only
  It defines AI as systems performing tasks traditionally associated with human intelligence.
  - Australia - Australian Capital Territory - AI Policy (2025), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- New South WalesGuidance or policy only
  The text defines AI as advanced computing technology that identifies meaningful patterns in data to augment decisions.
  - Australia - New South Wales - AI Assurance Framework (2022), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-17
- Northern TerritoryGuidance or policy only
  The framework defines artificial intelligence as technology simulating human intelligence for tasks requiring human cognition.
  - Australia - Northern Territory - AI Assurance Framework (2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- QueenslandGuidance or policy only
  The text defines AI as systems using data-driven or rule-based techniques for tasks ordinarily requiring human intelligence.
  - Australia - Queensland - AI Governance Policy (2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  - Australia - Queensland - AI Governance Policy (RAI-AU-QL-ARTINGO-2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  - Australia - Queensland - AI Risk Assessment (2024), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
  Status verified 2026-09-10
- TasmaniaGuidance or policy only
  The guidance defines AI as engineered systems that generate predictive outputs.
  - Australia - Tasmania - AI Use Guidelines (2024), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- VictoriaGuidance or policy only
  The text defines AI technologies broadly as systems undertaking directed tasks using automation, machine learning, or related technologies.
  - Australia - Victoria - AI Recordkeeping Policy (RAI-AU-VI-AIATRXX-2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  - Australia - Victoria - Generative AI Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-08
- Western AustraliaNot found in the instruments we track
Bangladesh
Guidance or policy only
The draft provides working definitions, including for AI systems and high-risk AI systems.
- Bangladesh - National AI Policy (2024), Definitions — Policy, Draft
- Bangladesh - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-10
Belgium
Guidance or policy only
The programme defines AI as data-driven systems and techniques performing tasks traditionally requiring human intelligence.
- Belgium - Walloon AI Programme, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Belgium - AI for Common Good, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Belgium - Wallonia - AI Adoption Program, Definitions — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Bulgaria
Guidance or policy only
The Concept describes AI systems as software, potentially with hardware, that perceive data, interpret it, reason and select actions.
- Bulgaria - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2020-12-16)
- Bulgaria - AI Coordinated Plan (2021), Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- Bulgaria - AI in Education Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Draft
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-08
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Croatia
Guidance or policy only
The draft states a definition of artificial intelligence as software and systems performing human-like cognitive tasks.
- Croatia - National AI Development Plan, Definitions — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-06
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Cyprus
Guidance or policy only
The framework states a definition of an AI system.
- Cyprus - AI Regulation Implementation (2024/1689), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-11-06)
- Cyprus - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Czech Republic
Guidance or policy only
The Strategy defines AI broadly to include machine learning, rule-based systems, robotics and automated decision-making tools.
- Czech Republic - National AI Strategy (2019), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2019-05-06)
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Denmark
Guidance or policy only
The guides define generative AI as models that create outputs from prompts.
- Denmark - Responsible Generative AI Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Denmark - National AI Taskforce, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Denmark - AI Regulatory Sandbox, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Egypt
Guidance or policy only
The Charter defines artificial intelligence as systems able to perceive, reason, learn, and act toward goals.
- Egypt - Responsible AI Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, Adopted (from 2023-04-19)
- Egypt - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-10
Estonia
Guidance or policy only
The text defines AI as systems performing tasks with varying autonomy, including machine learning and generative models.
- Estonia - AI and Data Action Plan, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Estonia - National AI Education Initiative, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2025-09-01)
- Estonia - National AI Strategy (2019–2021), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2019-07-25)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
France
Guidance or policy only
The report states a broad definition of artificial intelligence for its purposes.
- France - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2018-03-28)
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Germany
Guidance or policy only
The text defines AI broadly as data-driven and algorithmic systems enabling automated or semi-automated decisions, prediction and optimisation.
- Germany - AI Observatory for Society, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Germany - AI Standardisation Roadmap, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-01-26)
- Germany - National AI Strategy Update, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- and 1 more
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
3 of 3 regions address this
- Baden-WürttembergGuidance or policy only
  The initiative defines intelligent systems as systems that perceive their environment, learn from data, and act autonomously or semi-autonomously.
  - Germany - Baden-Württemberg - AI Research Initiative, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- BavariaGuidance or policy only
  The initiative states what Artificial Intelligence means within its context.
  - Germany - Bavaria - AI Initiative (2019), Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- North Rhine-WestphaliaGuidance or policy only
  The strategy defines AI as technologies enabling machines to perceive, solve problems, and act toward goals.
  - Germany - North Rhine-Westphalia - AI Strategy 2.0, Definitions — Policy, In Force
Ghana
Guidance or policy only
The Strategy provides a working definition of artificial intelligence.
- Ghana - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-10-01)
Status verified 2026-09-10
Iceland
Guidance or policy only
The plan describes AI as technologies enabling machines to perform tasks traditionally requiring human cognition.
- Iceland AI Action Plan, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Iceland - AI Policy (2021), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2021-01-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Iraq
Guidance or policy only
The text defines artificial intelligence as systems capable of autonomous learning and decision-making.
- Iraq - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-10
Ireland
Guidance or policy only
It defines AI as machine-based systems that make predictions, recommendations or decisions using data.
- Ireland - National AI Strategy, Introduction, “What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)?” — Policy, Adopted (from 2021-07-08)
- Ireland - Responsible AI Use Guidelines, Chapter 2, 2.1 What is AI? — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Israel
Guidance or policy only
The text defines AI-based systems as systems using algorithms, models or statistical procedures for human cognitive tasks.
- Israel - AI Regulation and Ethics, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-12-14)
- Israel AI Regulation in Financial Sector Report, Definitions — Policy, Draft
- Israel - Algorithmic Processing Guidance, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Italy
Guidance or policy only
No national rule found; covered by regional law.
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
2 of 2 regions address this
- Emilia-RomagnaGuidance or policy only
  The text defines AI as digital models, algorithms and technologies able to perform tasks usually requiring human intelligence.
  - Italy - Emilia-Romagna - AI Regional Hub, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- LombardyGuidance or policy only
  The text describes AI as the theory and development of computer systems performing tasks normally requiring human intelligence.
  - Italy - Lombardy - AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
Lebanon
Guidance or policy only
The strategy defines AI as autonomous systems analysing their environment and acting to achieve goals.
- Lebanon - AI Initiative, Definitions — Policy, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Luxembourg
Guidance or policy only
The proposal supplies a working definition of artificial intelligence for schools.
- Luxembourg - AI in Schools Guidelines, Definitions — Policy, Draft
- Luxembourg - National AI Strategy (2025), Definitions — Policy, Adopted
Status verified 2026-09-07
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Malaysia
Guidance or policy only
The policy provides an operational educational definition of AI.
- Malaysia - AI Literacy Program, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Malaysia - AI Consortium Initiative, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-05-10)
- Malaysia - AI National Strategy (2024), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-05-10)
- and 4 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
Maldives
Guidance or policy only
The masterplan defines artificial intelligence as systems performing tasks requiring human-like intelligence.
- Maldives - National AI Masterplan, Definitions — Policy, Draft
Status verified 2026-09-09
Malta
Guidance or policy only
It defines an AI system as one exhibiting behaviour approximating human cognitive functions.
- Malta - Ethical AI Framework, Definitions — Guideline, Adopted (from 2019-10-03)
- Malta - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Pakistan
Guidance or policy only
It defines artificial intelligence as systems displaying human-like cognitive functions.
- Pakistan - National AI Policy (2025), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2025-07-30)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Poland
Guidance or policy only
The text describes artificial intelligence as technologies already embedded in awareness and everyday work and life.
- Poland - National AI Strategy (2018), Wprowadzenie — Policy, Adopted
- Poland - AI Development Policy (Resolution No. 196/2020), Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Poland - AI Development Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Portugal
Guidance or policy only
The Agenda defines artificial intelligence as software and systems performing tasks normally requiring human intelligence.
- Portugal - National AI Agenda, Definitions — Policy, Draft
- Portugal - National Digital Strategy (207/2024), Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Portugal - Ethical AI in Public Administration, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- and 1 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Qatar
Guidance or policy only
It defines an AI system as software and related components performing automated inference, prediction, or decision functions.
- Qatar - AI Security Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Qatar - Ethical AI Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Qatar - National AI Strategy (2019), Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2019-10-29)
0 of 1 regions address this
- DohaNot found in the instruments we track
Rwanda
Guidance or policy only
The text defines an AI system as a machine-based system making predictions, recommendations, or decisions.
- Rwanda - AI Development Framework, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2026-09-30)
- Rwanda - National AI Policy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-04-20)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Saudi Arabia
Guidance or policy only
The Framework defines an AI system as an automated or semi-automated system using models for predictions, recommendations, or decisions.
- Saudi Arabia - AI Adoption Framework, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Saudi Arabia - Generative AI Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- Saudi Arabia - National AI Strategy (RAI-SA-NA-NSDAIXX-2020), Definitions — Policy, In Force
- and 1 more
Senegal
Guidance or policy only
The strategy defines AI as systems that learn, reason, and perform traditionally human tasks.
- Senegal - National AI Development Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-09-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Serbia
Guidance or policy only
The text defines artificial intelligence as systems able to learn, reason, and make decisions to achieve objectives.
- Serbia - AI Ministerial Declaration, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-12-04)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Slovenia
Guidance or policy only
The programme defines AI as a socio-technical system with perception, reasoning, learning and decision-making capabilities.
- Slovenia - AI Development Programme, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2021-05-27)
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Spain
Guidance or policy only
It defines AI as systems that analyze their environment and act with some autonomy to achieve goals.
- Spain - Basque Country - AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Spain - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2020-12-02)
- Spain - AI Research Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2019-03-04)
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
3 of 3 regions address this
- AsturiasPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  It describes AI as autonomous systems processing data and making predictions or decisions toward objectives.
  - Spain - Asturias - AI Regulation (98/2025) — Decree, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- CataloniaGuidance or policy only
  The text states a general definition of artificial intelligence as machine capacity for human-like intelligence capabilities.
  - Spain - Catalonia - AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
- GaliciaPartly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
  The text defines an AI system as an autonomous system that analyzes its environment and acts toward objectives.
  - Spain - Galicia - AI Regulation (2/2025), Definitions — Act, In Force
  - Spain - Galicia - AI Development Law (2/2025), Exposición de motivos I — Act, In Force (Amended)
  A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Sweden
Guidance or policy only
The Roadmap defines AI broadly to include statistical, machine-learning and generative models performing tasks previously requiring human intelligence.
- Sweden - AI Ecosystem Roadmap (SOU 2025:12), Definitions — Policy, Under Review
- Sweden - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2018-05-16)
- Sweden National AI Strategy 2026, Definitions — Policy, In Force
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-10
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Switzerland
Guidance or policy only
The report states a policy-focused definition of AI as methods enabling automated data-driven inferences and decisions.
- Switzerland - AI Challenges Report, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
- Switzerland - AI Convention Ratification, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2026-12-31)
- Switzerland - AI Governance Guidelines (08/2024), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- and 3 more
Status verified 2026-09-08
United Arab Emirates
Guidance or policy only
The Guideline defines an AI system as a software or machine-based system using data-driven models to perform tasks and potentially improve iteratively.
- United Arab Emirates - AI Adoption Guidelines, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- United Arab Emirates - AI Ethics Self-Assessment Tool, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- United Arab Emirates - National AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2017-10-16)
1 of 2 regions address this
- Abu DhabiNot found in the instruments we track
- DubaiGuidance or policy only
  The framework defines an AI system as software making predictions, recommendations, or decisions affecting environments.
  - United Arab Emirates - Dubai - AI Certification Framework, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  - United Arab Emirates - Dubai - AI Regulatory Sandbox, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09
Vietnam
Guidance or policy only
The initiative defines AI as systems that analyze their environment and act with some autonomy to achieve goals.
- Vietnam - Da Nang - AI Initiative, Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Vietnam - Smart City Development (243/KH-UBND), Definitions — Policy, In Force
- Vietnam - Responsible AI Development (1290/QD-BKHCN), Definitions — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
1 of 1 regions address this
- Ho Chi Minh CityGuidance or policy only
  It defines AI as computer systems performing tasks that ordinarily require human intelligence.
  - Vietnam - Ho Chi Minh City - AI Development Program, Definitions — Policy, In Force
  Status verified 2026-09-09

Not found in the instruments we track (7)

Bahrain
Not found in the instruments we track
Côte d'Ivoire
Not found in the instruments we track
Greece
Not found in the instruments we track
As an EU member state, the EU AI Act also applies here.
Hong Kong
Not found in the instruments we track
Morocco
Not found in the instruments we track
0 of 1 regions address this
- Casablanca-SettatNot found in the instruments we track
South Africa
Not found in the instruments we track
Tunisia
Not found in the instruments we track

International organisations (24)

African Union
Guidance or policy only
The strategy describes AI as advanced computational systems performing tasks normally requiring human intelligence.
- AU Continental AI Strategy, Definitions — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
APEC
Not found in the instruments we track
ASEAN
Not found in the instruments we track
BRICS
Guidance or policy only
The text defines artificial intelligence as autonomous systems analyzing their environment and acting to achieve goals.
- BRICS AI Cooperation Framework, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2024-10-24)
Status verified 2026-09-09
Council of Europe
Adopted — not yet in force
The Convention defines an AI system as a machine-based system that infers how to generate outputs.
- Council of Europe AI Convention, Article 2 — Regulation, Awaiting Entry
Status verified 2026-09-08
European Union
Yes — binding law in force
The Act defines an AI system as a machine-based system operating with autonomy that generates outputs from inputs.
- EU AI Act, Definitions — Regulation, In Force (Amended)
- European Union - AI Act Implementation, Article 3 — Policy, In Force
- EU AI Act High-Risk Classification Guidelines, II.1 The system must be an AI system (8) — Guideline, Draft
- and 8 more
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-11
G7
Guidance or policy only
It defines Advanced AI Systems as sophisticated AI technologies, including foundation models and generative AI.
- G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Core Definitions and Scope of Advanced AI — Policy, Adopted (from 2023-12-01)
Status verified 2026-09-09
GPAI
Guidance or policy only
The text defines agentic AI systems as systems capable of autonomous decisions and goal-oriented actions with limited intervention.
- GPAI Agentic AI Framework, Definitions — Policy, Adopted
A possible change to a cited instrument is not yet verified.
Status verified 2026-09-09
IAEA
Not found in the instruments we track
ICAO
Not found in the instruments we track
IEEE
Guidance or policy only
The text defines Autonomous Intelligent Systems as AI applications using symbolic, sub-symbolic, or hybrid technologies.
- IEEE Algorithmic Bias Standard, Definitions — Standard, In Force
- IEEE Autonomous Systems Transparency Standard, Definitions — Standard, In Force
- IEEE CertifAIEd Ethics Certification Program, Definitions — Standard, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
ILO
Not found in the instruments we track
International
Not found in the instruments we track
Interpol
Not found in the instruments we track
ISO
Guidance or policy only
The standard states a definition of an AI system as an engineered system generating specified outputs for human-defined objectives.
- ISO AI Concepts and Terminology Standard, Definitions — Standard, In Force
- ISO AI Management System Standard, Definitions — Standard, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
ITU
Guidance or policy only
The report defines AI as technologies enabling machines to perform tasks requiring human-like intelligence.
- ITU AI for Good Summit Report 2017, Definitions — Policy, Adopted (from 2017-06-09)
Status verified 2026-09-07
NATO
Not found in the instruments we track
OAS
Guidance or policy only
The text describes AI as a computer science discipline enabling machines to imitate human intelligence autonomously.
- OAS AI Governance Framework for the Americas, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-07
OECD
Guidance or policy only
It defines an AI system as a machine-based system that infers how to generate outputs.
- OECD AI Due Diligence Guidance, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
- OECD AI Principles, I. Terms — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
- OECD AI Principles, Section I — Guideline, In Force (Amended)
Status verified 2026-09-09
UNESCO
Guidance or policy only
It provides a functional definition of AI systems as information-processing technologies using models and algorithms for learning and cognitive tasks.
- UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendation, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-08
United Nations
Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law
The text defines AI systems broadly as technologies displaying intelligent behaviour, including learning, reasoning and problem-solving.
- United Nations - AI for Sustainable Development, Definitions — Decree, In Force
- UN Ethical AI Principles for the UN System, Definitions and Conceptual Framework — Guideline, Adopted (from 2022-09-01)
WHO
Guidance or policy only
It defines AI as a system performing tasks normally requiring human intelligence.
- WHO Health AI Ethics Guidance, Definitions — Guideline, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09
World Bank
Not found in the instruments we track
World Economic Forum
Guidance or policy only
The framework defines AI agents as AI-powered systems that independently interpret information, decide and act toward goals.
- WEF AI Agents Evaluation and Governance, Definitions — Policy, In Force
Status verified 2026-09-09

Which countries define artificial intelligence in law?

Yes — binding law in force (15)

Argentina

China

Finland

Iran

Kazakhstan

Latvia

Lithuania

Peru

Philippines

Singapore

Slovakia

South Korea

Taiwan

United Kingdom

United States

Partly — regional, framework or general (non-AI) law (10)

Austria

Brazil

Canada

Chile

Ethiopia

Hungary

Japan

Russia

Turkey

Uzbekistan

Adopted — not yet in force (1)

Uruguay

Proposed (15)

Colombia

Costa Rica

Ecuador

India

Indonesia

Kenya

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

Nigeria

Norway

Panama

Romania

Thailand

Ukraine

Guidance or policy only (37)

Australia

Bangladesh

Belgium

Bulgaria

Croatia

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Egypt

Estonia

France

Germany

Ghana

Iceland

Iraq

Ireland

Israel

Italy

Lebanon

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Maldives

Malta

Pakistan

Poland

Portugal

Qatar

Rwanda

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Serbia

Slovenia

Spain